There's definitely a lot of merit to generating with AI, but polishing it up to a good standard takes a long time, and a good GPU.
I wonder what it would take for the AI to create the layers for you. I could see it being difficult to request specific areas, but technically possible.
I'm just not that impressed with the generative artwork stuff overall. I've spent a bit of time messing around with SD and was underwhelmed by the results I got. I'm sure if I gave it more time it could have improved some, but it was so far off the mark that I don't think it would ever get to the quality I'd want.
I think something like separate layers is well beyond the realm of possibility. And (to me at least) even getting art that is on model (matching Ferdafs style) is a 1 in a billion roll of the cosmic dice, let alone in a pose I might want. And if I want to animate stuff, well, it's a re-draw from scratch anyhow.
Could've not said it better myself.
The entire concept is still barely out of its infancy, especially with certain parts of natural language interpretation, plus adequate GPU availability vs. internet access is another significant limitation. It's currently more like the blockchain concept was a few years ago, impressive in limited applications but goddamit, we're gonna cram it into everything before its time anyways! Still, hard to argue with the sophistication curve, regardless of whether it's convolutional, recurrent, or whatever combined monster has supplanted them. But after reading some of the absurd prompts necessary to get at least the convolutional versions (ie, stable diffusion) to output EXACTLY what you want, probably better to wait for something that better utilizes natural language. Like seriously, unless it's at least algebra, you shouldn't need to (put(stuff(in(nested(parenthesis))))).
Yep, if I could give the characters voices, Morticia would sound like Mabel. That's the voice I hear when writing or reading lines for her at least (and Mabel has inspired many of her character traits I've added)
And now I can't unhear it.
While running game code:
File "game/scripts/story/day_0037.rpy", line 2308, in script
s "I'm only [summer_age]! I don't want to be like my mom and have a kid before I've even graduated high school!"
KeyError: 'summer_age'Fixed! Thanks for the find!
That's the goal, on track for it.
This question has been answered multiple times but if you're too damn lazy to search for it then I'm too lazy to give you the answer.
i'm not today so let me take care of that brother
yes, this version will continue with the aim to give it an actual ending as soon as possible. if the main game come back things might continue as usual but without scrapping the work he did (at least not entirely) just in case. i believe that's good enough a resume
heh. imagine if a way home get updated the moment the version of another way home with its ending gets released
now i would consider that a conspiracy worthy kinda dick move haha, break the spirit of the guy to ensure that the money "lost" goes right back to you. who knows, i guess it's a possibility along with it just being a coincidence, personally i very much lean on the shadow quitting theory, that's what makes the most sense to me
Will do my best, hopefully players will like it.
I mean, I'd prefer the game to keep going over coming to an end, so if I have to rollback or put the ending on hold to get more content, that is my preferred outcome. I don't think that will be the case, but I can always hope.
