That's nice of you to share, but that has nothing to do with the post you're replying to.
I politely dissent, you wrote:
they're confused about why the corruption path is arbitrarily locked to sharing
and honestly i just expressed my feeling about that. For me there isn't anything to be confused since you have romance path that leads to corrupt and romance of other characters and pure corruption one for which ones you don't have any romantic feel. The latter leads to have those characters to get laid with other people too and MC doesn't care at all because, well, he doesn't have any romantic interest in them.
You could think and prefer differently but i think that's what the dev had in mind and imho it works, if you don't want any sharing you should stick to the proper path instead of asking the author to change what has in mind for his game. I only agree with the fact that a bit of warning could help for people like you that doesn't want to see that kind of content (and that's fair) but that saied the author isn't forcing anything in those routes and making a third route for all characters to have them corrupted while MC has no interest in them but they for some strange reason acts like their faithful brides seems like silly and maybe even redundant to me, also it basically would be a huge waste of development time for such very specific audience. Most people doesn't even want that, they just doesn't expect those outcomes and with a bit of warning they will just play happily the romance routes without needing of overthinking the paths.
So yeah, i think that was relevant to your reply. But that saied you have expressed your toughts and i've done the same now, they have the same relevance and i think dev will read and among all the others feedbacks will make his mind above this topic, no need to escalate the discussion since the final decision should be the creator's one.
