- Dec 2, 2021
- 489
- 1,025
His game was 100% banned for Rule 7.
He got the game banned from F95 before for the exact same reason so.
- Thread starter 7767
- Start date
He got the game banned from F95 before for the exact same reason so.
- Dec 2, 2021
- 489
- 1,025
Partly yes his DLCs very much did break Rule 7 and he did ask people to not link it on F95 several times cause he knew he would get banned for it.
So he never shared it personally.
He had Rule 7 content present in the game before but promptly removed those characters and altered his main characters and got the game back on F95 after he was banned the first time.
Later on he would share the removed characters as an extra patch with the rule that it would not be shared on F95 and same with the first DLC he dropped which should have never been shared on F95 but people still did.
He just went on to claim it was rogue mods on F95 adding the files to the game and then sharing it to make him look bad.
As much as he claims to not like F95 it is quite funny how desperate he is to keep his games on here cause he knows they would have zero reach otherwise.
- Dec 4, 2017
- 3,917
- 10,179
Ok i wouldn't know about that game, i think it's 3-4 years or so since i last played it, not really good or interesting story imo. Thought, i wonder it got banned now, that game had very young looking LI's from the start.Most of the complaints of Alorth is through his other game that just got banned on F95 some hour ago.
He would actively use the same tactics this game and SirD has been known for using.
He has been caught lying more times than not in the thread of his other game.
- May 14, 2021
- 1,001
- 2,411
- Dec 2, 2021
- 489
- 1,025
In the post just above yours I explained it a bit more in-depth but short version is he got banned for Rule 7 once before -> Removed all the Rule 7 characters and changed his main characters to look older -> Got unbanned -> Slowly reintroduced the Rule 7 character as DLC/Patches -> Banned again.
Last edited:
- Dec 4, 2017
- 3,917
- 10,179
Hm, i thought content through a patch is ok, wasn't there other games which did it so...don't remember the games but i think the dev was neko-hime
- Mar 25, 2021
- 11,271
- 24,876
- May 14, 2021
- 1,001
- 2,411
Alorth is the dev for Neko Paradise, Neko-Hime is the dev for Mao sama& a few others.
- Dec 4, 2017
- 3,917
- 10,179
Yes, and i'm pretty sure the games of neko-hime have also content which isn't allowed per rule 7, but it's done with a patch which was ok.Alorth is the dev for Neko Paradise, Neko-Hime is the dev for Mao sama& a few others.
- Dec 2, 2021
- 489
- 1,025
I think the patches are gray-zone?
People would openly link the entire pack of the old Rule 7 characters and I think he was warned about that.
I think what got him banned are the DLCs themselves since they get leaked and shared as the entire content itself and not as a patch that would activate said content instead.
I think I saw people sharing the links and openly talking about it in the thread which I believe Alorth had asked not to happen
If update won't be realised before 2025, you can officially say there isn't a single fuck SirD gives about this project.