- Sep 1, 2020
- 200
- 173
Nah , it would ruin whole gameEva should skip Ian as MC
Nah , it would ruin whole gameEva should skip Ian as MC
Does anyone know the best way to write the book?
I remember seeing it here but cant find it.
can someone help?
The Gallery is done by PilotLara entirely on her free time and just because she's enthusiastic about it. She's not getting paid for it. Treat it as a fan mod, which is simply included into the game. The game IS Final, it's just the Gallery is a separate entity. If you click on the WIP entry, it does say that this Gallery, while endorsed by the creator, is not made by Eva Kiss and it's a one-person effort. If it wasn't for Lara, the game wouldn't have the Gallery at all.I'm disappointed that there are still missing scenes in the Gallery of this supposedly "Final" version.
For these curious: Ian can now pick up on Louise calling Lena her mistress, and learn about their relationship as a result. Also, a cheating Lena (or one that has MFM fantasy) can potentially angle for a future MFM threesome, now that Ian has gotten himself a FMF one.I've also added two new narrative scenes that weren't present in the Beta, nothing major, but it (..) detail a bit more of Ian and Lena's relationship.
I get that. Still, a little mention in Eva's post to let us know that the gallery's still incomplete, and maybe give an ETA, would have been nice.The Gallery is done by PilotLara entirely on her free time and just because she's enthusiastic about it. She's not getting paid for it. Treat it as a fan mod, which is simply included into the game. The game IS Final, it's just the Gallery is a separate entity. If you click on the WIP entry, it does say that this Gallery, while endorsed by the creator, is not made by Eva Kiss and it's a one-person effort. If it wasn't for Lara, the game wouldn't have the Gallery at all.
The ETA is "When it's ready". Eva can't rush Lara in any way without paying her, smh. Whenever she's free to work on it, she'll update it.I get that. Still, a little mention in Eva's post to let us know that the gallery's still incomplete, and maybe give an ETA, would have been nice.
You must be a gen Z with so much sense of entitlement.I get that. Still, a little mention in Eva's post to let us know that the gallery's still incomplete, and maybe give an ETA, would have been nice.
Then it's simply a matter of balance and Ian should have choices introduced that counter Lena, either preemptively or after the fact.For the competition to be fun you need to have an equal chance to "win". If the other player has unfair advantage over your fate (regardless if you choose to date Lena or not), then this "competition" is rigged from the start. If the option you asked for was possible, the player who plays as Lena could just corrupt your sweet Holly and you'd have no way to respond to that other than maybe call things off with Holly (assuming Ian even has an opportunity to learn about it). Basically you'd have no agency to counter Lena's actions or get back at her somehow. You couldn't compete with Lena because in that competition Lena always wins.
They only win by default because it was a glitch, so it was never designed to factor in the relative checks of how strong Ian/Holly's relationship is, how strong Holly/Lena's friendship is, how much of a cuck Ian is, whether Ian has talked about or looked at other 'hotter' women when Holly's nearby. (For instance, there's the very early example of Ian and Holly meeting Ian in the cafe and Holly comments on how pretty Lena is. Ian can agree or suggest that he's never noticed, or just comment on Holly being insecure. I don't know the code so I don't know how that's factored at the moment.)It's not a competition when one participant wins by default. Neither there's more depth -- i've mentioned it already, but having actions of both actors matter provides more possible paths/outcomes than one simply controlling the whole thing.
Note, the scenario described by BloodyMares does have room for active competition from both players over Holly. But it doesn't simply hand a win to one of them as soon as they decide to participate.
Isn't that an Urban Dictionary definition posted by some random person online, though? Not for nothing, but one person's post isn't exactly definitive. An open relationship means different things to different couples. Some are entirely open. Some have a set of ground rules. It's a bit of a flexible term really, depending on the parameters.It's not an open relationship then, it's just experimenting new things like threesomes
View attachment 2793229
Yes, but it made some people talk that this is how it should be, and that's specifically the model i'm opposing. Now, mind you, am not against Lena having option to try to influence/steal Holly at all -- certainly, it would add to the game to have it. I just think it should be done in a way you describe latter, with behavior and choices of both MCs shaping the outcome.They only win by default because it was a glitch
My Lena was like, 'Threesome...? Na. I'm not into that. Let's not bring it up with Ian.'For these curious: Ian can now pick up on Louise calling Lena her mistress, and learn about their relationship as a result. Also, a cheating Lena (or one that has MFM fantasy) can potentially angle for a future MFM threesome, now that Ian has gotten himself a FMF one.![]()
there's no Lena x Holly x Ian?My Lena was like, 'Threesome...? Na. I'm not into that. Let's not bring it up with Ian.'
And then she calls up Mike and has a Lena x Louise x Mike threesome.
It's in the works.there's no Lena x Holly x Ian?