Black Raven
Member
- May 4, 2020
- 146
- 232
- 103
Unlikely that Lessons in Love would be the first then although that trial would be fun to watch.I think that's still an open question legally speaking, hasn't really been tested in courts.
Real people is with respect to the child pornography (and also subscribestar doesn't allow real porn at all to avoid the record keeping requirements). Points 1, 2, 3, and 6 in that image are all things this game or associated content contains. Arguably 5 as well.
I don't think so, no. Just because they felt the need to be specific about ** doesn't imply that they're not only talking about real stuff elsewhere. By default "bestiality" (for example) means "bestiality", not "bestiality and also all fictional depictions of it on all supports".I wasn't talking about the ** part. The custom renders feature beastiality, animal cruelty, and rape, and the game features incest, self-harm, suicide, and a fuckton of "filthy or disgusting words or pictures."
All of which is against SS TOS.
It would just be plain absurd to ban fake bestiality/rape/incest but not fake **.
For reference, here is the Patreon version :
Of course SS could still remove LiL at any point using the more ambiguous parts of their ToS like "Filthy, or disgusting words or pictures" or even "obscene or immoral purpose". But like Worthless Peon said, that would be a very dumb decision in terms of business as of right now.Patreon ToS said:we have zero tolerance when it comes to the glorification of sexual violence which includes bestiality, rape, and child exploitation (i.e., sexualized depiction of minors). This is true for illustrated, animated, or any other type of creations.