Holly was uncalled for, but otherwise, summed up perfectly.Emma: not really interested in traditional relationship. Will happily "drink coffee" with anyone around.
Cindy: cheater
Allison: boring nag
Holly: boring bookworm
Minerva: another cheater
oh, also
Cherry: yet another cheater
Louise: will turn into a psycho if you as much as look at her
That doubt is very much warranted.![]()
Alison is perpetual trash. Everything about that character is pure distilled trash.maybe alison is the only option other than lena, but i will never choose her in my route, like you can't choose robert.
You're just jealous Lord Jordan Peterson isn't your father.You don't care about him because his parents support him.
It could be worse, she could live with Perry. Lucky her. Instead, she has Stan who will pay her rent for her and do her photoshoots for free.She has problems with rent
Ian got sexually assaulted by his older boss and had to make sacrifices for the sake of his career. Imagine your boss shows you his old flabby ballsack out of the blue and asks you to suck them bad boys if you want to keep your job. How'd you react?and has to make sacrifices to survive
Ian has the option between his friend's gf who's a cheater, his ex who's also a cheater, a bitch physically unable to stfu and who's tryna babytrap him at every corner. If he refuses her, she makes his best friend send him dick pics and harasses him with phone calls while getting spitroasted.dating assholes
Nothing wrong with homewreckers.Seems you haven't played the game yet. Neither Allison nor Holly are boring unless you only have a single interaction with them. And Cherry isn't even a cheater. If anything she's a homewrecker (which tbf is still really bad)
Never has more wrong opinions been uttered in the last sentence on this forum.You're just jealous Lord Jordan Peterson isn't your father.
It could be worse, she could live with Perry. Lucky her. Instead, she has Stan who will pay her rent for her and do her photoshoots for free.
Ian got sexually assaulted by his older boss and had to make sacrifices for the sake of his career. Imagine your boss shows you his old flabby ballsack out of the blue and asks you to suck them bad boys if you want to keep your job. How'd you react?
Ian has the option between his friend's gf who's a cheater, his ex who's also a cheater, a bitch physically unable to stfu and who's tryna babytrap him at every corner. If he refuses her, she makes his best friend send him dick pics and harasses him with phone calls while getting spitroasted.
Who's else? Emma? She's a homeless commie who lives off of liquid soap she steals from the pub.
This is simply not true. Lena can be a shrewd businesswoman in this pairing, fulfilling the contract and reaping the benefits, but without any illusions about Seymour's nature and without ever letting him touch her. She's walking a tight rope and she knows it, but it's interesting to see where it goes. I don't think there's anything vapid about her actions if you opt for this variant.Like Lena with Seymour, she just goes full vapid gold digger if she gives into him, the extreme.
Wits Lena for sure, and to a certain degree Slutty Lena can feed off Seymour's self disillusions of modern medici, make a buck and exit before really needing to gave up anything that they are not willing to, but posh Lena w/ low wits and sub Lena are easy prey. Which are (high wits and high lust) the more interesting ways a playthrough can go for the characterThis is simply not true. Lena can be a shrewd businesswoman in this pairing, fulfilling the contract and reaping the benefits, but without any illusions about Seymour's nature and without ever letting him touch her. She's walking a tight rope and she knows it, but it's interesting to see where it goes. I don't think there's anything vapid about her actions if you opt for this variant.
It's true for how I phrased it, "IF" you let her give in. Sure if you don't you can keep him at bay, but she can also be a super slut, in love with Ian and if you let her give in, she swaps to vapid gold digging bitch, the extreme.This is simply not true. Lena can be a shrewd businesswoman in this pairing, fulfilling the contract and reaping the benefits, but without any illusions about Seymour's nature and without ever letting him touch her. She's walking a tight rope and she knows it, but it's interesting to see where it goes. I don't think there's anything vapid about her actions if you opt for this variant.
There is definitely a double standard at work here. Male players who like harem games find nothing interesting when they play Lena, but are fine if Ian hits everything over and over, including Lena. Romance players can choose who they like and complain about everyone else. Slut lovers don't like Ian's side too much, but still find things to complain about.I read the latest review and the guy said MMC is more interesting and FMC is much worse. I fundamentally disagree with this. Ian spends the entire game screwing everything that moves, writing books and going to the gym. There are no cool plot twists. You don't care about him because his parents support him. Lena, on the other hand, supports her parents on her own. She has problems with rent, works two or three jobs, and has to make sacrifices to survive, dating assholes like Robert or even worse like Seymour.
Sorry, didn't mean to kinkshame you. I'm assuming your kink is being a dumbass.Opinions? Sorry but these are facts.
When you find Emma spreading her legs in the toilet of the fortress, she's actually just working and selling that booty to the lowest bidder.
I'm not even gonna bother talking bout Ivy and her wide ass peripheral vision, you know that thing is closer to a reptile than an actual human. Any of you who are into 'her' are prolly into zoo shit.
Louise's spirit animal is a damn mosquito.
As for Holly, she's as memorable as a table cloth.
The thing is "giving in" can mean two things here -- giving in and working with Seymour instead of rejecting his offer, or giving in to his sexual advances. You didn't really specify which of those you meant. I'll presume you meant the latter, while i was pointing out there's variations to the former.It's true for how I phrased it, "IF" you let her give in. Sure if you don't you can keep him at bay, but she can also be a super slut, in love with Ian and if you let her give in, she swaps to vapid gold digging bitch, the extreme.
I think it was clear, giving in to working with him isn't very extreme, especially early on. Of course I was referring to the sex. Don't leave out the monologue about how Seymour can give her everything she needs, when up to that point she was wary in most of her thoughts, so an extreme change.The thing is "giving in" can mean two things here -- giving in and working with Seymour instead of rejecting his offer, or giving in to his sexual advances. You didn't really specify which of those you meant.
Also as far as i can tell even in the case of giving in sexually if in close relationship isn't really automagically turning Lena into some "vapid gold digger"; at the very least she monologues about cheating on Ian and potentially Holly, and tries to figure out how she should proceed.