crustlord12
Well-Known Member
- Jun 24, 2020
- 1,033
- 4,004
- 427
Personally, I think it's Skylar.Crazy conversation here, guys.
So who has the best tits in the game?
Personally, I think it's Skylar.Crazy conversation here, guys.
So who has the best tits in the game?
I usually prefer them at the smaller side but....Crazy conversation here, guys.
So who has the best tits in the game?
She's my favorite, so far. I like them all, but there's just something about her.Personally, I think it's Skylar.
Honestly, her mom (past version, at least) is probably one of the only characters in this game that could dethrone her in my opinionShe's my favorite, so far. I like them all, but there's just something about her.
It's not about polygamy or monogamy, but about polyamory. The majority of civilisations in human history have been polygamous, whereby one man will often have multiple wives, but they haven't been polyamorous.I know many earlier biologists assumed that many birds were monogamous, then it was found that their offsprings' DNA did not match the male bird they were "pair bonding" with. If you want to take some of our closer simian relatives, the Bonobos are definitely not monogamous. One thing that does seem to shine through is that when males are in charge of a community, they seem to care for such things, but in matriarchal and those where no one gender dominates, monogamy is often the exception. There has been much to suggest that female monogamy wasn't not imposed upon human societies until after the acquisition of power that comes with agrarian society.
Before birth control, it was an incredibly risky game to engage in promiscuity. Human babies are very needy, and one person trying to accomplish that task on their own is going to be hobbled by the sheer difficulty of raising a dependant for a decade, whilst also gathering food and protection for themselves. Therefore, men have traditionally succeeded reproductively by investing in their offspring and in the mothers of their offspring, to further guarantee that their offspring will survive and proliferate their genetic line.Pair bonding in raising offspring may have it's evolutionary advantage, but so is seeking genetic diversity. Having offspring with genetic diversity means that one's descendants are likely to be more adaptable to changing conditions.
Not sure there is a lot of "relationship" occurring with casual sex. I don't know how much cheaper cheap sex can really get.Body count.
BODY COUNT?
That telegraphs so much.
That term reduces human relationships to one single activity and cheapens even that, IMHO.
All of them have their beauty and duties,Personally, I think it's Skylar.
You appear to be contrasting polygyny (multiple women) and polyandry (multiple men). Either one can be part of a polygamous breakfast (many marriages). Polyamory is a relationship strategy that purposefully does not address marriage status, one way or another.It's not about polygamy or monogamy, but about polyamory. The majority of civilisations in human history have been polygamous, whereby one man will often have multiple wives, but they haven't been polyamorous.
Do you mean before modern birth control methods? Women have had birth control methods for millennia. Some of them are actually mentioned and recommended in the Bible.Before birth control, it was an incredibly risky game to engage in promiscuity. Human babies are very needy, and one person trying to accomplish that task on their own is going to be hobbled by the sheer difficulty of raising a dependant for a decade, whilst also gathering food and protection for themselves. Therefore, men have traditionally succeeded reproductively by investing in their offspring and in the mothers of their offspring, to further guarantee that their offspring will survive and proliferate their genetic line.
All I can say is that if we were hardwired (rather than some of us being culturally raised) in this way, there would be a lot more infanticide of step children. Thankfully, this is not the norm in modern society.This is why men are hardwired to find sexual exclusivity appealing because they don't want to be stuck raising and investing in offspring that isn't theirs. That is a handicap for their evolutionary success.
Perhaps an evolutionary advantage to his own alleles, but individuals do not evolve, populations do. Having so many children share the same father is not advantageous in the long term.This is not contradictory to a polygamous society where a man will have multiple wives. If he is able to afford the resources to invest in multiple women and multiple offspring, then he will, whilst also requiring them to be sexually exclusive to him because it is to his evolutionary advantage.
I think you are confusing biological imperatives with cultural upbring. All things being equal, it is evolutionarily better for a species to have the greatest diversity of alleles. That way the population has the best chance of adaptation when conditions change. When a society imposes pseudoscientific principles, things can be very different.The opposite is true for women, however. Women have the biological downside of being forced to carry a baby to term for 9 months during which she is very vulnerable and requires extra protection. Being promiscuous for a woman was a game of baby roulette, so they would traditionally avoid casual sex like the plague. Men, meanwhile, if presented with an opportunity for casual sex, to produce offspring without investing resources, will have a difficult time resisting that opportunity because is an incredible evolutionary win. But casual sex as a means of reproduction will not have been common in human history because women are heavily incentivised to refuse casual sex.
It still seems like you're declaring your cultural biases as universal biological imperatives. Do you have any modern papers (i.e. not coming from white 19th century colonialists). You seem to be implying that all men and women are put off by promiscuity. All? With no exceptions? Perhaps you're running with the "No True Scotsman" fallacy, saying that those who don't adhere to your standard are somehow "unnatural" or "abominations." Implying that promiscuity is some aberration of nature denies the evidence and seeks to cast anything outside of one's direct experience as "unnatural." I grew up in the 1960s and 1970s, when many attitudes about what is or is not natural came to be challenged.This difference in male/female reproductive strategies is why men covet virgins, and women do not, and why both men and women are turned off by promiscuity.
- Women would traditionally require commitment and investment from a man before having sex with him, but if a man has enough resources to provide for multiple wives, she will still take that deal because it is to her evolutionary advantage. However, if a man has too many wives or too many offspring, then his resources may be stretched too thin.
- Men would traditionally require a woman to be sexually exclusive because it is to his evolutionary disadvantage to invest and spend resources on an offspring that does not help further his genetic line.
In FWB and polyamory, there are generally plenty of relationship connections being formed and fostered.Not sure there is a lot of "relationship" occurring with casual sex. I don't know how much cheaper cheap sex can really get.
So far, there's no-one you can't say no to.I Haven't played this game yet but reading some comments it sounds like there might be a harem later on my question is can you avoid that and just be with the one girl or will you be forced to be with multiple girls.
thought i would ask before playing as i am a one woman kind of guy both in real life and in visual novels.
I mean, you can, but why would you? Plus :So far, there's no-one you can't say no to.
I was just answering his question in my own special way ^_^I mean, you can, but why would you? Plus :
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Ahh okay i think i'll skip this then i hate forced sex scenes.So far, there's no-one you can't say no to.
Geez i'm stupid i just read that question wrongAhh okay i think i'll skip this then i hate forced sex scenes.
The reality is that there are many beautiful women you can spend time with but there is the ability to stop the vast majority of the relationships from getting romantic/sexual. Most of the people here (and I believe - all the Ripples supporters) are happy to be involved with multiple women (I'm good with almost all the women except Shelby - my MC thinks she deserves a good hate fuck - and certainly no romance).Geez i'm stupid i just read that question wrong![]()
A shit ton of work must have gone into this...All of them have their beauty and duties,
To please my eyes, don't make me choose...
Be it Skylar, her mom Luna or anyone they are my cuties,
The girls on this game have nothing to prove,
Jessica don't get jealous, I love yours too,
Tiffany has puppies that I want to screw,
Like peaches and plums, and melons too...
Are some of the fruits that most women grew,
Darci's so cute like a Barbi doll,
Her grandma also has it all,
Some are so large, and some are so small,
Some sag down low and some stand up tall,
Krystal's are quite firm and have little dark nipples
Daphne's are quite soft but don't have wrinkles and ripples,
Jenny of the past or future, I want my head in middle,
Why? The answer to that question should be simple,
Scarlet's are so big...to carry them must be rough,
Her readhead daughter's, Alyssa and Alice are cute opposites,
All are of them are so cute, I simply can't have enough,
To see, to feed, to grab, to fuck, all those have many benefits,
Many girls didn't show theirs, but I'm sure I'll love them,
Val, Khloe, Janelle and even MC's cousin, all gorgeous femmes,
Your cute, beautiful and gorgeous titties are my comfort,
Your sweet and round asses too, please give me an upskirt,
To the breasts we didn't see yet, like Darci's mom, where are you?
Lizzie and Dani, even if I want yours so much why I can't see you?
Why I can't see those charming and angelic milk-filled balloons,
Those adorable cuties hanging so proudly smelling the fresh air,
You may be extremely rude Shelby, everyday's morning to afternoon,
But don't be afraid my dear I still want you to please me with your pair,
One thing for sure, I can't deny that for most men it's a norm,
We all love to see those Ripples boobs... any size, shape or form!
A little bit, but I was bored, and while I like Skylar others deserve love too.A shit ton of work must have gone into this...
But you rhymed too with too. 2/10 try again
A shit ton of work must have gone into this...
But you rhymed too with too. 2/10 try again
easy fix. replace "melons too" with "honeydew"A little bit, but I was bored, and while I like Skylar others deserve love too.
Ye I noticed the 'too" afterwards but spent enough time already, and english isn't my native language anyway. I may be bored at that time but I still have life![]()
T be more specific, I mean polygyny. The majority of civilisations have been polygynous.You appear to be contrasting polygyny (multiple women) and polyandry (multiple men). Either one can be part of a polygamous breakfast (many marriages). Polyamory is a relationship strategy that purposefully does not address marriage status, one way or another.
Before reliable birth control.Do you mean before modern birth control methods? Women have had birth control methods for millennia. Some of them are actually mentioned and recommended in the Bible.
It's not difficult to ignore your biological imperatives. We do it all the time. It is a part of being in a civilised society. It's why I don't murder my neighbour when we have a dispute despite being really angry at him.All I can say is that if we were hardwired (rather than some of us being culturally raised) in this way, there would be a lot more infanticide of step children. Thankfully, this is not the norm in modern society.
It is more evolutionary advantageous to have your children provided for and protected, which is why multiple women often marry a single man with the resources to do so. You need your offspring to live, first and foremost. There is nothing about my argument that suggests that diversity isn't achieved - a man having multiple wives is diversifying his genetic line. Diversity is also achieved by multiple men and multiple women having their own sexually exclusive relationships. I am not sure what you're even trying to refute here.Perhaps an evolutionary advantage to his own alleles, but individuals do not evolve, populations do. Having so many children share the same father is not advantageous in the long term.
I think you are confusing biological imperatives with cultural upbring. All things being equal, it is evolutionarily better for a species to have the greatest diversity of alleles. That way the population has the best chance of adaptation when conditions change. When a society imposes pseudoscientific principles, things can be very different.
No. Where did I say all? Please don't be dishonest and argue in bad faith like this. Promiscuity is unnatural from an evolutionary biological perspective, as I explained previously. You grew up in the 60s and 70s, claim that the social acceptance towards promiscuity was challenged by society, and think I am the one with the cultural biases towards promiscuity? The fact that promiscuity only became prominent in the last 50 years of our civilisation shows that it is a cultural behaviour only and not a viable reproductive strategy.You seem to be implying that all men and women are put off by promiscuity. All? With no exceptions? Perhaps you're running with the "No True Scotsman" fallacy, saying that those who don't adhere to your standard are somehow "unnatural" or "abominations." Implying that promiscuity is some aberration of nature denies the evidence and seeks to cast anything outside of one's direct experience as "unnatural." I grew up in the 1960s and 1970s, when many attitudes about what is or is not natural came to be challenged.
Of course not. These games are meant to appeal to fantasy, which is why people want to experience polyamory or harems in the game, or experience taking a woman's virginity. If these games were realistic, they wouldn't be popular or sold.In any case, we're talking about AVNs. If those "traditional" rules for relationship styles were adhered to, I don't know how popular these stories would be.