I think there’s a lot of thought provoking ideas in that post for sure. But the pretentious responses to people’s analysis and criticism ain’t doing any favors. I’m all about that looking down on idiots kind of life (something I’m constantly working on), so I get the “nobody can keep up with me!” ethos. But it does make enemies rather than converts when trying to make salient points.
Generally, I found the English a bit incoherent at times, and had some difficulty following as a result, but not so much that I couldn’t understand the points being made. I think the main issue is not having enough textual based support for suppositions, not that the ideas aren’t plausible or worth considering.
All in all, it’s a fascinating read, and gives me another lens with which to view the game from as I play through for the third time.