CREATE YOUR AI CUM SLUT ON CANDY.AI TRY FOR FREE
x

Reiyayru

Newbie
Jun 2, 2018
88
243
You'll never avoid cliffhangers but I'd suggest playing the coming update, and then taking the break for the few months.

Next month's update is basically filler, and I'm sure nothing big is going to happen until the next maya / ami updates, and even then they'll probably not be that expository (I suspect that I won't get the answers I want about maya this update and I'd have to wait that long for them instead)

although...
After seeing all these previews I'll more then likely to yeah, far too curious about to avoid it now. Also what I meant by cliffhangers are like events being split (Unless that is something that is common then I really will have no choice) not necessarily an event being done with something happening that will be answered later in a separate event if that makes sense.
 

ElukiaTV

Active Member
Mar 11, 2019
684
919
So the gears move once again...
Oh dear.
The ride never ends, ladies and gentleman. And we are here to suffer untl the very end.
 

Moonflare

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2023
1,606
7,143
There's been a sudden influx of newbies, where are all you guys coming from? What lead you to this game/thread?
I heard this was a game about cute harem girls doing cute harem things.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Also, arguably, this could be Himawari's inception moment (sex during christmas' eve, after the second reset):
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
The second chapter is when the foreshadowing of Ayane being pregnant is the strongest, although she already talks about pregnancy and being a mom at the end of chapter 1, especially in the baths ("Cold Air of an Encroaching Winter"). But since a reset would take the child away, it's unlikely she was pregnant then, so it would make sense for her to become now.
 

DeSkel15

Engaged Member
Sep 29, 2019
2,547
8,400
A really minor observation, but it came to my mind as someone commented recently that the number of happy events really lowered in chapter 4:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
As for the girls, most of them have around half of their events coming from chapter 1, but that's more understandable because A LOT of people get added from then on:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Finally, just to keep track, this is how we end chapter 1:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
**We've also met Todd, John, Noodles and Himawari (but this one will only have her official meeting a bit later, as Akira has no remembrance of her from the room with the clocks, scientific research or buying the scarf).
Noriko actually showed up in Chapter 1's Haruka Event:
Potentially still looking for Sensei who was right behind her...

Nope. Ergo bottom tier for me. :)

Serious question: would the two of them--or even Sekai--be as screwed up in the head without the resets? :unsure:
As screwed up? Probably not. The Resets seem to affect everyone, whether they realize it or not. Haunting their dreams and their minds at times. With some managing to acknowledge this, but being forced to pretend everything's normal to keep their sanity. Like how some girls have seen strange/traumatic things lately and basically just go on with their days afterwards.

Ami:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Nodoka:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Both girls were basically forced into an unhealthy Caretaker role when they should have been the ones being taken care of. It's likely fucked their mentality.

The supernatural aspects also likely have affected both girls their whole lives. With their families already being involved in whatever is going on.

Then the Resets more or less intensified their problems millions fold, while virtually stealing any chance they could have to grow from them.

Of course, whether any of these characters and their backstories actually existed before the Resets, isn't entirely clear.
----
As for Sekai:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

This supernatural stuff seems to go back at least 200 years, based off Yasu's religion being that old from a 2020 (Year of The Resets) perspective. It definitely goes back to when Sekai's and Sensei's parents were teens. In other words: We're at least on Generation 3 (Ami's Gen) of this story. (Himawari might be from Gen 4?)
 
Last edited:

Moonflare

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2023
1,606
7,143
Noriko actually showed up in Chapter 1's Haruka Event:
Potentially still looking for Sensei who was right behind her...
Yes, but she wasn't introduced.

You can see Io in the same manner when Ami takes Akira to the mall, and says she's going to look for a job. Most of them appear in that way, however, until the end of chapter 1, all main characters are introduced to Akira with the exception of Noriko.

Io talks to him directly when he goes to the baths with Ayane, and Yasu does the same (two times over) but more importantly when she talks to Sana about her brother. Noriko is the only one that never engages Akira directly until the end of season 1 (understandably so, as that's the point of her later introduction scene).

Edit: unrelated to the point but I've uploaded a few more signatures (under the general category), from screenshots I took from season 1. I have yet to make the character signatures with the screenshots I took because I'm lazy and I have to input their names and that takes a little more time.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
 
Last edited:

Bingoogus

Engaged Member
Sep 5, 2021
3,554
9,299
But in all seriousness, this to me shows again that early Ami and this Ami is are very different characters.
I do find it somewhat silly that you and everyone in your camp plus everyone who falls into Mooney's camp can ever claim or at least assume any degree of likelihood to either possibility. What Mooney showed was there is an explanation that can fit that suggests Ami has been aware all along, but it's all unprovable, no evidence definitively pointing one way or the other currently exists, the two theories rely on interpretations of the same evidence... so i ain't taking a stance, either works, both fit, no way to know which is right so it just feels foolish to me for anyone to even lean a certain way, reeks of bias and cherry picking to fit a preconceived and preferred outcome...

This is something i see quite often in this thread, lost in the joy of theorycrafting i feel too many people lose the forest for the trees... this isn't a personal attack or anything, you just happened to be the latest person to rub that particular gripe of mine and forced me to throw out my usual 'hey guys, take a step back from this stuff for a second and remember the big picture' reminder.
 

Antosha

Active Member
Feb 28, 2018
582
815
Noticed this during my replay.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Yeah. That was one of the bits that made me think about the question of how much reset knowledge if any Ami has at that point. If she were trying to get Akira worked up, you'd think she'd have teased him with this possibility, knowing how he'd respond.
I do find it somewhat silly that you and everyone in your camp plus everyone who falls into Mooney's camp can ever claim or at least assume any degree of likelihood to either possibility. What Mooney showed was there is an explanation that can fit that suggests Ami has been aware all along, but it's all unprovable, no evidence definitively pointing one way or the other currently exists, the two theories rely on interpretations of the same evidence... so i ain't taking a stance, either works, both fit, no way to know which is right so it just feels foolish to me for anyone to even lean a certain way, reeks of bias and cherry picking to fit a preconceived and preferred outcome...

This is something i see quite often in this thread, lost in the joy of theorycrafting i feel too many people lose the forest for the trees... this isn't a personal attack or anything, you just happened to be the latest person to rub that particular gripe of mine and forced me to throw out my usual 'hey guys, take a step back from this stuff for a second and remember the big picture' reminder.
Yeah. I get what you're saying. The tunnel vision is one of the problems with theorizing about a work in progress: confirmation bias is almost impossible to avoid. But hey! Theorizing is fun, and, LiL almost demands it, and at this point we can't be sure where the game is headed. So damn the torpedoes and full speed ahead! ;)

(As long as we all remember that these theories are hypotheses, not yet established textual fact.)
 
Last edited:
4.10 star(s) 313 Votes