What we can consider is that Ami and Noriko may have 1 year and 1 month and 3 days of age difference so Noriko is at least alive in that part of the game, BUT I don't think even Selly would make Noriko 1 year old spying on Niki and Akira
The fastest way in-game is to kill Metal Slimes. It's still a tedious grind to get the 2 million (and they aren't sex scenes, just joke text).
Yeah, that's why I think that the event was a mix of three different things and part 2 (where Ami is a unborn child) happened years before part 1.
I genuinely don't even know if I prefer this to be canon, I hope it's just an error and that it's fixed, this is really messing with my head, I'm rereading some events trying to see if we miscalculated something in the timeline, but No, it just seems like it was an error. I at least hope that if it's a real part of the game I hope Selly somehow explains why this made the timeline more complicated than it already is.
> It's kind of insane how much absurd psychoanalysis people will unload on you simply because you want a game to be negative in experience as well as content sometimes.
Sure, it could actually be way more complicated, with splitting and converging timelines going back to Yuu's era. So Sekai and Nozomu might be (sort of) half-siblings from parallel timelines.
Yeah, absurd psychoanalysis. Minds are infinite in their complexity and motives are infinite in their arbitrariness. Going around making absent-minded theories as to the inner workings of someone's mind and explaining behavior in a way convenient to you is pretty absurd. If you did that to people in real life they'd punch you in the face or otherwise ostracize you. Ever heard of the fundamental attribution error? It's a bias in which people observing others explain behavior by identifying them as "fundamental attributes," like someone kicking a vending machine to get a drink is just "an angry person" and that's why they're kicking the machine. Whereas if they are the one kicking the machine they instead explain it with momentary or circumstantial reasons, like, "I'm not an angry person today is just a bad day." The position that authors are in is one where thousands of readers are constantly psycho-analyzing them and reading into statements and assigning them fundamental attributes to explain any given act of behavior. That is more depressing than anything. And so far from Selebus being a particular misanthrope in this regard, it's weird people online being weird but not getting the normal social rebukes since it's the internet.> It's kind of insane how much absurd psychoanalysis people will unload on you simply because you want a game to be negative in experience as well as content sometimes.
"Spending years thinking about depressing shit 24/7 might make a person depressed" == "absurd psychoanalysis"?
I remember when the game was first coming out, he said as much on the discord - that he found it very emotionally draining to write certain scenes like Rin's manic episodes and felt like some of the characters were "daughters" to him and honestly, back then the game didn't have nearly as much fucked up content as it does these days
> As if making people grind for SENSEI QUEST is the greatest affront known to man and makes you an irritable miser
I didn't say a thing about Sensei Quest or the grind. I do not care about the grind because I am skipping it
When I'm referring to him as insufferable, I'm talking about how he treats people on his discord: he's just a dickhead at times
> Most authors will think their readers are retarded but keep it to themselves and try to manipulate them with faux friendliness like every corporation out there. It SHOULD be a breath of fresh air to have an auteur openly argue about their ideas and put them to the test - they say only the best friends fight on a rooftop and smile about it after
You're missing the point: it's not the fact that he argues, but rather the manner in which he does so, if you want to even call it "argument". I think you're referring to argument in the idealized sense of philosophical debate - that is not what he engages in
hahaha, now I'm thinking about it, firstly she asks if he still has the condoms, which means she knows he might not have them, which means she might think he threw them away or used them, secondly why would Akira be carrying condoms with him and showing them to Niki when he had already been refusing to have sex with her for 1 years? third: Why did Selly make this event so confusing in this part of Niki?
This is a pretty minor point, but it's nice to nail down the timeline: I don't think the accident could have happened in 2011. In "Dear You", which takes place sometime between Halloween and Christmas in Chapter 2, Niki says that it's been eight years since they've done anything sexual.
So all lessons in love is just about Akira and his schizophrenia, got it.Look at this screenshot.
There is a real chance none of these people existYou don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
In fact, only Niki may not exist. Maya was spoken of as something that shouldn't exist. She exists, but she is an Error, which means that she exists but she shouldn't, what makes her exist. Sekai's spirit is a god/spirit which makes her exist as a new existence that is not human, This Sekai spirit is the manifestation of fears and the way the traumatized Akira saw Sekai, and since she was his world, perhaps he even considered her a goddess made this Sekai spirit/goddess exist in the world.Look at this screenshot.
There is a real chance none of these people existYou don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Who's Nodoka? [re:zero ptsd intensifies]
