I dunno man, your guess is as good as mine, already pointed out myself how dumb it is and I'm done replying.Why the fuck is there a debate on ethicality being made on a porn forum where we all unethically steal porn games, get a grip lads
Why the fuck is there a debate on ethicality being made on a porn forum where we all unethically steal porn games, get a grip lads
Like 3-4 pages back I made a comment about there being no ethical billionaire, and then the comment section did what it did. So someone on a pirate porn forum defended billionaires, and then things went further and further down the rabbit hole of 'define your terms!'I dunno man, your guess is as good as mine, already pointed out myself how dumb it is and I'm done replying.
There's something very fucking ironic about a person on a forum focused on pirated porn games defending billionaires.Like 3-4 pages back I made a comment about there being no ethical billionaire, and then the comment section did what it did. So someone on a pirate porn forum defended billionaires, and then things went further and further down the rabbit hole of 'define your terms!'
Maybe they are thinking if they were the billionaires, they would be ethical? What about you? if you suddenly became a billionaire would you be completely ethical?Like 3-4 pages back I made a comment about there being no ethical billionaire, and then the comment section did what it did. So someone on a pirate porn forum defended billionaires, and then things went further and further down the rabbit hole of 'define your terms!'
There's no way to get a billion+ dollars (or hold onto it) that is ethical. You either exploit thousands or millions of people, or, if you inherit/awarded it, you selfishly hold onto more money than you would ever need. There's no good, moral, or ethical reason one person should have $1B. A good person would start giving a lot of it away, and then they wouldn't continue to be a billionaire.Maybe they are thinking if they were the billionaires, they would be ethical? What about you? if you suddenly became a billionaire would you be completely ethical?
Couldn't have said it better myself honestly. I think people simply don't understand just how absurd $1B is.There's no way to get a billion+ dollars (or hold onto it) that is ethical. You either exploit thousands or millions of people, or, if you inherit/awarded it, you selfishly hold onto more money than you would ever need. There's no good, moral, or ethical reason one person should have $1B. A good person would start giving a lot of it away, and then they wouldn't continue to be a billionaire.
Universal Gallery Unlocker should work for it, works with 99% of renpy games.Any gallery mod?
Mood, that being said, I'd still do coke off a stripper's assIts all autistic or at least ego to get the last word(says something about what we'd all do with large resources.). Any of you could have stopped at anytime and let the convo die...
Though this is a good test of morality that applies even in this game which is the "X-men problem". How does the world fair when peoples base instincts don't change but their power does? Usually doesn't end well but things like the MTF have illustrated the problems of knee-jerk reactions.
Bold of you to assume I'm not now.Mood, that being said, I'd still do coke off a stripper's ass
While I don't disagree with your premise (billionaires should use their money to help the less fortunate) can I ask where do you draw the line is it only billionaires that should do this what about hundred millionaires how about just millionaires what if you have $500 in your pocket and some ask you to give them $5 are you a bad person if you don't give them the $5.There's no way to get a billion+ dollars (or hold onto it) that is ethical. You either exploit thousands or millions of people, or, if you inherit/awarded it, you selfishly hold onto more money than you would ever need. There's no good, moral, or ethical reason one person should have $1B. A good person would start giving a lot of it away, and then they wouldn't continue to be a billionaire.
Seriously enough. You can talk about the relationship between morals and ethics and how laws are derived from morals and are thus ethical frameworks as they're externalized and whether they are more right than morals in general or just more powerful and how that power comes from consensus and whether consensus is even a valid source of morality at all and if so where does it breakdown and what of individuals who have more power from resources and the morality of how they came to those resources due to the near impossibility of relocating that volume of resources without exploiting either people or systems and whether systems deserve moral consideration somewhere else.While I don't disagree with your premise (billionaires should use their money to help the less fortunate) can I ask where do you draw the line is it only billionaires that should do this what about hundred millionaires how about just millionaires what if you have $500 in your pocket and some ask you to give them $5 are you a bad person if you don't give them the $5.
I almost certainly will never be rich and I don't know anyone who could be considered rich so I have zero skin in the game and I don't want to play straw man because like I said at the beginning I do agree with your statement I guess I just am not a fan of blanket statements.
I also want to make clear that I do believe the vast majority of billionaire are greedy and only care about making more money which is sad cause in one hour they make more interest on their money then I will make in a year but that's life I guess.
Seriously enough. You can talk about the relationship between morals and ethics and how laws are derived from morals and are thus ethical frameworks as they're externalized and whether they are more right than morals in general or just more powerful and how that power comes from consensus and whether consensus is even a valid source of morality at all and if so where does it breakdown and what of individuals who have more power from recourses and the morality of how they came to those resources due to the near impossibility of relocating that volume of resources without exploiting either people or systems and whether systems deserve moral consideration somewhere else.
Go to a general off-topic thread. The other near impossibility is that this thread hasn't been nuked yet.
I mean atleast it has some relevance to the game given that it isn't exactly shy with the whole Big Deep State Shady and Big Pharma looming in the background, so F95 atleast did somewhat good.Came in here to discuss theories and superhero pussy. Instantly confronted with a debate on morals vs. ethics. 11/10. Never change, F95.