I find Starwatch interesting but I have to admit that I find it a bit strange that "conflicts" are radically reduced to noble vs non-noble. For example: Thomas vs Edward in the emergency exercise - firstly, in a situation like this, "origin" shouldn't play a role, and secondly, it's not really clear why the two are actually arguing, and third, the personal reason you have for being for or against one or the other isn't taken into account in the evaluation afterwards - I decided against Thomas because I think he's a lousy leader. I didn't really notice that Edward was a "noble" - I thought they were just arguing about leadership and a leader who has to use force to get his way is not a leader... in the evaluation she just babbled about how I should have chosen Thomas simply because he is not noble ... In a situation like this, I'm for option c - collect both of them even if they're both idiots because "origin" shouldn't play a role or something more radical d - leave both of them behind and let them die because "origin" shouldn't play a role... just my 2 cent's