I wasn't in the meeting but I would assume patreon made a wide ruling because that's the easier path. Had it affected their bottom line like with OnlyFans, I assume things would have went differently. BTW, OnlyFans gets away with mother-son / brother-sister roleplay, don't they?
The thing you have to remember is companies like Patreon are located in California and are surrounded by their laws and propaganda. Just because one state says it's fine doesn't mean California or New York say it is, therefore it has to go if you want to use the site. Silly, but that's how it goes.
That too to a degree. Although, Onlyfans tried that and almost lost it all.
They get away with it because they have way too much income for both them and the processors to risk tossing it all away. Porn is their only real source of income and banning it would have destroyed the site.
If you had the money to outlast them, you probably could. Poor folk aren't able to sue those big companies though.I think you should be able to add a disclaimer, 'All models are 18 or over. All models are fictional characters in a fictional world and no actual incest occurred.' Then, in a perfect world, you can take them to court for violating your rights to free speech or some shit like that.
Free speech only applies to the government can't take action on your speech (with exceptions - no threats or false advertising, for example.) It doesn't mean you can say what you want on someone else's platform, just like you can't tell your boss to fuck off and expect to still have a job.I think you should be able to add a disclaimer, 'All models are 18 or over. All models are fictional characters in a fictional world and no actual incest occurred.' Then, in a perfect world, you can take them to court for violating your rights to free speech or some shit like that.
Nope. Incest is defined as having a close blood relation, even in USA (I assume, maybe wrongly, you are from there).
That's not what OF tried.
Well, with COVID, there has been a lot more mainstream business, and even school, or family Internet traffic, for things like streaming and videoconferencing, but at least till pre-COVID (don't know after), porn-related was still the biggest traffic on the Internet.That's not what OF tried.
They tried to drop the porn association and become more mainstream, in a similar vein to Youtube. It really didn't work.
In UK Step relations would still be regarded as incest from a legal stand point. = criminal offense dude.
Are you sure it is legally defined as "incest", and not as a crime because the person is the legal guardian over the minor (and is a minor) or something similar ?
Oh yes it is. I know one guy close to me that got his step sister pregnant. He is now on the sex offenders register for the rest of hs life despite the girl in question consenting and both being of legal ages. He wasn't jailed because he still had to work to hand over child support for kiddie.
It is classified as incest for the purposes of a criminal act, which depending on circumstances allows for other similar charges to be applied separately.
The issue was how much they were starting to lose (too much, too quickly), before they were ever going to see any return on their change of image/allowed content. They were scared they were about to go under before they could even stabilise prior to becoming a mainstream platform.
The issue with your example is it is defeated when you cross state lines. I already explained that different states have different rules, and different judges make it worse. Sure, you could appeal, but it doesn't mean that a judge won't rule differently. Of course patreon is the final say in it and it is probably due to their state and card companies.
Yup the Brit Royals are notoriously incestuous. Eugenic practices are not uncommon amongst them.It is classified as incest for the purposes of a criminal act, which depending on circumstances allows for other similar charges to be applied separately.
Which is incredibly ironic given the genealogical history of the monarchy
The issue was how much they were starting to lose (too much, too quickly), before they were ever going to see any return on their change of image/allowed content. They were scared they were about to go under before they could even stabilise prior to becoming a mainstream platform.
You guys are still looking for more German royal blood?
Well, about the different rules, I undestand what you mean, you can check the my post when I checked the age of consent in USA.
).
...??? hang on; so you're telling me, that if a legal-aged guy was fucking a legal-aged girl, n they're unrelated by blood, n both have separate sets of divorced parents, if 1 of their parents winds up marrying 1 of the other's parents, their relationship goes from being legal to illegal, under the definition of the laws in the UK??!! that is just TOTALLY FUBAR...
reminded me of the movie "Transformers: Age of Extinction":Well, about the different rules, I undestand what you mean, you can check the my post when I checked the age of consent in USA.
In short, men, you have a mess, and if you know two young persons who want to have any kind of sexual activity, I would stronly advise they check with a specialised lawyer ! :-D
You even states that prohibit anything below 18 even if consensual and both below 18; states that have an age of consent, but then allow someone below the age of consent to consent if the partner is less than two or less than three years older, to the point that would accept consent from 13 year old if the partner is 14 or (not yet, if I recall well) 15; one in which one can have sex with someone below age of consent, if they are legally married (and how do you marry in a legally valid way if they are below the age to consent to marriage ?)...
But still, I doubt they will use so freely the "incest" label, the same way in which in USA they do not want to use the "statutory rape" label, although they apply widely in practice (and with the mess both you and I already referred to
The UK law is a bit outdated. The point of the law is this passage:
You can marry your step-mother if you are 21 or older and never lived with her under the same roof. In other cases you are not allowed to marry her.
OK, that makes more sense, also legally, in light of the reference I found. It is not a matter of being legally defined as, but rather, considered and punished as if.
Oh, it is not only the UK one. Someone already joked about the "German blood", remember the tragedy for Queen Victoria was that she had tried to place all members in the family in the thrones around Europe, and pretty much succeeded, but then, WWI was basically a war between cousins.Which is incredibly ironic given the genealogical history of the monarchy
No, much worstdammit...didn't realize i signed up for an interpretive law class online; i just wanna get back to fapping, n empty my nutz
, you signed up for a class covering and mixing international comparative law, national marriage law, divorce law, criminal law (in most countries classified as the part that goes under "sexual crimes" or "crimes against the person", but in some maybe still referred as "crimes against morality", etc.), plus, because we are including USA, also state law and its interaction with the federal one for the same country ., and only reinforces the "bottom line". (the patches, one already promised, and one more or less also).
