i sort f95 through ratings so 1 star is too harsh cuz it has the potential to bring down the average.How do you feel about giving negative reviews on story criteria for games that clearly have a plot, but where the dev obviously gave other stuff like kinks and edgy nonsense more priority than a good plot, good characterisation, or even good spelling and grammar? There's a VN I played a while back and I think it's terrible in a few ways and overrated. It's clear I'm not the audience and the kinks weren't for me, though that wasn't too obvious from the tags, and I don't think low scores are fair just if something has kinks I dislike. But plot and other aspects of writing are like way more fundamental for a VN. I think it's normal that "story fundamentals" have more weight if a game's in a genre where story is important, but should they ever make the difference between 1 and 5 stars?
I guess I'm really asking if I should start giving 1-star reviews. But also how important is story in your ratings, again only for games where this is relevant, and what are your reasons for it?
No I won't name or link the VN.
Negative reviews in itself are fine though.
I'm generalizing here, developers have to choose between two road when making a game, write a game where it's smut-first or write a game where it's story-first. Ultimately, devs need to earn money from their efforts.
My take on this is that reviews should be based on what the game is aiming to be. If it aims to be a smut-first kinda game, then the reviews should be based on that. And vice versa with game that aims to have good story, the reviews are based on the story.
Story is very important in my own personal preference. Especially these days where I don't have as much time to play as I'd like. But if the game doesn't aim to prioritize it's story, instead prioritizing something else, for example Choices for Good Girls Gone Bad, or Smut for Game of Hearts, then both those games doesn't deserve 1-star rating. Negative reviews on the other hand, by all means.
Last edited: