You never just huffed off to your room, the backyard, or a friend's house down the street, in your pre-driving years? The real you, not your fake persona.
It's still a damn shame they removed the facepalm emotion. Sometimes I think our thread has been guilty of something and as punishment from the gods we got YuNobi1.
Let me make sure I got this right. Do you think that Callista's seven-year-old son apparently got pissed at his mother and ran away from home, and his mother didn't notice shit, but Yvette is supposed to notice her daughter being isolated from kids in a park the moment that it happens?
she may be a goddess but you will always be Queen
If Callista's house is right by the park, you don't think she let the kids just go and play there on a regular basis? Secondly, where are Callista and Yvette having this alleged meeting? If Kane and Callista came together, then they CAN'T be meeting at the play area, else Kane would have seen what happened to Veronica. Therefore Yvette, Callista, and Kane have to be away from Veronica long enough for her to approach the play area, try to play, get rejected, and then run off, all out of site of Kane. Did Yvette really leave Veronica in a place that she has never been to or doesn't remember being previously (assuming it's the same park, but Olivia does say the family moved around a lot)?
Good grief, NO, read the game. Callista said Elena was neglecting Olivia, and that she was the one actually raising the girl before the Leaving, and Elena agreed. So if Callista's actions are "overprotective", according to you, then what, in your mind, made Elena's treatment of baby Olivia even worse than Callista's lifelong treatment of Kane?
... WHERE?
Ignoring the fact that no decent parent would allow their single-digit kid that far away from them without adult supervision, let alone one under Callista's circumstances. So you're now saying that Yvette took her kid to the poor person's park to play, and said park just happened to be close to Callista's residence? That would be one helluva coincidence. At some point you have to concede that Callista and Yvette were meeting while said kids were playing. Yes, it wasn't stated specifically, but common sense and context clues should give us the whole story of that day.
Apparently you never frequent or pass/go through low-mid to low income neighborhoods. Kids there, ranging from 5 to 11, are always playing together on the streets or in someone's open yard (especially if that yard as anything resembling a swing or something to jump on) without an adult in sight. Especially common between the time school's out and the time parents get home, you can set your clock to it.
For the love of Stendarr's Hammer if it's not on the first page no one has it not anybody I know anyway just play on PC or God's forbid Mac for now
I think you should maybe play it again, and actually read, very carefully, what is going on (and ignore any of Yu's fatastical ravings for the time being).
I have come to the understanding over the last few days that I have been here that some people read hardly anything story-wise in the game and just look at the sexy pictures
I can't agree with that. You're judging by the last few days you've joined the discussion. But if you spend a lot of your time looking through most of the posts in our thread, you will see that there are a lot of intelligent, deep and interesting arguments and assumptions that actually make sense (unlike the nonsense that YuNobi1 writes). In addition, many points that for ordinary players became obvious only with the release of new updates, for many regular participants and visitors of this thread, became obvious long before that.
I was mostly referring to the ones whose outlandish theories are so bat shit insane that you can't help but laugh or don't really amount anything I know I used to be one of them until I actually started reading the story when the dread cruiser was in for repairs and was like hey this is fucking coolI can't agree with that. You're judging by the last few days you've joined the discussion. But if you spend a lot of your time looking through most of the posts in our thread, you will see that there are a lot of intelligent, deep and interesting arguments and assumptions that actually make sense (unlike the nonsense that YuNobi1 writes). In addition, many points that for ordinary players became obvious only with the release of new updates, for many regular participants and visitors of this thread, became obvious long before that.
Well, and newcomers, asking stupid (as it seems to us) questions and making erroneous conclusions ... well, it is inevitable, like the ebb and flow of tides. But once upon a time we were newbies too, until we plunged our heads into analyzing the events taking place in the game and began to know more.
Look at the facts, man, compare the scenes, even Dark Quean Olivia agreed with the assessment that these are different flashback periods.
I'm a simple man, I ask a simple question: Where does Callista give her reasoning? Where does she explain how her goal to keep Kane alive, and putting him in the Gambit, align? Odds of dying without the Gambit entry: 0% (or at least no higher than the average human). Odds of dying IN Gambit: at least 25% chance of death, (I'm still crunching the exact numbers so far). Therefore, a sane honest person, who claims to want someone, would conclude that a place with 0% probability of death is better than 25+% probability of death. Where in this update does Callista state the reason that she believed BEFORE the Gambit began that the 25+% death probability was the best choice to keep Kane alive?
