Voice actors record their voices which is work. They're actors. To actors, removing said work is disrespectful toward their fellow colleagues who put into that work and she values said work enough to keep it in. Having already recorded the lines does not take away the fact it is work rendered in minutes or in hours.
Eh..... I would have agreed with that maybe 20 years ago but I've known too many (voice) actors personally & learned of many other actors that are all very
very extreme, ultra over-paid primadonnas who are an absolute disgrace to what the profession used to be. These days I would go so far as to say the vast majority of them are like that and for that reason, I do not respect them nor the work they do.
Yes it's still work but they're absolute pieces of shit nearly across the board. Why worry ? not to mention that the editor would be doing the work rather than the voice actors in this case. The other guy is right and you are very very wrong on many levels, probably because you're lying and lying poorly.
....
The real answer is; They refuse to release a '
no male audio' because they don't want to and they don't want to because they're assholes [So are we btw]. That's it. That's all you need. There's nothing with that. It's their property and they can do with it as they wish but presenting it as if they're part of some sort of 'noble profession' with 'values' and deserve 'respect'.... that's complete bullshit.
Any adult can & will see right through that so not sure why you rolled with it. Just saying.
