- Apr 9, 2017
- 286
- 819
Yep i had the same problem ill update it asap
Edit:
A5643 Its been fixed, please redownload and try again
Last edited:
Edit:
A5643 Its been fixed, please redownload and try again
- Apr 9, 2017
- 286
- 819
- Apr 9, 2017
- 286
- 819
- Aug 12, 2017
- 707
- 1,917
Aziien I was "cleaning" one of my disks and I found a copy of your older versions 1.61 and 1.63 that were compatible with MV v1.3.x to v1.5.x.
- Apr 9, 2017
- 286
- 819
- Apr 9, 2017
- 286
- 819
Thanks for the update with the speedhack there is a small issue with it though when putting it to 2 times speed it's hard to choose dialogue choices because it skips one everytime. For example
- Bop <---- This one is selected
- Bip
- Bup
- Byp
At two time speed pressing the down arrow will make that Bup is selected instead of Bip.
At three time speed pressing the down arrow will make that Byp is selected instead of Bip.
Otherwise everything is great !
- Bop <---- This one is selected
- Bip
- Bup
- Byp
At two time speed pressing the down arrow will make that Bup is selected instead of Bip.
At three time speed pressing the down arrow will make that Byp is selected instead of Bip.
Otherwise everything is great !
- May 31, 2020
- 4
- 2
Im abit confused with my replace mv game files option, Idk how to make it work but ik im doing something wrong, Its just been grayed out for me, Does it only work with specific g Im just looking for answers at this point.
- Apr 9, 2017
- 286
- 819
- May 31, 2020
- 4
- 2
Thank's freind, I should've looked at the thread in more detail than being a lazy fuck, I appreciate it
Win Defender throws a "Trojan warning" the moment I open it, so this tool doesn't seem like a good option...
Windows Defender? Really? On what version of Windows? Also it's a cheat tool, it's bound to throw flags with some programs, and we covered some false positives earlier in the thread. You should just run a virus total and go based on that.
Stuff like that should be treated like a bug, because a lot of people getting that warning will never come back again, like me for example
There's nothing they can do about that. There are a million different antiviruses that are gonna throw positives for a lot of things. It's not the devs problem if people can't tell the difference between a false positive and a malicious program. If a false positive is gonna scare someone off, they're probably the type of person who shouldn't be using a tool this powerful anyway as they're likely to break their game. There are plenty of save editors for people who are only interested in that.
Win10defender is the one nearly everyone has, it's not something really uncommon
That has nothing to do with knowledge, it has to do with trust (I don't see any sign of readable source code). I really don't get why a bug like that should be OK, if everyone would develop like that, AV tools would be useless ( again: I don't speak about a rare tool nobody uses, it's win-defender )
I use Windows Defender on Windows 10 too, that's why I asked which version you're using. I've never gotten a positive on it. Maybe yours is out of date, which will cause issues with certificates/timestamps that will throw flags. You're making assertions and throwing out accusations without providing a full picture and ignoring what's already been discussed in this thread. If you gave that much of a shit you could figure out how to decompile it. But you're just here to make unfounded assertions about a program being developed by 1 guy expecting an army of tech support cuz you got a faulty virus scan, no screencaps, no version info, didn't even list the type of virus you're supposed getting a flag for. Stop while you're behind or provide some actual receipts.
My last update was today and the one before was the actual update of the day I scanned it (I keep my systems up to date)
Just use the tool if you want to, I don't trust it and won't in the future
Just use the tool if you want to, I don't trust it and won't in the future
This piece of code compiled in Visual triggered a response for the first virus you posted:
#include <stdio.h>
void main(void)
{
printf(“Hello Again!\n”);
}
Build/run:
Create a new project
C++ Windows
Console
Empty Project
Project name: helloworldc
Location: C:\Users<user>\source\repos (default)
Place solution and project in the same directory: checked
Solution Explorer
Source Files
Right click: Add new item
C++ File (.cpp)
CHANGED NAME TO: source.c
Yes, that's a hello world program built in C++. If you don't trust a program, you can do a few things to test it. Run it in a virtual machine, use a program like
You must be registered to see the links
to monitor all read/write operations from the program, and block it from communicating with the Internet using a robust firewall program like
You must be registered to see the links
. Or yea just don't use it. I'll take a closer look at it again but unless a program is embedding itself in a service somehow you can usually tell if something is off monitoring processes/network traffic/read and write operations. Not saying that I've been watching this program like a hawk for anything off but considering that it's a hacking tool that basically injects itself into an .exe like many malicious tools do, it's probably gonna trigger something.