People are free to say what they want to say. And there is no "futa on male" tag, thus it may come as a surprise. There is "male protagonist" and "futa/trans", this does not explicitly mean there is futa on male content.
If people were not allowed to say what they don't like and should just steer away from it, reviews would be unreliable and biased because only people who like what they see will post/comment/review.
Besides, telling creators what people don't like in the game, actually helps the creators by seeing what people are mostly interested in. It'd allow them to more efficiently use their time to create content people want. Of course, this one comment does not "show what people want", but if many more people would do the same, it would.
Let's say there's 1000 people interested in a game. 600 are not interested in futa x male, but they don't say it (because they apparently are not allowed to) and the devs just keep adding futa x male. This makes sure those 600 people start getting uninterested, which creates negative growth and time inefficiently spent for the creators.
TL;DR. Comments what people like and dislike have use. Let people say what they want to say.
Obviously, you didn't read my post thoroughly... I didn't just state TAG, but also description and/or photos. The photos clearly has a picture that says futa on male and there is a FUTA/TRANS tag, clearly the to points can be connected...
Also, if a creator puts the specific fetish into a game, it's because they like that fetish and popping in just to say, "hey, I don't like that one fetish" is like spitting in the face of the creator who does like it whether they're stating it with niceties or with negative connotation .
Did Timepants comment have vile intent, no... though, the sadface at the end when he commented about the creator "probably prefers dudes getting it in the pooper from futas," gives a feeling of kink shaming...
Are there creators out there that pick some fetish only because it sells, sure... but that's assuming, assuming is typically bad. I for one like to believe that creators who put out fetish content is doing it because they actually LIKE the fetish they are creating.
Yes, people are free to do whatever they want, how ever they want. If they want to express what they don't like to creators, so be it. But the common courtesy would be to just move on and let the creator do what they like, not pander to someone who doesn't like the fetish the creator likes.
And your what if scenario is way out there. 1000 people interested in a game that has futa x male, and 600... more than HALF, don't like the fetish associated with the game. Sorry, that is absolutely unrealistic, I don't care how much you try to spin it.
I can see that there could be a group of people who saw the futa/trans tag, try to play it only to find out it has futa x male content. That is par for the course when it comes to futa/trans content, almost mutaly connected. But it still goes back to my first statement, that if the creator likes it, they'll put it in their game.
Comments are a double edge sword, in anyway you put it. Saying they don't like a particular fetish they're using in their game may even discourage a creator to even WORK on a game, especially if we used your "what if" scenario... If more than half doesn't like the fetish the creator is using in their content, what's the point of even continuing it...
I think constructive criticism should be used. Like, if more futa x male is added to the game, maybe suggest more futa x female versus just saying you don't like futa x male, or any ADDITIONAL fetishes you'd like to see...
I don't want to make it seem like I'm ranting, but there is a right way and a not so right way of doing/saying things.
TL;DR: I don't care if you didn't read it...