condomlancer
Member
- Mar 20, 2022
- 148
- 183
- 166
Some of his latest images look AIBut that Doric image looked like it was made by AI... such a shame cause I loved Doric and usualy I am a fan of any NSFW art made of her.
Doric deserve sooo many R34 ♥But that Doric image looked like it was made by AI... such a shame cause I loved Doric and usualy I am a fan of any NSFW art made of her.
It seems more like 3d/Photobashing stuff to me. The cock for example looks like a movie still paintover, and actually the face as well.But that Doric image looked like it was made by AI... such a shame cause I loved Doric and usualy I am a fan of any NSFW art made of her.
Yep it is photobashing as you can see hereIt seems more like 3d/Photobashing stuff to me. The cock for example looks like a movie still paintover, and actually the face as well.
It's like he used an image from some porn movie, blurred or applied some photoshop filter, then painted over it. The fact that he adds film grain to his works would be perfect to hide photobashing texture difference between paint strokes and grainy sources for example.
Thank you for confirming my suspectsYep it is photobashing as you can see here
And here I thought he was just that good at drawingHere's others I found
I think he does still technically draw it, just uses them as a base referenceAnd here I thought he was just that good at drawing![]()
LOL never knew this was in question.. figured we all knew that.Yep it is photobashing as you can see here
Well apparently not.LOL never knew this was in question.. figured we all knew that.
It's not technically drawing. It's drawing. Maybe using references isn't as impressive as drawing completely from your head. (which is very hard if you want the actresses to look the same) Even with references, reproducing a face on his level is still damn hard. If someone has never tried to draw something like that themselves (which I did) they don't know how hard it is.I think he does still technically draw it, just uses them as a base reference
It doesn't have to be Photoshop. It could be Gimp, Krita or some other graphics program where you can actually draw.If I wanted to make photo bash art like ninja, could I it in clip studio or do I have to use photoshop?
It doesn't have to be Photoshop. It could be Gimp, Krita or some other graphics program where you can actually draw.
But let's clear up the misunderstanding. What he does is not photobashing. He just traces faces. Maybe something else, but not that much in relation to the whole work. First of all, it will be hard for him to find a photo for all his backgrounds, monsters, their stomachs and tentacles, some of the poses of the characters. I'm sure he draws most of it from his head.
This comment about applying filters is just slander based on ignorance. Even the faces he draws are not recreated 1 to 1, which is what filters would do. Not to mention the tragic quality of these photos, overexposure and lost detail. I myself also when I was editing his works I also looked at his work carefully enough to see the methods in which he draws certain things. It was a good lesson for me. I would have seen it if it was a filter.
Ninja draws and his oil paintings, and track record are enough to prove that he has the skills to do it. If you want to draw at his level, you have to devote many years of practice in drawing.