- Aug 13, 2019
- 503
- 992
Nah i will just sacrifice a goat during the next fullmoon and we should be good.
- Thread starter 7767
- Start date
- Jan 21, 2021
- 1,299
- 2,479
Why are people so cringe, who wants to know about either of you guys delusions.
- Jul 5, 2021
- 3,686
- 6,679
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
- Jan 24, 2019
- 85
- 124
I was just passing by because I wanted to see if there were any posts about the status of the updates and to catch up and whatnot with stuff related to this game.
I DID NOT expect to see an entire thesis about whatever fetishes yall were talking about. That post nut clarity must be hitting hard in the down time.
I DID NOT expect to see an entire thesis about whatever fetishes yall were talking about. That post nut clarity must be hitting hard in the down time.
- Jun 20, 2022
- 6,282
- 10,463
- May 20, 2021
- 745
- 2,713
Lemme try:
Okay, hypothetically assuming tha Mystery Man is both MC's dad and the future MC, if MC watches his dad/future self seduce and fuck one of MC's girls is it:
A) Netori
B) Netorare
C) Netorase
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Additional info: Also assume the seduced love interest has only relatively recently become involved with MC (in his youthful state). Please answer for the following two cases: i) The seduced LI is aware that Mystery Man is the aged version of MC; and ii) the seduced LI is unaware that Mystery Man is the aged version of MC.
Last edited:
- Aug 13, 2019
- 503
- 992
Personally i doubt MC and his dad are the same, i doubt we're going to see the old Grandfather paradox in here.
- May 20, 2021
- 745
- 2,713
Truth be told, I put odds at 3:2, maybe 2:1, myself. But, to avoid having to argue that part of the question, I included the words "hypothetically assuming".
- Apr 24, 2020
- 6,706
- 10,972
Who is Andrew Tate?
EDIT: Oh, the guy who had a Twitter fight with Greta Thunberg. You're right, some of those arguments are presented by Red Pill guys.
Last edited:
- Jan 21, 2021
- 1,299
- 2,479
- Mar 29, 2020
- 778
- 1,294
I would've agreed if not for unnecessary descriptive story about how mc's mom meet his dead somewhere at the beginning of the game. That scene along with the name of the game is what actually lead me to think it's a time travel story in the first place (didn't pay attention to synapsis or tags at the time).
I also tried, but not with patience to do rhymes again.
Since I did with boobies, maybe some could do with asses.
So going along your theory, you're telling me the MC is cucking himself? That's a new whole level of dedication.
- Apr 24, 2020
- 6,706
- 10,972
Met his dead what?
I read The Man Who Folded Himself by David Gerrold back in high school.
The Man Who Cucked Himself would be a very new take on the genre.
- Mar 29, 2020
- 778
- 1,294
Oh boi, the things I would do to Shelby! (The mean girl, not him: View attachment 2500751 )
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
- Mar 15, 2020
- 301
- 488
The majority of men have not reproduced throughout human history, this is not unusual for people to be left out of the gene pool. You're acting like one single man mates with an entire society - no, half of the population's next generation will not be 50% identical. A tiny fraction of it will be because there is more than one man in a specific society able to provide for a child. The priority is always the survival of the offspring first and foremost.
But those cultures are not the norm, nor the majority. People have always worked together in societies to raise children, it doesn't mean they share resources or sperm. You just said above, agreed upon by reputable anthropologists, historians, and evolutionary psychologists, that the majority of civilisations throughout human history prior to 1,000 years ago were polygynous polygamies. So why are you now arguing that my polygonous situation is a relatively recent development?
No, it means that humans are biologically rewarded for certain behaviours for the purpose of an evolutionary advantage to the point where it becomes natural instinct. We are biologically wired to pursue sex, for example. Or to pursue fertile women for reproduction. Or to fear death or social exclusion. Our sexual attractions are biologically wried based on what was evolutionarily advantageous for us as a species.
The tabula rasa theory is long since disproven and ridiculous pseudo-science. The majority of human behaviour is driven by genetic influences and biological urges, not by societal enforcement.
No, I haven't, and it shows how much you have been paying attention. Polyamory (promiscuity) is unnatural, and it was not the norm in human history. Sexual exclusivity in both monogamy and polygamy is natural due to being evolutionary advantageous as I explained previously.
Both men and women are turned off by promiscuity. Requiring that I clarify a general statement like this with "some" is just uncharitable ridiculousness. If I say that dogs enjoy going on walks, it is just outright dishonest to hold it against me as all dogs enjoy going on walks in an attempt to counter my argument with "but not all!".
From my perspective, you can't follow the conversation and keep misunderstanding my position. I very clearly explained why my positions are evolutionarily advantageous and would have been practised behaviour throughout human history - it has nothing to do with current cultural practices. I haven't seen any research or publications from you - are hyperlinks or attachments not working for me or something? It's not like peer-reviewed means anything in science these days anyway.
I was referring to this post by yourself, where you claim to have vague understandings and guesses on a surface level.
Last edited: