Feminizing Andrew for revenge is where I'm struggling to see the logic behind it. If this was all about revenge for Andrew losing Marina's money, does it really make sense for the family to spend even more money just to punish Andrew? If they can afford to throw away money just to humiliate and punish someone, then the money wasn't really that important to them, right?
If it is really just about removing Andrew from Marina's life, why turn him into her aunt? If the family sees Andrew as someone who is untrustworthy, why put him in a position of power where as the wife of Nikos, he could cause even more financial harm? If Nikos hated Andrew for what he did to his niece, why would he have wanted to turn him into his wife? How could he trust someone like that? Did Nikos and Marina plan on being able to just erase Andrew's old memories and identity? How could they have know that was even a possibility?
Going back through it all, and with this new part, I've altered my take to streamline it down. I think:
1) Andrew screwed up and lost all of Marina and his money. But they've bounced back since then, and generally Marina has forgiven him but doesn't necessarily trust him.
2) I don't think feminizing Andrew was preplanned because if it were, basically every scenario requires Marina to have been in on the plot at the beginning. Either it's something like that chain of assumptions you made about a split personality (which I have a hard time believing). We have way more evidence suggesting all of this is surprising to her too, so I really don't think she's in on it. I mean, her primary reason about being upset right now is Elena sleeping with Nikos. It seems like that shouldn't be surprising if you knew the plot was the turn your husband into your aunt.
3) I
do think that Nikos has a fetish for feminized men. He's way too eager to doing this roleplay.
4) I also think that Nikos saw an opportunity/made an opportunity when he brought up his old story and suggested Andrew dress up.
5) Given how they've treated both of them, I'm just gonna assume Nikos (and maybe his daughters too) just simply don't have a lot of respect for Andrew or Marina. They paid for the honeymoon due to being family, but just look at the way they've treated them. They've turned Andrew into a sextoy and basically laugh in Marina's face about it. Before, I considered that they were doing this to Andrew
for Marina, but you know what: I'm thinking they're doing it
to both of them.
What's the motivation? Well, this wouldn't be the first story (fictional or in real life) where a toxic family member takes it upon themselves for "punishing" their "loser" family member. Especially if it's one of those families that believes that having a shameful member of the family is bringing shame on to them.
Marina's apparently just a fledgling journalist. And she's married to an aspiring actor. One who lost all their savings. Couple that with some misogynistic attitudes towards women and you'd have everything you'd need to justify torturing the poor girl.
She's angry at Elena, not Andrew, not Nikos, so I'm really at a loss to understand her POV.
Now that we've clarified the timescales, I can see where her anger is coming from.
- Andrew lost all their money and apparently has some excuse that she generally accepts. But you wouldn't blame her for not fully trusting him anymore.
- Fast forward and Marina speaks to Elena at the hospital, agree upon a code word, and are now essentially the only ones on each other's side. Elena is the one that insists everyone treat her like Elena.
- The very next day, at the party, Elena starts ignoring the code word they agreed upon. And then, Elena leaves for a romantic trip where she fucks Nikos and plans a wedding.
From her POV, it really looks like there is no "Andrew", and rather, Andrew is effectively "coming out" but gaslighting her. It reminds me a bit of a situation. A married guy's best friend moved in with him while he and his wife were in a bit of a rough patch. He started not telling his wife about various school events and such, taking the best friend to them instead. The married guy kept insisting they were just really good friends, and it's just like a "brotherly bond". But it was clear that he was just in love with his best friend and was trying to replace the mother from the kid's life. Bare minimum it was clearly an emotional affair. That was a whole shitshow and he kept gaslighting the wife about how she was seeing things that weren't there. Except they were there, and behold, after he came out, he just flipped it and was accusing her of being intolerant of his sexuality.
Now, I completely agree that her not blaming Nikos is a bit weird. Maybe she doesn't feel as betrayed by Nikos because at some point, she'd already written him off as not being on her side. But she held out hope Elena/Andrew was until the whole "I'm getting married and btw I fucked your uncle".
I am thinking more about the @Stevedore100 theory of this being something like a movie or a soap opera where Andrew has lost himself within his character's role.
The weird thing to me was I was convinced the "not hypnosis" thing was going to be this whole "lost in character due to method acting", but with all we've learned now about the timeline, there isn't really time for that to have occurred.
If the timeline is as Thalantyr laid out (and I do think it's correct), then this means, there's literally no point where Andrew disassociated and was Elena. Andrew is currently missing an afternoon's worth of memories, but there's no significant time left where Nikos was interacting with an "Elena/Aphrodite" personality.
We do know that Andrew is "mode locked", in the whole can't speak English and especially during sex where he's often behaving based on how he think Elena
should behave rather than behaving because he wants to behave that way. And maybe this is splitting hairs, but it feels like Aphrodite isn't really a seperate personality as much as a representation of the character Andrew has created and is emulating. To the point that he's unable to break out of emulating that character.
The reason why I'm making this distinction is that I don't think the Aprodite character is ever able to "take over"/"pilot" Andrew/Elena's body. Nor do I think that personality has their own distinct set of memories. Now, this latest chapter could torpedo this interpretation: The sex dungeon scene suggests Aphrodite having more of a distinct existence than I would have assumed. But if that dream sequence is present day, and it's only the flash back that's in the past, then I still feel strongly that Aprhodite isn't necesarily a seperate personality, but rather the metaphysical representation of how Andrew is visualizing "Elena". As such, being punished by Elena would be fitting as now that he's trapped as Elena in this conspiracy, he's effectively being punished in the real world by Elena.