Please, lets not do thisEasy he's white and a man. there's no affinity group to complain about it and when there is they are declared white supremacists, and/or male chauvinists with fragile egos also known as white fragelity by the sjws
Please, lets not do thisEasy he's white and a man. there's no affinity group to complain about it and when there is they are declared white supremacists, and/or male chauvinists with fragile egos also known as white fragelity by the sjws
I agree.Please, lets not do this
Fuck your culture war bullshit. Take it to RedditEasy he's white and a man. there's no affinity group to complain about it and when there is they are declared white supremacists, and/or male chauvinists with fragile egos also known as white fragelity by the sjws
Fair.I kinda just wanted to point out they won't like Batman go down on Catwoman...but will do all kinds of twisted stuff instead.
The stalker's name was Tarantula. I just find it weird that having a yandere in the comics was okay (there were several of them in the comics if you squint), but a moment of intimacy? No...we can't have in an animated show meant for adults.Fair.
Good ol' USA... More afraid of a penis than a hundred atom bombs!I kinda just wanted to point out they won't let them Batman go down on Catwoman...but will do all kinds of twisted stuff instead.
i have no problem with there being a yandere character, my problem is how its downplayed. i mean, she even tried to make him sign a marriage contract while drunk... and isnt she supposed to be a hero as well?The stalker's name was Tarantula. I just find it weird that having a yandere in the comics was okay (there were several of them in the comics if you squint), but a moment of intimacy? No...we can't have in an animated show meant for adults.
Now now, we all know that accidental sighting of penis can scar the youth for a lifetime, where as after atom bombs, they don't have to worry about anything.Good ol' USA... More afraid of a penis than a hundred atom bombs!
You must be registered to see the links
If this is the case, I wonder if things are any different with Disney.They already had that battle a couple of years ago. Since Patreon is seen as a tip jar and the end result is to be released for free, all DC/ Warner Bros. could do is request the name being changed to something other than "Injustice Unlimited". Hence why it's "Something Unlimited". So while parody is transformative (even though DC has tried to get pretty risky) the real thing that won GG the case was the intent of the end result to be released for free.
An unfinished work can be declared a violation of copyright law, but since none of the Patreons are forced into pledging, and this is all at the will of the creator, then the proceeds are seen as donation and not "for-profit". If the game were finished and being sold for money that would be for profit and violation. While many professional coders could make the argument that version 2.xxx is the designation for the second version of a finished product, GG has wisely put a screen at the game's start saying "work in progress".
tl;dr Been there, done that, got away scott free, its a game being played in the gray areas of the law rn.
That's all a function of blast radius, pretty sure burn scars also last a lifetime (well, unless with skin grafts)Now now, we all know that accidental sighting of penis can scar the youth for a lifetime, where as after atom bombs, they don't have to worry about anything.
Disney IS Star Wars...Is it different with Disney? It shouldn't be right?
Yes I know. Similarly DC is Justice League. So my question was that if the dev of SU can legally continue this game (provided the previous poster is correct), then shouldn't the dev of Orange Trainer be able to continue his game? I know Disney and DC are different companies, but the law should apply the same right? Hope it's more clear now.Disney IS Star Wars...
DC being more lenient with copyrights doesn't mean Disney won't go batshit crazy at the mere mention of some1 drawing anything resembling 1 of their IP. Just check Nintendo's record on takedowns compared to every other game companyYes I know. Similarly DC is Justice League. So my question was that if the dev of SU can legally continue this game (provided the previous poster is correct), then shouldn't the dev of Orange Trainer be able to continue his game? I know Disney and DC are different companies, but the law should apply the same right? Hope it's more clear now.
If it's a matter of leniency then I get it. I just took the previous post to mean that SU continues not because DC is lenient, but because the dev can legally make this game. Which begged the question about Disney.DC being more lenient with copyrights doesn't mean Disney won't go batshit crazy at the mere mention of some1 drawing anything resembling 1 of their IP. Just check Nintendo's record on takedowns compared to every other game company
You seem to misunderstand. Disney is infamously litigious... WB less so (or at it was WB at the time, now it's some weird WB Discovery channel mishmash, so they're as likely to be more litigious as they are could give 2 shits).Yes I know. Similarly DC is Justice League. So my question was that if the dev of SU can legally continue this game (provided the previous poster is correct), then shouldn't the dev of Orange Trainer be able to continue his game? I know Disney and DC are different companies, but the law should apply the same right? Hope it's more clear now.
From your perspective, that's a lot (216K/year before Patreon takes their cut, assuming average never changes). From the perspective of a billion dollar corporation, that's worth a cease-and-desist letter, not a multi-year lawsuit... not that it would ever get that far, 18K a month ain't worth paying lawyer bills. Plus, publicity might compound issues.18K a month.
Actually Nightwing is Romani, he's a literal gypsy and has been for decades. Plenty of bigotry and racism is still pointed towards people of that ethnic group regardless of their skin colour. If you're going to post nonsense you could at least do the 15 seconds of research it would take to make sure your nonsense has any basis.Easy he's white and a man. there's no affinity group to complain about it and when there is they are declared white supremacists, and/or male chauvinists with fragile egos also known as white fragelity by the sjws