JoeSte91
Member
- Apr 12, 2018
- 262
- 502
I'm enjoying what I'm seeing so far. I played Netoria Tactics 1 and it was a great game with some obvious issues which Netoria Tactics 2 seems to be improving on. The story already feels more thought out and stable, and the character dynamics are different enough from the first game to be interesting, since the motivations is less 'let's do this because otherwise we die in this dungeon' to 'there's an actual reward at the end if we can all pull this off'. Combat seems more in-depth too. With more consistent art, overall it's looking like a great step forward. So I just want to say right off that I appreciate the work that has gone into it so far.The setting in Netoria 1 wasn't really planned like most of the narrative elements. Netoria 2 went through much more pre-production.
In Act 1, there are three outcomes that can happen. Zaman and Shah stick together, Zaman gets together with Vashti and Shah with Azar, or Zaman and Shah break up with no further coupling. Both Zaman and Shah staying together and being NTRd have the same amount of content.
The portrayl of those events is heavily flavored by what POV you're on. Azar won't be able to see Zaman+Shah scenes directly for example. And the end of Act 1 has a bunch of POV exclusive scenes setting up the story for Act 2.
The above passage should answer some of this, like how in Act 1 all POVs are playing around the same events from different perspectives.
In Act 2 things branch off way more, with the setup done the game becomes about the POV characters really getting into their personal journey and their battle with their POV villain. The way I think you should look at it is essentially the POV system is letting the various routes of the game be much more different than they could have been in Netoria 1. Because they never have to interact what happens on Zaman POV can be drastically different than what happens on Shah POV.
For example, Zaman is a TF focused character. He's a woman for all of Act 2. So all the storylines on his POV in that act revolve around his transformation. But if you play Shah POV, none of that happens and instead it's all about Shah's journey to become a more assertive and confident person, or her failure to. So whichever POV content you find interesting, the whole POV is going to be about that content. There's not really sprinkles of various fetishes or anything. Zaman is all about MtF TF, Shah is all about sharing content (and femboy stuff if you want, it's mostly asthetic), Azar is all about netori, and Vashti is a little more complecated but she's mostly about domination/being dominated.
Concerning Zaman in act 2, I do think there should be a choice between traditional NTR focus and TF focus. By shifting completely to TF focus for Zaman, I think it's under cutting some of the NTR perspective for that POV. Maybe I just need to see it executed, and I'm the type of person that would play both paths to see all the content whether it's for me or not, but if the choice of POV is intended to correspond to a choice between netorare, netorase, netori, then focusing on the TF development for Zaman is likely to water down the netorare, whereas it seems like the netorase and netori are unaffected by their act 2 personal character developments. It really depends on who the intended audience is for this game. I know there was a strong fan base in Netoria Tactics 1 for FemCarwyn, but as I said, it was a choice for the players of how deep they wanted to go into TF or NTR.