MisterBR

Newbie
Aug 3, 2022
52
164
Lessons in Love [v0.25.0 Part 1] [Selebus]

Compressed game for systems:
Windows, Linux and Macintosh

Approximate size is 1.44 Gigas

Windows, Linux and Macintosh :

Windows and Linux
Macintosh
 
Last edited:

MisterBR

Newbie
Aug 3, 2022
52
164
Lessons in Love [v0.25.0 Part 1] [Selebus]

Compressed game for Android

Approximate size is 1.42 Gigas

 
Last edited:

Vizer007

Active Member
Oct 15, 2019
699
701
So, whats the name of the original of notabluearchivesong? Because of this name I am REALLY curious now xD
 

barglenarglezous

Engaged Member
Sep 5, 2020
2,471
4,786
26 will have a part 3, interesting
Probably because the next two updates are massive holiday ones, so there's no convenient way to p1/p2 it without adding another update in the schedule.

The beach and Christmas events being the same update is an interesting choice -- although considering summer just started, it's going to be a much warmer Christmas than they're used to, so might as well do it on the beach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crustlord12

Vizer007

Active Member
Oct 15, 2019
699
701
Wonder how Ayane goes nuts when she realises that halloween and christmas party was...well, they were pretty much a few months ago for them? They didn't had to wait until rewamp like we did afterall xD
 

kitsunedawn

Newbie
Aug 17, 2017
98
152
He has on a number of occasions stated hard of hearing and deaf individuals don't deserve to play this game.

Last time I was on the discord, he specifically said people are *not* allowed to help deaf individuals progress and chastised another member for offering.


There is an interesting caveat to all of this, however. If what you say is correct, then such behavior can actually be reported to Patreon as mis-behavior. Since 2018, Patreon has gone to great lengths to force developers to include accessible options for disabled patreons in their options; placing a site wide ultimatum that all offerings on the site, must be disabled friendly at the very least. This comes out of a lawsuit which Patreon settled, where it had been found that the site wasn't enforcing their own accessibility rules. Patreon lost the case, agreeing to settle out of court, with part of the agreed upon change being strict adherence to their own accessibility rules for both developers and content presented on the site. Part of those rules hold developers accountable for off-site behaviors, such as the developer here (if true) stating disabled people don't deserve to play the game.

Patreon's usual response, if evidence (screen shots of statements, and so on) is provided; is to freeze the patreon payments of all developers of a project, until such time that they submit a disability friendly update, or version of the game. They also begin to regularly spot check the behavior of such developers, with a note being that further action can result in the person's entire patreon being closed and funds returned to the people that paid them.

So, if what you're saying is true, and can be proven; then the developer is playing with fire and risking someone getting pissed enough to report them for their ableist behavior.
 

Riolol

Active Member
Jan 14, 2021
719
1,951
There is an interesting caveat to all of this, however. If what you say is correct, then such behavior can actually be reported to Patreon as mis-behavior. Since 2018, Patreon has gone to great lengths to force developers to include accessible options for disabled patreons in their options; placing a site wide ultimatum that all offerings on the site, must be disabled friendly at the very least. This comes out of a lawsuit which Patreon settled, where it had been found that the site wasn't enforcing their own accessibility rules. Patreon lost the case, agreeing to settle out of court, with part of the agreed upon change being strict adherence to their own accessibility rules for both developers and content presented on the site. Part of those rules hold developers accountable for off-site behaviors, such as the developer here (if true) stating disabled people don't deserve to play the game.

Patreon's usual response, if evidence (screen shots of statements, and so on) is provided; is to freeze the patreon payments of all developers of a project, until such time that they submit a disability friendly update, or version of the game. They also begin to regularly spot check the behavior of such developers, with a note being that further action can result in the person's entire patreon being closed and funds returned to the people that paid them.

So, if what you're saying is true, and can be proven; then the developer is playing with fire and risking someone getting pissed enough to report them for their ableist behavior.
He's already banned from Patreon bc lolis
 

jasonmoritz

Newbie
Nov 14, 2019
93
84
There is an interesting caveat to all of this, however. If what you say is correct, then such behavior can actually be reported to Patreon as mis-behavior. Since 2018, Patreon has gone to great lengths to force developers to include accessible options for disabled patreons in their options; placing a site wide ultimatum that all offerings on the site, must be disabled friendly at the very least. This comes out of a lawsuit which Patreon settled, where it had been found that the site wasn't enforcing their own accessibility rules. Patreon lost the case, agreeing to settle out of court, with part of the agreed upon change being strict adherence to their own accessibility rules for both developers and content presented on the site. Part of those rules hold developers accountable for off-site behaviors, such as the developer here (if true) stating disabled people don't deserve to play the game.

Patreon's usual response, if evidence (screen shots of statements, and so on) is provided; is to freeze the patreon payments of all developers of a project, until such time that they submit a disability friendly update, or version of the game. They also begin to regularly spot check the behavior of such developers, with a note being that further action can result in the person's entire patreon being closed and funds returned to the people that paid them.

So, if what you're saying is true, and can be proven; then the developer is playing with fire and risking someone getting pissed enough to report them for their ableist behavior.
Selebus has been out of Patreon for a while now, though.
 

MSPA Judge

Newbie
Dec 21, 2019
36
30
He has on a number of occasions stated hard of hearing and deaf individuals don't deserve to play this game.

Last time I was on the discord, he specifically said people are *not* allowed to help deaf individuals progress and chastised another member for offering.
I see, sad to hear.
 

Perniciousducks

Active Member
Aug 21, 2018
597
1,273
I see, sad to hear.
just open up the code and search for dialogue for the scene you’re in. It’s all plain text and easy to follow. You can see what to do. I don’t need it for the sound bits, I use it to translate the hex text, but it could work just the same. Notepad++ is free and will search the game directory pretty quickly for anything you’re trying to find.
 

akselx

Active Member
Mar 29, 2020
760
1,232
He has on a number of occasions stated hard of hearing and deaf individuals don't deserve to play this game.

Last time I was on the discord, he specifically said people are *not* allowed to help deaf individuals progress and chastised another member for offering.
Eh, doesn't sound truthful to me. Exteregation, maybe. Especially part were "deaf individuals don't deserve to play this game." That's a cartoon villain level of petty. Guy's a pretty big lefty, the type to, at least, publicly support any manner of marginalized folks.
 

barglenarglezous

Engaged Member
Sep 5, 2020
2,471
4,786
Eh, doesn't sound truthful to me. Exteregation, maybe. Especially part were "deaf individuals don't deserve to play this game." That's a cartoon villain level of petty. Guy's a pretty big lefty, the type to, at least, publicly support any manner of marginalized folks.
Yeah, while it was ableist, it wasn't as bad as some have put it.

There was a progression.
1) "Too fucking bad"/"Not my problem"
2) "That sucks, but I'm not going to redesign around it"
3) "If they say they're deaf, they can ask for what the audio cue says, but no additional help"
 

akselx

Active Member
Mar 29, 2020
760
1,232
Yeah, while it was ableist, it wasn't as bad as some have put it.

There was a progression.
1) "Too fucking bad"/"Not my problem"
2) "That sucks, but I'm not going to redesign around it"
3) "If they say they're deaf, they can ask for what the audio cue says, but no additional help"
That's more believable. I think I even saw him saying something along the 2nd point here somewhere.
 

worthlesspeon

Member
Jun 10, 2017
191
443
Eh, doesn't sound truthful to me. Exteregation, maybe. Especially part were "deaf individuals don't deserve to play this game." That's a cartoon villain level of petty. Guy's a pretty big lefty, the type to, at least, publicly support any manner of marginalized folks.
Believe it or not, people can be hypocrites. I left the discord a while ago (must be at least a year at this point?) because of how toxic he and his fanbase can be.

Whatever, it doesn't matter. I'm not giving him money anymore. I'll just look up the answers prn. Thankfully he's god awful at programming so it's not a big deal to get around it.

There is an interesting caveat to all of this, however. If what you say is correct, then such behavior can actually be reported to Patreon as mis-behavior. Since 2018, Patreon has gone to great lengths to force developers to include accessible options for disabled patreons in their options; placing a site wide ultimatum that all offerings on the site, must be disabled friendly at the very least. This comes out of a lawsuit which Patreon settled, where it had been found that the site wasn't enforcing their own accessibility rules. Patreon lost the case, agreeing to settle out of court, with part of the agreed upon change being strict adherence to their own accessibility rules for both developers and content presented on the site. Part of those rules hold developers accountable for off-site behaviors, such as the developer here (if true) stating disabled people don't deserve to play the game.

Patreon's usual response, if evidence (screen shots of statements, and so on) is provided; is to freeze the patreon payments of all developers of a project, until such time that they submit a disability friendly update, or version of the game. They also begin to regularly spot check the behavior of such developers, with a note being that further action can result in the person's entire patreon being closed and funds returned to the people that paid them.

So, if what you're saying is true, and can be proven; then the developer is playing with fire and risking someone getting pissed enough to report them for their ableist behavior.
He was banned from patreon for a while now. I think because it's against their rules to distribute patches or "uncensored" versions of patreon content through other platforms
 
Last edited:
4.20 star(s) 299 Votes