Bicba
New Member
- May 19, 2017
- 12
- 44
- 163
Jimmeh
Member
- Jun 20, 2017
- 219
- 566
- 258
478mb!!! ha ha, very funny.
I don't really know much about compression but
You must be registered to see the links
is a 132mbYeah sorry I should learn how to read. It means a year ago we could have had a cinematic mode (in the gallery) with free camera movement but we are still here with more or less nothing new... well let's hope there is still something interesting in may (yeah i'm quite new so I still have some hope even regarding the MATM situation)
magfonte
Newbie
- Dec 14, 2017
- 58
- 36
- 242
so this is developed since 2018. just correct me if im wrong. you can pay for these since them. The "game" has content like 6 month of developing as a one man with just one arm.
In terms of what was devd in near 3 years and what need to do, this will be finish like 2028. Does anyone belive that we ever see a version 1.0?
In terms of what was devd in near 3 years and what need to do, this will be finish like 2028. Does anyone belive that we ever see a version 1.0?
Syybeat
Active Member
- Feb 27, 2018
- 500
- 744
- 277
orrayt3x
Active Member
- May 23, 2017
- 562
- 2,419
- 474
Syybeat
Active Member
- Feb 27, 2018
- 500
- 744
- 277
Automated settings perhaps?
You do realize a 6800 is a unicorn to get in this destroyed GPU market, and a relatively powerful card, right? 75 fps on a 6800 in this game at 3440x1440 is horrible unless you've capped it. Unless automated settings you can't access are being cranked up based on auto detection, something is seriously wrong. And it has a crap ton of post effects on that I really dislike anyway, but no option to disable them.
I highly doubt it will happen.
what did you expect? that makes sense since patreon also profits from abandoned accounts that still milk its donors
I mean its sad, but people should really be more responsible with their spendings...
I think you can paste the text into a notepad file and name it Persistent.save
Totally agree and also a contributing factor is the amount of bots that genuinely give this "creator" more than 3 stars.what did you expect? that makes sense since patreon also profits from abandoned accounts that still milk its donors
I mean its sad, but people should really be more responsible with their spendings...
I've also given a lot of stars to a starting project but not to something that is not even half done for almost 3 years and not even mentioning that it was supposed to be a "quick project". If you extrapolate this a life time will not be enough to see the light of dawn on the "other project"