lucadiadis

Active Member
May 25, 2018
554
915
Does anyone know which persons / pornstars the characters might be based on or are a mix of?

* Lena
* Holly
* Cindy
* Emma: Abella Danger?
* Louise:
* Cherry:
* Ivy:
* Jessica:
* Gillian: Anny Aurora?
* Minerva
Lena is a mix of Lana Rhoades, the videos of whom many lewd scenes have been based upon....
1720196779565.png
....An Sybil for some facial expressions and body moves


Cindy is indeed Nancy A, Stevie Wonder was right on that one

Emma is indeed Abella.

Ivy is a tricky one, but her face always reminded of that one, name is Krystal Boyd

You did not ask, but Alison is the late August Ames

I have absolutely no idea whether Holly, Louise, Cherry, Jess, Gillian are based on a porn star.
 

KristopheH

Member
Mar 8, 2018
469
1,133
Does anyone know which persons / pornstars the characters might be based on or are a mix of?

* Lena
* Holly
* Cindy
* Emma: Abella Danger?
* Louise:
* Cherry:
* Ivy:
* Jessica:
* Gillian: Anny Aurora?
* Minerva
* Lena - Various, but mostly Lana Rhoades, Luxury Girl, and Shaiden Rogue
* Holly - Can't remember the name, but it's been discussed in the thread before. Use Search.
* Cindy - Nancy Ace (aka Nancy A)
* Emma - Abella Danger
* Louise - Dunno
* Cherry - Cecilia Lion
* Ivy - Dunno
* Jessica - Karma Rx
* Gillian - Dunno
* Minerva - Dunno. Maybe Alexis Fawx?
 

bonerland

Active Member
Dec 28, 2017
563
848
* Lena - Various, but mostly Lana Rhoades, Luxury Girl, and Shaiden Rogue
* Holly - Can't remember the name, but it's been discussed in the thread before. Use Search.
* Cindy - Nancy Ace (aka Nancy A)
* Emma - Abella Danger
* Louise - Dunno
* Cherry - Cecilia Lion
* Ivy - Dunno
* Jessica - Karma Rx
* Gillian - Dunno
* Minerva - Dunno. Maybe Alexis Fawx?
Cherry is Scarlet Scandal. You can tell by the nose. Holly is almost certainly Riley Reid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pede rasta 1

robrize2169

Well-Known Member
Oct 8, 2022
1,627
3,375
Holly kind of reminds me of the wife in the html game about a married guy that has a poor relationship with his red head wife but they have a kid together. you spend your time grinding to lvl up your relationship with her by doing chores around the house and spending more time with her and the son. sorry i forget the name of it atm. not a bad game but last time i tried to play i was getting tons of errors so i am waiting for next update to try it out again.
anyway the red head wife is kinda plain looking and Holly reminds me of her a bit.
 
  • Thinking Face
Reactions: varpep

jimul18

Member
Mar 10, 2019
255
1,317
I think I said this before but my wishlist (that will never come true) to improve/save the production:
  • shorten the overall length of the game as planned (4-6 more updates at most)
  • kill of one of the MC's (drowning or shark attack would be a good option at the moment)
  • commit to a clear update cycle (if there is only one MC 2-3 months per update)
  • get rid of the prologue, alpha, beta, final, epiloge plus three versions each bullshit -> Alpha, Beta, Final
  • start over with what you learned from ORS and GGGB (and what people liked about both games: writing, characters)
    • keep in mind that this is a interactive sexual VN (sexual is key and should come first, otherwise people here and most likely on the patreon would care nearly as much)
    • for the next game embrace AI generated art (with human improvements) and simplify the variables
    • include more long term planning in terms of writing, the gardening approach is fine for individual scenes and dialogue but the overall picture of where things progress to should be laid out beforehand
While all of this is controversial and a lot of people (including here) won't like it. Imho a dip in quality is worth the improvement in quantity. EK is still way ahead in terms of quality (writing and art) the problem with ORS as well as GGGB at the end is that they got overwhelmed with everything they had to juggle: variables, art, customization in GGGB (tattoos), writing, tying together all open threats. While my suggestions are not a be all and end all solution they might free up some stuff.
 

Gicoo

Active Member
Feb 18, 2018
980
2,529
shorten the overall length of the game as planned (4-6 more updates at most)
Could even happen if it ends up being 16 chapters instead of 20.

kill of one of the MC's
Waaay too late. There is too much established and too much planned for to drop either of them. The game would be unrecognizable.
Closest would be to make some NPCs disappear if they are not routes yet, rather than including them in every chapter. If Louise isn't dating Lena (and Ian isn't responding in the current chapter), she could decide to not return, because there is no purpose. Stan could leave if he is ignored or even kill himself.
commit to a clear update cycle
Pfft, why when you get more and over a longer time money with less updates?
get rid of the prologue, alpha, beta, final, epiloge
Its either 5 mini updates a year or one big update in one year. Doesn't matter if its split in 5 parts or in one, timewise. The difference is that Eva gets a bit more feedback and can change an update easier if its splitted, so they decided to split it.
start over with what you learned from ORS and GGGB
For the next game sure. But we are still 2/3 in the current game and you can barely change it now. Unless you favor a overwhaul. The chapter 9 redo was criticized enough. Repeating that regularly would bode ill for the production.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimul18 and varpep

jimul18

Member
Mar 10, 2019
255
1,317
Waaay too late. There is too much established and too much planned for to drop either of them. The game would be unrecognizable. Closest would be to make some NPCs disappear if they are not routes yet, rather than including them in every chapter. If Louise isn't dating Lena (and Ian isn't responding in the current chapter), she could decide to not return, because there is no purpose. Stan could leave if he is ignored or even kill himself.
I don't think it is too late for that, it would just piss off a lot of people. For example if you killed Ian, the Alison fans would be mad, the Cindy fans might still be salvageable since you could open up a (model) rivalry between Cindy and Lena.

Pfft, why when you get more and over a longer time money with less updates?
Well that opens up the whole "milking" debate. But getting a more consistent output might encourage patrons to return (like myself) or even motivate new one's. But I agree currently there is no incentive to change anything because the majority of her cucked patreons will support and shower her with praise no matter what.

Its either 5 mini updates a year or one big update in one year. Doesn't matter if its split in 5 parts or in one, timewise. The difference is that Eva gets a bit more feedback and can change an update easier if its splitted, so they decided to split it.
Well we would have to do another calculation if the last couple of updates are in line with previous ones in terms of quality and quantity. I tried doing that but it is arguable if that kind of calculation is even feasable since it it highly subjective (for me new art is the marker, for other lines of code).

For the next game sure. But we are still 2/3 in the current game and you can barely change it now. Unless you favor a overwhaul. The chapter 9 redo was criticized enough. Repeating that regularly would bode ill for the production.
Again this is subjective as this entire discussion, for me the redo didn't do enough to right the ship but rather introduce new hurdles and include some pointless stuff. But as we seem to be running out of conversation imho something needs to give.
 
4.60 star(s) 318 Votes