blkcrow20

Engaged Member
Nov 5, 2023
3,189
6,152
Fuck man.....Well with betty and memaw, Betty still walked in on Memaw sucking mc off right? Couldn't you just add a way where betty or memaw would like to fuck with an older grandma age lady to keep up with the mc? without being to close to the related section? Fuck man I really thought the threesome with those 2 would have been really interesting.....aahdsaifsgbusg oh well I guess....you never really ever see gilfs in porn at all if you guys are wondering why I'm wanting it to happen lmao.
I agree, you don't see it often enough. But Trop needs to abide by their rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KrusherKev

TonyMurray

Forum Fanatic
Apr 8, 2024
4,041
6,899
Unfortunately, that threesome won't happen because they are related in the unpatched version, so Patreon would ban me.
Other X-somes that won't happen:
Kiara+Eileen
Samantha+Simone
Debbie+Lisa
(Betty or Meemaw) + Norah
Saira + Kalyani (Student from the last batch)

Betty's scene had 18 animations (in 5 sets) and over 4,150 renders. I hardly will go beyond that for a single scene.
This does raise an interesting question though (and of course it's in jest, because I think the processing power to render the scene, plus the posing, writing, etc. would be too much!)... when we get the inevitable game-ending orgy, how do we decide who will be involved? While all the other girls are getting themselves ready for it, will we have Eileen and Kiara; Norah, Betty, and Meemaw; Samantha and Simone, etc. playing rock, paper, scissors to see who can go in and join them and who has to sit it out?
 

jI11jaCksjAkk

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2023
1,274
2,794
Blame it on Patreon. :devilish:
Trop needs to abide by their rules.
Personally, I would love to see a Kiara/Eileen scene. But it's Trope's game and so his choice to make. It is what it is. You can't please all of the people all of the time. But I think it's probably time to ease off the knee-jerk blaming of Patreon for everything in May 2025.

I have posted many a rant about Patreon and their cowardice in caving to the demands of payment processing services (letting the middle-men who contribute NOTHING run the asylum), and even worse stabbing their existing creators in the back with the sudden radical change in their T.O.S. after those creators helped make the platform successful in the first place. But it is only fair (and balanced? :sick::sick::sick:) to point out that enough time has passed now since the Great Purge that pointing the finger at Patreon as 100% responsible for how games are today is no longer really fair.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
If a dev leaves X or Y or Z out of their games today, I think it's fair to say that it is a dev choice to do so because they want to be on Patreon, not Patreon 'forcing' any dev to leave anything out. The censorship vs. income choice is a difficult one, and one that causes every dev a lot of angst, and it is a choice only they have the right to make and we don't have any grounds to complain about whatever choices they end up making for their stories. But outside of shameful sneak-attacks by content platforms, it is a choice made by devs, not platforms.
 
Last edited:

blkcrow20

Engaged Member
Nov 5, 2023
3,189
6,152
But Patreon is still the biggest site for devs to get the most exposure. No other site comes close. If Trop switched to using just SS, he would have a dramatic drop in subs. It's not so simple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HornyyPussy

jI11jaCksjAkk

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2023
1,274
2,794
But Patreon is still the biggest site for devs to get the most exposure. No other site comes close. If Trop switched to using just SS, he would have a dramatic drop in subs. It's not so simple.
What about that garbled diarrhea of prose full of conditionals that I posted implied that I was saying it was simple? :ROFLMAO: I can't even write a simple post, much less make hard real-life choices like that.

I'm just saying it has been long enough since the changes on that platform were made that anyone there in May 2025 is there by conscious choice and is at least partially complicit in the restrictions to their work that come with making that choice. Not a criticism, and definitely not saying anything about it is simple. (y)
 
  • Like
Reactions: blkcrow20
4.00 star(s) 137 Votes