- Aug 17, 2019
- 5,617
- 9,048
I mean, I genuinely don't understand the mindset of "it mustn't be there at all, or I won't play" when it's entirely possible to just say no from the get-go (or just straight up reject the trans LI when the option of furthering their relationship comes around.).Optional sharing (or NTR) doesn't make a, total, difference because a lot of people think that the LI's should, by the very nature of their relationships with the MC, be against interacting with any cock other than the MC's. Meaning that they would never be okay with it under any circumstances. Also, if the MC has the capability to be a cuck and let his girls get railed by someone else, that is going to be a huge immersion breaker for a lot of people as well.
Personally, my preference would be to have no (sexual) interaction between the t-girl and the other LIs, but if there absolutely must be, then I think the best course of action is just to make a switch at the beginning of the game that will disable all of the t-girl options and railroad players on to the total non-LI path with that character. Players who don't want trans content aren't likely to change their minds part way through anyway. Additionally, I would also recommend not ever having H-scenes with Diana and/or Eisley and the t-girl, since they both have deeper pre-existing relationships with the MC.
Ultimately, it's your game and you can do what you want. But if you're going to make a harem game and then have more than one cock in the hen house, you should expect some backlash.
That all said, the game looks really good, so keep up the good work.
The trans character is only going to be involved with the other girls if the player themselves chooses to do so. It's there simply for those who might enjoy it. Nothing with the trans LI is forced (sans Renee early on, but Renee isn't an LI. And that's going to be adjusted pre-Steam release.), the trans LI can also simply be an LI and only be a bottom/sub for the MC. If the player doesn't want trans content, they can just say no to Ivy (the trans LI) when the moment rolls around.
The MC isn't a cuck, nor is he going to be. He'll be doing the cucking to a certain douchebag. There's going to be two eventual choices. One to start dating her or not, then another will come with the MC contemplating if she wants her involved with other girls. Basically, yes or no questions for both. Obviously, answering no to the second will lock her out of sexual content with other LIs. Whether she's romantically/sexually involved with MC or not, Ivy is still very much a story-heavy character. So, she's going to exist in the story even if the MC isn't dating her.
There seems to be this idea that, and maybe it's my fault for not conveying it clearly enough, the trans LI is being forced onto players when it's entirely optional. Just because it exists doesn't mean it's going to be forced onto you. It exists for those who enjoying. Nothing more, nothing less. The goal is to make everything optional, or as close to it as possible. I get it if people don't like the content, hence it being optional, but if you have issues with the option of something existing, I think that says more about you (not you personally, just generally speaking.) than it does anything else.
There shouldn't be backlash for a choice or optional fetish. Ignore it and keep playing, or don't. But throwing a tantrum because you don't like the option of a trans LI is nothing short of entitled.
Edit: This post is no longer valid. Choice for trans content will now be at the beginning of the VN.
Last edited: