Now for the ethical use of AI :
I'll be honest with you I think this is just stupid, I'm a dev, I make code, and honestly if an AI use my code to produce more code then cool. I wasn't angry when gameMaker, RPG maker, Unity or w/e allowed people that can't code able to make game, quite the opposite and I'm not going to start now.
Weak equivocation. AI is not a 'tool' in the same way a game engine is. You can't just ask Unity to 'Yo, make me a platformer
in the style of Super Mario Bros.' and let it do it's thing.
Not only I don't think AI is really violating copyright, (it's just use huge amount of data to see shape/color are likely to be close to other coupled with a data that link text with shape) but, even if it did I just don't really care. I just believe everyone should be able to share cultural objects w/e they are and be free to use them as they please. (And to be honest I find it a bit strange that someone on a pirate website is complaining about it but hee, you do you.)
First off, are you using this site to pirate stuff right now? Is this conversation we're having an act of piracy? No? Then stop being fucking obtuse. F95Zone is a site that aggregates downloadable game content and hosts accompanying forums, and the overwhelming majority of those games are freely available to the public. You are here not because F95Zone is
just a pirate website, but because it offers a
valuable platform to spread your game to a larger audience. So lets stop pretending that 'being on F95Zone' and 'using generative AI created with worldwide art theft to enrich yourself' are equivalent positions.
It is theft, because you can ask generative AI to make stuff 'in the style of' or even get it to deliver whole pages of copy-pasted copyrighted material, because all of that material was taken (without attribution or compensation) and used to train these models; models which are ultimately
commercial products. If a huge tech company takes your shit and uses it to make a profit, that's both theft and copyright infringement. Generative AI is doing that, except across the whole internet and against millions of people all at once. You might be alright with Tech-Bro Dipshits and Venture Capitalist Ghouls stealing your stuff, but that's not your decision to make for
everyone else.
Generative AI is not a computer comprehending art and learning like a human does (if it was, they would in effect be a trapped and shackled
general purpose intelligences, and using them as you do would be
digital forced labor), it is a
commercial product that could not exist if not for the metric fuck-ton of copyrighted work that was taken without attribution or compensation to refine them. Do you want to know who can afford to pay artist for their work? Billionaire venture capitalists.
I understand the issue that if AI becomes much better than it is atm, artist might have more trouble to earn a living in the future, but first I doubt it happens anytime soon. Because even if AI become hypothetically better at some task, as long as there are task they can't do, there will be artist. The same concern rose when photo happened, people where worried that artist as a career would get destroyed, but the opposite happenned, because artist future isn't tied to the fact you can't replace part of what they do to with technology, but by how much people are willing to spend in culture in other words, the amount of worker in culture (artist, musician, actor etc) is dependant on 2 things !
-How much people are still available to do it once more mandatory needs (like food, medicine having a roof) are met.
-Polical reason (money given to shareholder or used to make guns can't go to artists)
Do you use the internet at all outside of F95Zone? Serious question. Because it sounds like you haven't at all experienced how generative AI is making the whole of the internet worse for the end-user, with seemingly zero beneficial use-cases that didn't already exist before.
Google's top search result now is generative AI nonsense, and Image Search is awash in unmarked generated AI images. Amazon and Etsy are filled with zero effort dropshippers using AI to make images and text to flood the marketplaces with crap. Quora, Facebook, and Twitter are filled with bot posts and that are then swarmed with bot replies; it's bots just talking to each other. Generative AI has slapped rocket boosters to the enablement of fraud and the creation of spam, all the while gobbling up limited electricity and creating an environmentally destructive amount of CO2. Everything is being made demonstrably worse.
So if I can give you my humble opinion, you should spend more time trying to influence the politic to w/e country you live in than complaining about a game dev that use AI to make art and who wouldn't be able to pay artist more than I do even if I wanted to. Because in the end, there is absolutely no technical reason that prevent politician to redistribute wealth however they wishes, and if you wishes more wealth to go to artist, I suggest you use your time doing that.
I can do both. Also, none of this changes the fact that you could have created images without generative AI. F95Zone is filled with examples of such; weather it be the longstanding practice of machinma in repurposing game assets in new and creative ways, dedicated 3DCG models, or even just sticking with 'bad' art you created yourself (it might not be pretty, but it is honest). There are more than just the two options of 'generative AI slop born of globe spanning theft' and 'commissioning the real artist being threatened by said AI slop'.
Also I'm a bit sad with how people are overeacting about AI, really this is just business as usual. 90% of everyday product you use are made mainly with machine using the knowledge of the people they replaced. People are just waking up now because it replaces people that thought they were too smart/creative w/e to replace while until now it was mainly replacing low wage worker that had very little influence. The only reason we hear it now is because artist, lawyer, physician dev etc are people that are privileged enough to have influence of some sort. (Manual worker usualy have 0 access to mass media/ don't have an audience).
That is both ahistorical and total bullshit. At the dawn of the industrial revolution, textile mills brought automation to the textile market. Whereas before textiles were created by a large group of skilled artisans that were compensated for the work it took to make a quality product, they were being muscled out of the market by it being flooded with quickly produced and inferior products created by automation. Their very livelihoods were being threatened, their jobs displaced, by factories that made a worse product far cheaper; and all of the wealth generated by these new and worse products didn't go to factory workers, but rather was funneled up to the factory owners. It destroyed middle-class skilled artisans and enriched the already super wealthy. These textile artisans were the
You must be registered to see the links
, and they were fucking right when they fought back over a century ago.
Just an FYI, Great Britain made the sabotage of these machine (i.e. industrial sabotage) a capital crime and punishable by death. They called in the literal fucking army to quell the protesting laborers. They put on massive show trials, replete with transportation to penal colonies and executions, to scare the citizenry into submission. They crushed the Luddites with the force of the state, wielded exclusively to benefit the holders of capital.
Much like the slave holders of the antebellum South, you are on the wrong side of history on this one. Unfortunately history will very likely repeat itself; but that's more an indictment of the failure of our systems of governance to protect its citizens, rather than the
righteousness of their
exploitation.
So if you don't think I don't deserve your money fine, again I'm not posting my game on a pirate site to complain about people not giving me money. But really don't expect me to stop just because a brat ask me to, pretending I'm an evil bastard because I dare to earn 10% of my country's minimum wage making a video game and allow anyone to play it for free.
Yeah, scammers generally don't stop scamming when they get called out for it. But if you put out shite images created without any attempt to create a cohesive presentation, people are going to comment on it. If you actually cared, there are non-bullshit ways to make consistent images and create a cohesive visual presentation. But you opted for the path of least resistance, built upon the wholesale theft of people who did care enough to make their own art. Like it or not, I don't find that position worthy of respect; in the same way that I don't respect YouTube video-essay creators when they plagiarize the content of their script from other people, as no amount of work in sound recording and video editing excuses the theft of the writing. You are essentially doing the same thing, but obfuscated through a new 'tool' that adds an extra step between you and those who were stolen from.
Again, your answer is 'Fuck you, I got mine' in as many words.