JValkonian
Member
- Nov 29, 2022
- 323
- 294
- 146
MY HERO
I did not even see the Manager button
My eyes stopped at Load Default LOL
Thank you!
MY HERO
I have figure it outhow to get the --xformers to work with the new version of AUTOMATIC1111 version v1.7.0
have tried using set COMMANDLINE_ARGS=--allow-code --xformers in the environment.bat but
nothing is working
run.bat
Echo off
call environment.bat
cd %~dp0webui
call webui-user.bat
environment.bat
Echo off
set DIR=%~dp0system
set COMMANDLINE_ARGS=--allow-code --xformers
set PATH=%DIR%\git\bin;%DIR%\python;%DIR%\python\Scripts;%PATH%
set PY_LIBS=%DIR%\python\Scripts\Lib;%DIR%\python\Scripts\Lib\site-packages
set PY_PIP=%DIR%\python\Scripts
set SKIP_VENV=1
set PIP_INSTALLER_LOCATION=%DIR%\python\get-pip.py
set TRANSFORMERS_CACHE=%DIR%\transformers-cache
I made this SAME mistake two days ago trying to install xformers kept getting errors, then after I added --xformers to webui-user.bat, it installed, poof no more errors LOL. No idea why I did not try that FIRST.I have figure it out
how to install xformers
go to webui folder then open webui-user.bat then paste --xformers and save
If i remember you have to edit .bat file (run_nvidia_gpu.bat or run_cpu.bat) and add at the end --listen like:Hello, I use A1111 with the --listen argument, so that I can run A1111 on one computer with a 3090 and use it on another.
I want to try Comfy, but is there a similar function in it ?
.\python_embeded\python.exe -s ComfyUI\main.py --windows-standalone-build --listen
Thats really impressive!Using the same prompt and method as posted a few posts above, but using a anime model for the base, and then doing the denoising and upscaling on photo models.
the "base" image:
View attachment 3392299
After some simple denoising and upscalings, no controlnet or other such things involved:
View attachment 3392298
Brother, may I kindly ask you to always have workflows included with your images? If one can't pop your CUI render into CUI actual then these gorgeous images belong in the art sharing thread. I trust we've been through these a few times, so next time I'll be asking the mods to just move these images to the art thread. Yes, I know, there are good reasons why you post the images the way you do, and this is what that other art thread is for. I mean this in a supportive way.This is a series of images using an increasing number of "steps" in an iterative upscaling. Upscaling is to 1.5 and steps/iterations is 3-8 (number in each filename), using a decreasing denoise. As an example first upscaling would be denoising of 0.5 and an upscale to 1.2 of original size, and the last would be 0.1 and 1.5 of original size with the steps inbetween being distributed equally. (not the actual values as i cba doing the math etc for all of it, so purely for representation.) Workflow is using the same type of setup i posted a while ago regarding this method.
You can see how the detailing increase and/or changes elements, but it generally doesn't add massively over done areas. There's some oddities that pop in, but they also get "fixed" in later images.
Might not be of too much interest, but there's boobs...which is usually a good thing...
View attachment 3388902 View attachment 3388901 View attachment 3388900 View attachment 3388899 View attachment 3388898 View attachment 3388897
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
I switched to Forge recently and I don't regret it. Try it out. You can keep using the checkpoint models in the old folder by editing the user.bat file with filepaths for the different folders. Olivio Sarika made an excellent tutorial. If you don't like it then you will simply delete Forge, no harm, no foul.. However if you choose to switch it's easy enough to simply cut/paste everything over to the new folders. My experience is that Forge is much more stable and faster than A1111. It comes with a bunch of very useful extensions that likely is unfamiliar. I would likely not have found these extensions on my own. Forge allowed me to get back into SDXL, that I had given up on because it were so slow and problematic with my old GPU.You must be registered to see the links1.8 is out now. have someone tested it? is good to switch or i stay in 1.5.2? i ask because v1.7 are really bad, and i overvrite it with Forge. Please share your impression about v1.8, thanks.
can you give a link to ForgeI switched to Forge recently and I don't regret it. Try it out. You can keep using the checkpoint models in the old folder by editing the user.bat file with filepaths for the different folders. Olivio Sarika made an excellent tutorial. If you don't like it then you will simply delete Forge, no harm, no foul.. However if you choose to switch it's easy enough to simply cut/paste everything over to the new folders. My experience is that Forge is much more stable and faster than A1111. It comes with a bunch of very useful extensions that likely is unfamiliar. I would likely not have found these extensions on my own. Forge allowed me to get back into SDXL, that I had given up on because it were so slow and problematic with my old GPU.
View attachment 3403183
This image uses the same workflow, except it's about 1/3 of the nodes as i were testing the advanced clip nodes to test the weight interpretation and have more "a1111 like" prompts to share. So almost all nodes were tripled run the comfy, comfy++ and a1111 interpretations at the same time.Brother, may I kindly ask you to always have workflows included with your images? If one can't pop your CUI render into CUI actual then these gorgeous images belong in the art sharing thread. I trust we've been through these a few times, so next time I'll be asking the mods to just move these images to the art thread. Yes, I know, there are good reasons why you post the images the way you do, and this is what that other art thread is for. I mean this in a supportive way.
Would be superb if you could add workflows to these two posts:
https://f95zone.to/threads/stable-diffusion-prompt-sharing-and-learning-thread.146036/post-13072217
https://f95zone.to/threads/stable-diffusion-prompt-sharing-and-learning-thread.146036/post-13062006
Is the vram use/need with SDXL much lower than in a1111?I switched to Forge recently and I don't regret it. Try it out. You can keep using the checkpoint models in the old folder by editing the user.bat file with filepaths for the different folders. Olivio Sarika made an excellent tutorial. If you don't like it then you will simply delete Forge, no harm, no foul.. However if you choose to switch it's easy enough to simply cut/paste everything over to the new folders. My experience is that Forge is much more stable and faster than A1111. It comes with a bunch of very useful extensions that likely is unfamiliar. I would likely not have found these extensions on my own. Forge allowed me to get back into SDXL, that I had given up on because it were so slow and problematic with my old GPU.
View attachment 3403183
It depends on the GPU you have. If you have a lower end card you will make bigger gains. If you have a high end card you will get, I don't remember exactly but lets say 5-10% perhaps, probably a little less. It's very noticeable for me at least with an old GTX1070. The biggest thing is that Forge is more stable, less bugs and better memory management. Each user case scenario will be different because each PC hardware component makes a difference in the end even though the GPU is the big thing.Is the vram use/need with SDXL much lower than in a1111?
Yes, i say something about Forge here, i'm totally in accord with you. Better experience than a1111.I switched to Forge recently and I don't regret it. Try it out. You can keep using the checkpoint models in the old folder by editing the user.bat file with filepaths for the different folders. Olivio Sarika made an excellent tutorial. If you don't like it then you will simply delete Forge, no harm, no foul.. However if you choose to switch it's easy enough to simply cut/paste everything over to the new folders. My experience is that Forge is much more stable and faster than A1111. It comes with a bunch of very useful extensions that likely is unfamiliar. I would likely not have found these extensions on my own. Forge allowed me to get back into SDXL, that I had given up on because it were so slow and problematic with my old GPU.
View attachment 3403183
link inside quoted 3ad.can you give a link to Forge
For who love a1111 there are a fork version calledYou must be registered to see the links, this version seem apply benefit of CUI memory managment in a1111, also add some features actually i've not tested.
I tested it as standard, like running a1111 and i'm impressed on speed and result, also go up on resolution without getting OOM error. generat a 1000x1280 sd1.5 image (limit of my model allow before getting double), is about 1.5 it/s (in a1111 896x115 is 1.2 it/s).
But i reached max speed by adding "--cuda-malloc" "--pin-shared-memory" "--cuda-stream" in webui-user.bat. With these option i reach 1.9 it/s!
Also all images without hires.fix and without upscale, native 1000x1280 cfg16.2 18step.
Some extension not work atm, but mayor extension work like a charm.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
For try it i suggest copy your a1111 folder, and extract forge in top of it, overwrite when required. run.
Remember to reinstall torch and xformers because forge want new version(but work also in old version).
You shared settings? No I always find my own. 3ad? I'm not sure what that refers to.Yes, i say something about Forge here, i'm totally in accord with you. Better experience than a1111.
Actually i don't have time to test a1111 1.8, maybe i try it later, but Forge seem optimized a lot than a1111.
Did you run with same option i wrote in quoted 3ad?
link inside quoted 3ad.
Respectfully I am new to this, just recently installed everything last night - are you able to share what Model and LoRA if any for these renderings? And maybe even the prompt? Really like the appearance. Any help would be appreciated.Fucking money right here
View attachment 2360961
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Interestingly, I can get decent renders of something like an E60 Chassis BMW 5 series, but something less ubiquitous (like my once loved SAAB 9000 Aero) becomes a jumbled mess. Ditto for aircraft, I am an aviation photographer, and I have tried 3 or 4 different AI image generation tools, and even a simple F-15C comes out as a jumbled mess, with perhaps even a third intake. They also look really Macross which is cool, but I was looking for an F-15, not a VF-1. You guys do some beautiful work here, I will post up my newbie stuff when I go downstairs to my Windows PC. I met Jimwalrus from another Board, and he has been so helpful.I gave up on vehicles, it was just another element sd could get wrong.
You can open most files with notepad and the file should include the meta at the top of the file showing how the image was generated. In this particular case:Respectfully I am new to this, just recently installed everything last night - are you able to share what Model and LoRA if any for these renderings? And maybe even the prompt? Really like the appearance. Any help would be appreciated.
can you give a link to Forge