Link a single comment of Suna's where he wants his "precious queen appreciated". Or shut the fuck up. ""
If someone opts to tell others their negative comments about a character are "bitching and crying" they're getting back the same shit they dish out. If you don't like it buttercup, perhaps ask them to act more civil to begin with. Btw, it's funny how hot that got you under the collar. Struck too close to home, perhaps..?
Consensual BDSM is largely codified, to the point where it's only a semblance of actual dynamics. But yes, at its core sadism is powered by intent to hurt/harm a person. That's what the sadist gets off on. Why do you think consensual BDSM has the safewords? It's so the sub/m can protect themselves from harm if they feel the sadist is going too far for their own desire to feel hurt to handle.By your flexible-context use of words, a consensual night of BDSM between a sadistic dom and sub would be harmful and full of malice. Nobody but disingenuous clowns would use technical definitions like that there. For any "false equivalence" bullshit: the Carnations' participation is consensual.
Speaking of disingenuous clowns, the "consent" of the Carnations is largely a stretch, given why they have agreed to participate in the first place. Sure, they can in theory quit at any point. Except this means they'd giving up on the very thing that made them consent. And the longer they let things continue, the more strongly sunk cost fallacy kicks in for them as well.
And what else do you think she came back out with, other than the movie? Also remind me, how many participants are in each exhibition? What did those others come back out with? Other than having their ordeals recorded for old wankers' pleasure?One of the previous carnations is an actress and came back out with a movie, which is "ostensibly" what she wanted out of her exhibition. Maybe google "destroying", unless you're going the flexible-context route for every word you use.
It's pretty funny you'd pick this picture to try to make your point. Do you notice something about the other contestant, the one on the left? She sure looks like she's glowing and really, really happy to be there, doesn't she? Thanks, Kat.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
That "destruction" quote you tried so hard to be ironic about may be actually closer to truth than you ever accepted as possibility.
It all happens with Kat's knowledge as well. For all the lip service about "velvet gloves" she sure doesn't seem to mind the girls handled through other means. In fact, in her own words and with your own quote:Everything happens with August/Chuck's knowledge. August's share, and thus influence/responsibility in the club is presumably greater than Kathy's.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
I'm afraid you were so busy digging up all those screenshots, you have missed the forest for the trees. My point was that Kat's actions extend far from just handing whores at the brothel. She is explicitly luring in and abusing people who weren't seeking to work in this profession, and she is doing it simply because she gets a sexual kick out of harming them. She even tells Edwin this much. So yes, if you choose to shut your eyes on that and pretend that Kat is only "treating whores like whores" that's nothing but willful self-delusion.A whore willfully doing a donkey show in Mexico or some extreme fetish content has different metrics than a vanilla street hooker. Within the context of the exhibition's scope, which is "ostensibly" an allure for its members, Kathy's treating whores like whores. You're "willfully deluding yourself" if you think otherwise, or are fucking around with semantics.
Last edited: