Patreon is based in San Francisco. Patreon isn’t doing this in a vacuum; it has worked with pay systems (PayPal, credit car companies, etc to my understanding since 2016) to not have higher transaction fees attached to Adult content patron payments. Apparently, adult content online purchases have notoriously required higher transaction fees by pay services out of fraud issues (in my understanding).Patreon is an American company. In general America tends to have more permissive free speech laws than other western countries, to be honest. In much of Europe open race supremacist speech is blanket banned while absolutely legal in America. Obscenity is indeed the legal construct used to prosecute most illicit content. Mostly the government only seems to go after simulated **********, the most notable example of this being their prosecution of Max Hardcore. A few years before that a guy named Mike Diana was prosecuted on a local level for some pretty gross zines/minicomics. IIRC his "Boiled Angel" had some sexual violence peppered in too, though I've never managed to get my hands on a copy.
Basically, in America a work can be obscene if it depicts sexual activity in a prurient and offensive manner and it's devoid of artistic, literary, scientific or political value. Technically this is all balanced on whether a community would find it offensive, but that's kind out the window in the internet age. Basically that means artistic works where the sole focus is on providing sexual gratification can be regulated.
In general prosecutions are rare nowadays. Things like "Howl" by Allen Ginsburg or "Naked Lunch" by William S. Burroughs were the target of a ton of lawsuits in the 50's and 60's. They're largely the reason we have even semi-firm rules on what qualifies as legally obscene.
The thing is Patreon can pick and choose what they want to publish on their platform. This has nothing to do with obscenity. They are exercising their right to free speech by restricting what content can be available on their platform. There's a few reasons they would want to do this; optics, PR, legitimacy or they I guess they could fear running afoul of obscenity (probably not).
The real problem is the ecosystem and community of adult games has grown out and around Patreon. I'd rather somebody else step up and create a new ecosystem for adult games but even if it materializes it would face systemic problems. The inertia surrounding Patreon is huge but at least it doesn't keep the same kind of contractual stranglehold Amazon holds on it's Kindle author's throats. Thus far there haven't been any serious competitors to Patreon but we'll see.
Well, in fact it's not this surprising... Just found this :Lewdlabs (You must be registered to see the links) Patreon Post.
[...]
They said the problem is the fetishization of incest. So that instantly kills this discussion about adult games. (step relations are out of the question too)
You are kidding, right ? Please, say that you are kidding...[...][D. J. T.] has been involved in over 4000+ lawsuits in over 3 decades. 1 person, 4000+ lawsuits.
Having enough misadventures with the law but also having the money to not go to jail, just see Hollywood, most cases can't even be prosecuted because of statute of limitation, we can only hope that the backlash is enough to take them into obscurity.It's completely out of topic but...
[note: voluntary reduced the name, please don't answer with politic it's not my intent and I'm sure that the moderators will not like it.]
You are kidding, right ? Please, say that you are kidding...
According to wikipedia he's born the 14 June 1946, so he already lived 26 079 days (don't count leap years, too lazy). This mean an average of at least 1 lawsuit each 6.5 days since his birth ! More that one a week ! :hushedface: How someone can achieve this without working for the judicial system ? Is there even a single person working for the judicial system with such an average ?
And you said, "over 3 decades", so it's in fact more than twice this.:OhMyGoodness:
If you're thinking of doing it via Patreon, step- whatever will not fly. They will strike down just as hard. Of course, they will need to find it first, but it might happen. I would suggest something along the lines I'm creating, where you can swap out "mother" / "sister" / "my mother" / "your sister" etc. with names (hence removing any connotations to family at all) - it takes a bit of fine-tuning for the text to work like that, and you will need a lot more variables for names and pronouns, but it's completely doable.Reading through a lot of this is a bit concerning. I am in the early stages of planning an development of my first game and I am not looking to approach it half-assed. I am really wondering how close to the sun should I fly while keeping my idea of a game intact. One compromise I have already thought of was to introduce the MC as an adopted family member to avoid an immediate incest red flag.
I really want to come up with and put out a quality product that I am happy with but want to make sure I will not have to completely change what I had planned from the get go just to avoid potential issues going forward.
This was the first response a month ago. A lot of creators launched their own site/blog to host the content and depict the game more in depth than they were now allowed on their Patreon page.I don’t know anything about patreon but can’t you guys just use it as a means to get paid but create your own website for the downloads? Have no link to the website on the patreon page so it won’t get into trouble. Probably won’t be that easy but could work?
So only way if they wanted to continue the same way is to get paid from there own individual sites?This was the first response a month ago. A lot of creators launched their own site/blog to host the content and depict the game more in depth than they were now allowed on their Patreon page.
Then, patreon stated that creators couldn't link to something containing the banned words/content. And by this they meant something like, "whatever if the page linked don't have banned content, it's not permit as long as the said banned content is somewhere on the site you link to". But well, creators, as well as the community, were hoping that they'll not start to look deep into the site.
And now their new move is to, implicitly, say that whatever the content is available directly or indirectly from the Patreon page, you can't use Patreon to fund it. And here creators are fucked. There's no way to deal with this without changing the game itself.
Until a reliable alternative come in the market, yes. It will not a be big deal for already established creators, since they have a big fans and donators base. They will probably earn less, but still achieve to raise money. The biggest part of the problem will be for creators who don't have a big visibility and obviously creators who want to enter the market with their games. They both don't have a fan base yet and so will encounter real difficulties to raise some money.So only way if they wanted to continue the same way is to get paid from there own individual sites?