That doesn't clear him from guilt and Brenna already has trust issues.
I'm literally sitting with the game open and replaying every scene so I don't say something incorrect. That's why it's taken me over an hour to reply even though I saw this comment when it was first only a few mins old. The problem is not me misremebering events. Like I said I'm lierally replaying the game while typing. Its that I don't believe in A your reasoning for a lot of things. Or B tht a lot of the events are connected. The Clerk thing is very clearly mre about Elieen and doesn't have anything to do with the two incident. Same with her depression. This is clearly mostly about Elieen and not about Brenna thinking she's crazy. Which is what's also actually feeding into her paranoia. She has pre existing trust issues that Elieen is bringng back up while also being wierded out by the thing with Ophelia.
Cathrine literally iniated both of those with her lack of boundaries. Not sterling. Cathrine repeatedly pushes her boundaries and even in the first chapter decided she was going to kiss sterling, then later decides she was just going to give sterling a blow job
Because like I said the event with the tooth is not brought up again and Brenna's main issue is established to be her trust issues which is what feed into her paranoia
Brenna saying how would they check is not proof that she believes Stering. It's asking Sterling to provide proof of his accusation
I've literally been replaying the game as I've talked to you. Connecting everything wrong with Brenna to the tooth incident is nonsense.
Again he doesn't know she's paranoid in the first place. He just knows she's about to accuse him again. Most of the events you're talking about Sterling wasn't around for.
The fact that they literally don't believe him when he accuses Hunter. And the fact that Hunter successfully flips the accusations
The game establishes it in literally the fisrt chapter that nobody will believe Sterling. That Sterling decides he needs to gather proof and expose hunter at once and that Hunter is spying on the and will make it look like Sterling did it which is literally exactly what happen. The bigger queston I have is why you are convinced at all that Sterling ene could tell the truth.
He tried to use it AND Hunter's fake eyeball, and Hunter's drugs, and the Robot suit. He doesnt present one evidence and say that's good enough he gathers multiple evidence so he actually has a case incase it falls through. Even with the proof Hunter had everyone convinced until Lucia showed up with the gas canisters.
I don't think it was messed up at all or do I think that it's connected to Brenna's behavior when the problem is very clearly Elieen. I do not think sterling was ever in the wrong for this and I think you are reading way to much into it by trying to connect these events. Sterling established a reason why he doesn't come forward. And even if you don't believe Sterling's reasoning the important thing is that he believes in that reasoning. Sterling believes that telling Brenna the truth will do more harm than good so he decides to wait until later. I don't know why you are connecting the events to her parania though
Except it's not good evvidence. She literally points out right away that Hunter has all his teeth. They make fake teeth to be just like real teeth and there isn't a good way to prove Hunter got a fake tooth.
It's literally what happens in the story. I replayed the scene the past 4 times.
I was unsure what part ofthe game you were talking about. Regardless my argument with Lucia is the exact same. Lucia already knows Hunter is drugging everyone. Lucia is already established to be smarter than Sterling, Sterling is also getting drugged. This is not Sterling taking advantage of Lucia. This is literally just Lucia not caring and Sterling being to dumb to kow what's going on. Lucia literally has the capability to stop sterling at any time and chooses not to while also assaulting people
It's not based off a misunderstanding at all. You're aking leaps in logic that I fundamentally disagree with. The Brenna tooth thing being the biggest thing I disagree with to the point where I literally don't understand how you,
Fayn Arawn or anyone else could arrived at the conclusion instead of the more obvious explanations the game literally gives us. You're reading way to into things and connecting eents that aren' actually connected or have anything to do with each other.
It's one thing to say that Sterling arriving at the conclusion that he has to lie is not very reasonable. It another thing to argue that he was morally wrong for doing so when he very clearly things telling the truth will cause her harm. I said it earlier and I aid it again. I think your entire argument is ridiclous and would be better if you redirect it at the plot for not being convincing enough.
No I don't agree that Sterling did anything wrong at all in regards to Brenna or Lucia and while he took advantage of Catherine's naivity in some parts she's still the one who initiates everything. He just chooses not to shut her down.