EmilIrving

Member
Jun 29, 2017
101
179
Also, if you claim the original steam page referenced it as a porn version of Mass Effect, you can always dig that page out with waybackmachine and show us right?
Kind of curious about that honesty, I don't recall the steam page holding that description. I only remember anything pointing directly to Mass Effect would be the teaser trailer where Studio Fow made fun of the third game's endings.
 

Joshua Tree

Conversation Conqueror
Jul 10, 2017
6,158
6,585
Kind of curious about that honesty, I don't recall the steam page holding that description. I only remember anything pointing directly to Mass Effect would be the teaser trailer where Studio Fow made fun of the third game's endings.
EVERYONE made fun of that ending, and the players made such a riot that Bioware had to go back and fix a LESS worse ending. The original ending took a giant dump on players that had played the entire series. You could tell the real talent at Bioware did wane over the years. And then we got the Mass Effect Andromeda with all the mongo faces.. good job Bioware :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: Enigmanic

NBV

Member
Jun 26, 2017
177
610
Uh... they said "Mass Effect" like exploration..... of which the game have. If you refute that, then you should go back and play Mass Effect and move your little spaceship around planets and what not to find shit to do.

And I believe they said romance like plots you would see in Mass Effect just with lots of lewd shit.

Also, if you claim the original steam page referenced it as a porn version of Mass Effect, you can always dig that page out with waybackmachine and show us right?
You're being completely disingenuous if you're going to use the argument that they were only referring to Mass Effect's ship phases for exploration. They promised and answered Q/A questions in ways that implied there would be things that they have since rolled back on to avoid upsetting a subset of fans. You acknowledged this many times before, but you insist of pretending people are grasping for content they never promised or eluded to the game having.

I've already posted the past steam pages or references to their kickstarter pages in past conversations with you involved. You've just chosen to ignore them when they were posted. There's a lot of lewd things they teased they would add, only for them to be removed from their pages and never mentioned again.

1654031689685.png

It took many patches for them to even acknowledge that they had to add these, which still aren't implemented yet. They're only NOW adding foreplay to these scenes that backers kept giving feedback on the scenes feeling empty without them.
1654032235237.png

EDIT: Here's one convo where you pulled the same convo your doing now and then had to weasel around it after the fact was shown. https://f95zone.to/threads/subverse-v0-4-5-studio-fow.77900/post-6797552
 
Last edited:

Joshua Tree

Conversation Conqueror
Jul 10, 2017
6,158
6,585
You're being completely disingenuous if you're going to use the argument that they were only referring to Mass Effect's ship phases for exploration. They promised and answered Q/A questions in ways that implied there would be things that they have since rolled back on to avoid upsetting a subset of fans. You acknowledged this many times before, but you insist of pretending people are grasping for content they never promised or eluded to the game having.

You failed to provide steam did show it as Mass Effect of Porn back then too..

And post a stretch goal about scenes they already said will be coming, the loyality ones. idk that about. You don't decide what order content get released in early access. they do..
 

NBV

Member
Jun 26, 2017
177
610
You failed to provide steam did show it as Mass Effect of Porn back then too..

And post a stretch goal about scenes they already said will be coming, the loyality ones. idk that about. You don't decide what order content get released in early access. they do..
You can't use the Wayback Machine on adult steam games. It requires you to login and you can't login on a snapshot machine website. All we can do is point to the current pages they still have up that mentioned Mass Effect exploration.

1654033777298.png

And the crux of my point is that they did promise backers things that they have walked back on. Now they're universe excuse is that it's a "game with porn, not a porn game", despite advertising it as the apex of porn games.
1654033976031.png

Didn't they say one of their pre-Taron or Ela updates that they were going to roll out some of their Pandora changes but never did? I know I don't decide they're order, but they shouldn't overpromise things either. If they couldn't make it happen, just say so in a dev diary. Going dark on that front and pretending like the "Pandora Overhauls" discussion wasn't a thing is not the way to go.
 

droglob

Active Member
Aug 26, 2017
711
1,709
People really have unrealistic expectations with regards to speed and small teams. Four elements trainer took forever, but it ended up awesome.
Don't you know how this works?

Average WEG scammer copy pasting gifs into HTML?
Great game! Take your time, making porn games is hard! God bless!

Studio FOW?
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
 

NBV

Member
Jun 26, 2017
177
610
Don't you know how this works?

Average WEG scammer copy pasting gifs into HTML?
Great game! Take your time, making porn games is hard! God bless!

Studio FOW?
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
What upsets people the most is when developers or their most die-hard white knights tend to be dishonest with how they reply to feedback and negativity. Maybe it'd help if people stopped pretending every person who says their disappointed with aspects of the game are freeloading non-backers or stop grouping them all into a camp of people "REEEING"?

Other WEG devs don't get 2-4 million in funding when they pretend 15 second loops are okay.
 

droglob

Active Member
Aug 26, 2017
711
1,709
What upsets people the most is when developers or their most die-hard white knights tend to be dishonest with how they reply to feedback and negativity. Maybe it'd help if people stopped pretending every person who says their disappointed with aspects of the game are freeloading non-backers or stop grouping them all into a camp of people "REEEING"?

Other WEG devs don't get 2-4 million in funding when they pretend 15 second loops are okay.
it looks like you typed a lot of words but all that got through was passive aggressive bullshit and hypocrisy.

WAIT WAIT WAIT
3 letter name? Am i misremembering or are you the resident anti FOW off his meds? I might legit be misremembering but he's bound to be around here and you're starting to ring a bell.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: SemyonPutin

Deleted member 324588

Engaged Member
Dec 9, 2017
2,738
6,872
it looks like you typed a lot of words but all that got through was passive aggressive bullshit and hypocrisy.
decided to peek in (have him ignored), and that milestone is planned for the devotion quest line, which’ll be when the gals are maxed out. Which we still aren’t close to doing yet. DEMI’s close, around 36 or so, assuming the max is 40.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: SemyonPutin

James1980

Member
Feb 17, 2018
101
106
Sorry to interrupt the this game is fraud vs this game meets expectations argument.
I have a question I was wondering if anyone could answer.

Have they changed the grid combat camera at all or at least allowed for zooming in and out?

I haven't touched the game since launch and my biggest gripe with it was how lackluster the grid combat looked. It was very much not visually appealing to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Razrback16

Hongfire Survivor

Active Member
Mar 28, 2020
675
1,742
You can't use the Wayback Machine on adult steam games. It requires you to login and you can't login on a snapshot machine website. All we can do is point to the current pages they still have up that mentioned Mass Effect exploration.

View attachment 1842611

And the crux of my point is that they did promise backers things that they have walked back on. Now they're universe excuse is that it's a "game with porn, not a porn game", despite advertising it as the apex of porn games.
View attachment 1842621

Didn't they say one of their pre-Taron or Ela updates that they were going to roll out some of their Pandora changes but never did? I know I don't decide they're order, but they shouldn't overpromise things either. If they couldn't make it happen, just say so in a dev diary. Going dark on that front and pretending like the "Pandora Overhauls" discussion wasn't a thing is not the way to go.
Pandora should have been side content AFTER the game was done.

Instead, its a cheap way to toss in some eh scenes while they actually finish the game.

SMH.
 

NBV

Member
Jun 26, 2017
177
610
it looks like you typed a lot of words but all that got through was passive aggressive bullshit and hypocrisy.

WAIT WAIT WAIT
3 letter name? Am i misremembering or are you the resident anti FOW off his meds? I might legit be misremembering but he's bound to be around here and you're starting to ring a bell.
Didn't you jumped in the thread to make a shitty strawman generalization of everyone? Both your first post and this second one, especially the whole "3 letter name" part is just shitposting quality.

Sorry to interrupt the this game is fraud vs this game meets expectations argument.
I have a question I was wondering if anyone could answer.

Have they changed the grid combat camera at all or at least allowed for zooming in and out?

I haven't touched the game since launch and my biggest gripe with it was how lackluster the grid combat looked. It was very much not visually appealing to me.
Unless you're referring to something I don't understand, it hasn't been changed. It didn't bother me much personally though. Giving us the option to move the camera would be nice though.
 

droglob

Active Member
Aug 26, 2017
711
1,709
Didn't you jumped in the thread to make a shitty strawman generalization of everyone? Both your first post and this second one, especially the whole "3 letter name" part is just shitposting quality.


Unless you're referring to something I don't understand, it hasn't been changed. It didn't bother me much personally though. Giving us the option to move the camera would be nice though.
yeah, you are 100% the /aco/ tourist off his meds based on that guy having you ignored and just this interaction. No i jumped in this thread to state a literal, observable fact, like it or not. Then i got someone with nothing to do with their time accusing me of "grouping" people in literally the same post where he lumps me with his pet peeve group based entirely on one interaction. I won't ignore you but please refrain from making sounds in my general direction again, thanks.
 
  • Thinking Face
Reactions: VerticeLupus

Deleted member 324588

Engaged Member
Dec 9, 2017
2,738
6,872
Sorry to interrupt the this game is fraud vs this game meets expectations argument.
I have a question I was wondering if anyone could answer.

Have they changed the grid combat camera at all or at least allowed for zooming in and out?

I haven't touched the game since launch and my biggest gripe with it was how lackluster the grid combat looked. It was very much not visually appealing to me.
they’ve cleaned up the visuals, and there’s plenty of map variety now. Whether that’ll satisfy you is up to you.
 

Deleted member 324588

Engaged Member
Dec 9, 2017
2,738
6,872
Pandora should have been side content AFTER the game was done.

Instead, its a cheap way to toss in some eh scenes while they actually finish the game.

SMH.
Or, just a theory, they put in not as many scenes so they could get enough feedback that they wouldn’t have to scrap everything and start over.

can only imagine how much crap they’d have gotten had they stuck to their 100% completed game then release plan.
 

NBV

Member
Jun 26, 2017
177
610
yeah, you are 100% the /aco/ tourist off his meds based on that guy having you ignored and just this interaction. No i jumped in this thread to state a literal, observable fact, like it or not. Then i got someone with nothing to do with their time accusing me of "grouping" people in literally the same post where he lumps me with his pet peeve group based entirely on one interaction. I won't ignore you but please refrain from making sounds in my general direction again, thanks.
No, you're wrong. I do find it absolutely hilarious that some drama you were involved in on 4chan has gotten you so flustered that you're bringing it up here.
 

EmilIrving

Member
Jun 29, 2017
101
179
EVERYONE made fun of that ending, and the players made such a riot that Bioware had to go back and fix a LESS worse ending. The original ending took a giant dump on players that had played the entire series. You could tell the real talent at Bioware did wane over the years. And then we got the Mass Effect Andromeda with all the mongo faces.. good job Bioware :p
I was one of the black sheeps that didn't make fun of it, due to feeling completely drained from the realization that nothing mattered in the end. And didn't want to finish the other four Shepards that I made and played back from when the original first game came out, only played the MP since then (cause Fury, after unlocking through the lootbox system back then...) Only to completely stop playing the game completely once the Extended Cut was released, using the same Shepard that I finished.
I have to say that they technically got the Mass Effect exploration through the map system, the only other Mass Effect exploration was the first game's mako moments... And all I can remember, that are not part of the main story (or that Station DLC) but the side quests instead, was bland... boring... boosting up and jumping up mountains while being shot at while blasting Geth or Batarians. Granted, if Studio Fow used the money to do this, I would be impressed... for all of ten seconds and wouldn't be surprised if that kind of exploration was just like the run of the mill Mako explorations.
And the crux of my point is that they did promise backers things that they have walked back on. Now they're universe excuse is that it's a "game with porn, not a porn game", despite advertising it as the apex of porn games.
View attachment 1842621

Didn't they say one of their pre-Taron or Ela updates that they were going to roll out some of their Pandora changes but never did? I know I don't decide they're order, but they shouldn't overpromise things either. If they couldn't make it happen, just say so in a dev diary. Going dark on that front and pretending like the "Pandora Overhauls" discussion wasn't a thing is not the way to go.
I haven't checked on the other promises to Backers about the Station DLC that those that spent a lot of money for (I only spent enough to get the calender), but they have walked back on the EA... only to walk back on THAT and still hand out the EA, and I still got all the backer stuff so I cannot say I got shafted, but I am waiting to see what the other Backers (if they are around) got to say.

On that note, however, I cannot help but notice that ability to change the Captain's skin color was removed, don't know when that happened though...

Also about that image, I do remember constantly checking the lab (aka spamming it), I never heard any moans and Lily was never missing when that post was being spread around. So I would take that post with a massive grain of salt, and this is coming from someone that was incredibly irked that Studio Fow was withholding a video of theirs (Project Snow) until their twitter page had enough followers, when they were losing them, until Subverse was announced and became known.
 
3.00 star(s) 310 Votes