Then you've not understood much of what I've put, let's take these apart one by one and make it clear enough for you to understand. I'll go slow for you.
Nope, I said the defining emotion of dominance is aggression (or more specifically, anger). I said nothing about any of its various features.
Anger is the only emotion that, without specific prerequisites, motivates the dom (or anyone) to take from someone else without any care for them at all - "because fucking fuck 'em, I'm going to win."
Unless you're going to argue that sexual dominance has no emotional basis, which'd be fucking odd for something that is there to cater to a desire (which is an emotional want).
Dominance (that is, control/discipline/power) is a means, not an end.
The point of control/discipline/power is not more control/discipline/power (which is very naive and childish), it's to use them to get you what you want. They're tools, not prizes. Like money, they're capital to be spent on getting you what you actually want. Fun to have lots of but pointless if not spent.
Only if that is what the dom wants to do.
And I would put it more like; the apex dom can do whatever he likes and fears no constraining reprisal for his actions because he is so dominant that there is no-one and nothing that can stop him - either now or in the future.
Though this is obviously hypothetical, such a person doesn't and won't ever exist - he's like a mythical dom monster god. Very unpleasant and we can all be glad that he cannot exist.
Yup, compassion is the emotion behind the desire to please another person (assuming a mentally healthy person).
The dom is assumed by the sub to be high status and highly competent, the sub's sexual obedience to the dom is a reward to the dom for ascending the hierarchy (at whatever relevant skill/profession/ability).
Willingness to give reward is controlled by compassion.
Literally, obviously not; but, metaphorically, obviously yes. Being cum'd on or in is akin to a mark of ownership, like a dog pissing on something.
Taint is the word you are looking for.
And further, why would I seek to dominate that which has been dominated by thousands before me? It has no worth at that point, any useless twat with £50 can do it. She has no respect for a person's worth (including her own).
All my hard work into developing my skill and competence that has allowed me to dominate is pointless in regards to a prostitute, a shift at Starcuck's would equal (or exceed) it in her eyes - £50.
Obviously, which is why nobody with any self respect wants anything to do with a prostitute (outside of their purpose).
Heh, I know right? We can all thank The Witcher 2 and Phillapa Eilheart (and whichever dwarf said it) for that one.
As I've already outlined above, you've not understood but I'll humour you here anyway.
How do you come to that conclusion?
We (or I in my playthrough's) see him with two partners, Alexia or Rowan.
His attitude to Rowan seems to be his norm (judging by how he acts otherwise and how Jez speaks to and of him), not his attitude to Alexia.
His attitude to Alexia is in fact wildly baffling and completely out of character, there's not a hint of him being anything like that outside of his scenes with her. The only reason that I can come up with is that he loves her for some reason.
I mean, one of the week end scenes is called something like "Andras frustrated".
He is raging and extremely frustrated, he comes up to Rowan and demands that he please him so that he might exorcise his frustration.
If Rowan accedes Andras very forcefully takes Rowan.
If Rowan declines Andras then states that he's off to rape Alexia instead, which Rowan can then let him do or fight him to stop him.
If Rowan fights him to stop him, Andras beats the shit out of Rowan (DC30 str to oppose, good luck) and works out his frustration that way.
If Rowan allows Andras to go off and rape his wife then as soon as Andras meets Alexia he magically transforms into a caring, controlled, patient, smug and intelligent dom - his previous raging frustration vanishes in a poof of smoke.
One of those doesn't fit.
Andras is like he is for options 1 to 3 all of the time, except when he's with Alexia. It's weird and unexplained - except, of course, by different authors writing different parts and not having a coherent picture of their character.
Again, you think that the control is the goal. No, control is the tool to obtain the goal - and we're talking specifically about sex here so the goal is sex.
If man A doesn't use that dominance then yes, he's as good a dom as a chocolate teapot is at brewing tea.
Man B is more dominant because he uses it.
Action, boy, is key.
I already am, dominant that is. I'm not some BDSM cult person with their silly toys, rituals and distractions though, cruxes making up for their personal and professional inadequacies.
Wannabe rapist, no. Fantasy rapist, yes.
Rape is literally the most common fantasy on this planet; both raping and being raped, respectively for dom and sub.
Definitely, and that scumbag should be locked up for what he did.
No, that's someone who is mentally unstable and despises themself, or thinks that they have to make up for something terrible that they've done/are doing/was done to them.
They're currently broken.
If the dom truly cared for them he'd try to help. He'd likely continue to abuse the person though, to please himself. She's said it's ok afterall.
The compassion thing is for the healthy minded.
Also, you pollute that with the asphyxiation high. I'll assume that you didn't mean to, that you simply meant a painful act.
Yes. It's a submissive hoop that the dom needs to jump through to retain a pet.
It's a practical requirement; it doesn't enhance the sexual pleasure extracted via dominance, it simply allows it to continue.
For someone that always subs, yes.
Though your "compassionate" means rewarding someone skilled and competent with sexual favours.
From the fact that every pathetic idiot loser can cum, combined with cum being a mark of ownership.
If she's been cummed on by some retard then that is now her worth too.
A one off (relationship or one nighter), or few, can be forgiven due to her not knowing her worth but many is unforgiveable - implies she genuinely feels worthless or that she's stupid and cannot learn.
There's no power in exclusively owning something worthless.
Very droll.
Explained above.
Baha, I can imagine you giggling like a child writing these. A shame that seems to be your peak.
To humour you, again, the number of sources.
Though, a thouroughly fucked sub by only you can certainly become your onahole but, not an onahole (unless that's what you are trying to make of her, prostitution/free-use/corruption - this is fantasy though, not real outside of criminality).
If you don't want to sleep with her you shouldn't marry her.
From a femdom perspective, girlcum has a similar use in a specific act/scene to cum. But, it does not have the long term ownership or taint connotations.
An inferiority complex will make the sufferer do something about whatever it is and become stronger.
A superiority complex leads stupid people to getting tricked and taken advantage of.
Confidence is then something else, so you're making a false equivalency.
Confidence is how a skilled and competent person acts when their skill and competence (at whatever) is relevant to their situation.
Someone with an inferiority complex can be confident, someone with a superiority one can be nervous.
False modesty is more impressive than false confidence, once the facade is peeled back.
Yes.
Bahahaha. It's genuinely funny how smart you think you are, I really want to pat you on the head. smh
If you think prostitutes are so respectable, go out and marry one. Because almost 99% would say yes to any man after maybe a months courtship - they know that they're equivalent to an ex-con in worth, which is almost nothing.
And any that somehow have any self respect left would say no, for your sake.
If by now you still don't get it then you're operating on the intellectual level of your hamster there.
That is a power bottom. Presents a challenge to the dom (so that the dom can prove he deserves her), who must rise to it or become the dildo-sub.
She's a cunt that knows she's a cunt and hates herself for it but is unwilling or unable to do anything about it. The punishment is her means of atoning and living with herself.
Explanations given. Have you caught up yet kid?
Though, if you're insulting for no reason and stupid, does your opinion really matter?
