- May 9, 2019
- 4,889
- 16,247
I think if anything you can think about it like this. You can kill a cow to eat it, you can kill a cow to use it as blanket, hey you can even kill a cow to steal their place of living for you. Simply killing a cow for pleasure is not a nice thing to do.Ah so it's selective.
Let's say Archon asks her to get some info about a rival clan or whatever. She finds a human contact and mind fucks him to get the info. While knowing this could get him in serious trouble, even in danger for his life. I'd say considering everything we know about this setting, this is not too far fetched of a scenario right? Should that act stain or not? It has to in my books.
Like the great philosopher Geralt of Rivia said, "evil is evil".
According to your scenario, morality involved is complex. If by doing so she only gets more power, what she is doing is kind of evil. If by refusing doing so, she will get killed, in the end she is just doing what she has to survive.
Sorry, I disagree with Geralt, here. I don't think you can simply categorize each event as good or evil, as even the same event can change according to perspective. MC gained absolutely nothing from this act of raping her beyond the act itself. There was neither danger, neither gain, no ultimate motive. So the fact that he would do something reprehensible just for the fact of doing it could be the thing that generated the soulstain.
In the end, we all do potentially evil acts, all the time. It is how we justify doing them what defines them as evil or not.
Last edited: