- Mar 18, 2018
- 759
- 362
Nice large update.
My only negative is the random slave system using a range of folders as a grouping, because their contents are not in order or groups.
There are major outliers in the folders if going by groups of folder names or a range of folder names simply going by age, body type, or whatever.
I understand the dev first wanting to get a decent working engine under the hood before tweaking and refining, and for wanting to use less lines of coding.
It is ok, it can be very easily refined later, just more lines of coding with smaller folder groupings or strait out specific folder/av###.
My only negative is the random slave system using a range of folders as a grouping, because their contents are not in order or groups.
There are major outliers in the folders if going by groups of folder names or a range of folder names simply going by age, body type, or whatever.
I understand the dev first wanting to get a decent working engine under the hood before tweaking and refining, and for wanting to use less lines of coding.
It is ok, it can be very easily refined later, just more lines of coding with smaller folder groupings or strait out specific folder/av###.