Unity Something Unlimited [v2.4.7] [Gunsmoke Games]
- Thread starter Gunsmoke Games
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 2dcg anal sex animated big ass big tits corruption cosplay exhibitionism fantasy futa/trans group sex handjob harem humiliation humor interracial lesbian male protagonist management masturbation mobile game oral sex parody prostitution sci-fi sex toys spanking superpowers titfuck vaginal sex voyeurism
- Aug 4, 2017
- 216
- 709
A screenshot from SR7's stream from yesterday,you can clearly see that he is working on Lady Shiva
- Mar 28, 2017
- 12,100
- 16,415
For this game maybe,but we can expect BoB 2 update before that.
Because you updated your mac like i did, Now i cant play any unity games on my mac, shit isnt it
More Wonder Woman content would be good, preferably without hidden game objectives to be completed. And you can take her on the yacht.
Otherwise, wonderful costume mechanic (a simple five or six total for all heroines would suffice), and all the sluts could do with more of the more cooperative, but cheers all in all. I especially appreciate the myriad of hinting assholes ("Locked, Locked, Locked").
Otherwise, wonderful costume mechanic (a simple five or six total for all heroines would suffice), and all the sluts could do with more of the more cooperative, but cheers all in all. I especially appreciate the myriad of hinting assholes ("Locked, Locked, Locked").
- Feb 5, 2018
- 260
- 486
You must be registered to see the links
My blood is boiling. As a former old patreon of theirs, I simply cannot put into words how insulting that was to read. Apparently they want to live in a safespace-echo chamber.
Last edited:
- Oct 9, 2017
- 292
- 390
I'm kinda surprised that they don't realize the obvious, which is that those that would rate them lower have probably already stopped giving them money. And those that still are would obviously be significantly biased towards good ratings.
It's statistically not a very smart sample size for honest feedback, kinda like a street musician who only asks those that drop a significant amount of money into his cap if they liked his music. All the while ignoring all the negative reactions of the average people walking by.
If anything could be gleaned from this is that it's very telling that there are so few 5s from among his ardent supporters that pay 5$+ monthly. Which means that not even they think he's doing anything beyond an okay job.
- Sep 18, 2017
- 41
- 105
Pretty much. I can’t say anything on discord without getting dogpiled by white knights. And even on here my post was deleted for being off topic which it absolutely was not, nor was it insulting anyone.
I think I’m done supporting this. Not like my patronage matters. I don’t get anything from them that I can’t get here nor does my opinion matter any more as a patron than not.
- Sep 2, 2017
- 253
- 269
I'm not mad but I'm also not surprised. If you're backing him for 5 a month then you absolutely support and agree with them and how they're performing. It would've been meaningful if the $5+ supporters said they were unsatisfied but that's a rarity. People may act that way with magazine subscriptions or cable but not a Patreon game. $5/m are big numbers for patreon. if people think they're no longer getting their value they're not going to simply vote in a poll they're going to drop from the $5 bracket.
That said, if I had voted on that poll I'd have agreed with the 3 rating. It wasn't hype or anything unusiual or special, and it wasn't bad. yes, the blakscreen for needing Galatea was annoying and implementation for such scenes prob should have a different plan going forward - but it was the same type of solid release we get from SU.
I'm actually somewhat impressed that so many people voted honestly. More than 50% of their most populous category of loyal fans ($5.00+ patrons) basically just gave them a "C" or lower grade (on the A to F scale), which I can't imagine is good. (at least, in my US-based indoctrinated mind where anything less than a 5 on feedback is generally pretty bad, like when rating Ubers or Customer Service) I would have guessed most people would just blindly vote 4-5 stars.
I also don't think they're trying to insult anyone; if they gave themselves a 3 then that can't mean they're satisfied with their own work. I think the devs are just saying that they recognized there needs to be more focus on content and that they now see their patrons believe that as well... it's just worded more positively.
I'm still just waiting for a scene gallery with text and dialogue.
Last edited:
- Apr 28, 2017
- 317
- 888
Dude, they DO realize that, the intention of that poll and the way they type the post out is a direct message to this forum (or any other similar forum, if there's any), basically saying "FU, our whiteknights are loyal"
The post itself is mega dumb and that is their only purpose, to ego boost themselves, deceive some not-too-loyal patrons and mock the forums
For example, they go out of their way to say "So 75.3% of you thought the same as us!"; well, duh, obviously, when you yourself cover 3 out of 5 options as "your opinion" you will obviously end up covering most of everyone's opinion's as well, specially if its only your fanbase, and on a place where you even go out of your way to delete any criticisim post
As i said, by giving themselves a 3, they cover 3 options as "their opinion" and/or "positive" so they can say "look, everyone agrees with us"
I'm afraid that's not the case here.
"Harsh criticism is fine and we are all for that, but misinformation, and out right lies intending to hurt the creator we are not OK with. When we recognized this, we decided to just focus on our community, or places that support creators and moderate incorrect/harmful messaging. "
And as we all just saw their community starts from 5$ pledge - only one third of their patrons - and saying that "constant inability to release on time is bad" equals to a harmful lie.
- Feb 5, 2018
- 260
- 486
- Jul 27, 2018
- 690
- 1,028
I can understand everyones frustration.
I can also understand what gunsmoke is saying.
I guess if forums like this want to stay around we must be honest and not just one sided
Yes we can bring frustration s but we can't overdo it otherwise they may find z way to shut this area down.
Hopefully this will work out for us and it will encourage them to provide more content
Can you quote something "dishonest" from this thread?
- Oct 5, 2017
- 7,464
- 9,903
Hugely insulting. I've kept a basic pledge active for ages as after the bug fixes come out the game is good, but after being spat on like that I'm done with it. If they don't care for my opinion I don't care to keep supporting them.
Under the circumstances, this poll seems super shady. Because it was either a "We know we phoned in the update. Haha, oops! " or perhaps a reassurance they can step over their self-imposed deadlines/policies on the fly. The obvious voter bias that others mentioned aside, why are they relieved that 57% of people who pay them thought the update was aggressively -Meh- or worse? A sweet cherry I found on that post was a guy mentioning he didn't vote because the update was so whatever to him he couldn't be bothered. Save your dosh my man!
Compounded on the fact a cycle was skipped with 4 months since the previous update, they botched their "release windows" going almost a full additional window of 4 days, and the first update of this new year being -Meh- is a win? Although let's be honest, when you consider they raked in 4 months of probably 12-16k and the most delayed release isn't given a concrete reason as to why outside of a milquetoast thanks for being patientanyone in their shoes would consider that a huge win too.
Earlier in the year they declared "Fuck Roadmaps and Fuck Focus". They'll probably adhere to the older heroines they mentioned although I can't see evidence why we should expect anything other than multiple updates of: 2 costumes>dance>strip>leash per girl/update.
And with half this current cycle done and gone, the only insight we have is one missing scene with Lady Shiva from the cleanup. All I can say is:
" or perhaps a reassurance they can step over their self-imposed deadlines/policies on the fly. The obvious voter bias that others mentioned aside, why are they relieved that 57% of people who pay them thought the update was aggressively -Meh- or worse? A sweet cherry I found on that post was a guy mentioning he didn't vote because the update was so whatever to him he couldn't be bothered. Save your dosh my man!Compounded on the fact a cycle was skipped with 4 months since the previous update, they botched their "release windows" going almost a full additional window of 4 days, and the first update of this new year being -Meh- is a win? Although let's be honest, when you consider they raked in 4 months of probably 12-16k and the most delayed release isn't given a concrete reason as to why outside of a milquetoast thanks for being patient
anyone in their shoes would consider that a huge win too.Earlier in the year they declared "Fuck Roadmaps and Fuck Focus". They'll probably adhere to the older heroines they mentioned although I can't see evidence why we should expect anything other than multiple updates of: 2 costumes>dance>strip>leash per girl/update.
And with half this current cycle done and gone, the only insight we have is one missing scene with Lady Shiva from the cleanup. All I can say is:
- Jul 26, 2017
- 24
- 50
It's nice to see Lex get a little more physical, but I'm hoping he can do so with one of the heroines that don't have content yet. Maybe Stargirl or Huntress have a secret fetish for being choked and abused or something, that would be pretty hot.