EXACTLY! Like they constantly compare this game to AAA titles, but AAA titles dont give you playable content multiple times a year, they don't maintain ANYWHERE NEAR the level of communication this Dev team does, they dont ask the community for what they'd like to see in the game, they DO take upwards of 3-5 years to produce anything playable at all, though.
Ultimately, there is a difference between constructive criticism and self-entitled whining/complaining. Too bad the vast majority of what goes on in this thread is far and away the latter.
I have not seen much of nonsense for a long time.
For the AAA title, you pay once or, additionally, for extensions, you pay extra.
And you have in most cases a very extensive product. Whether it's good or not, it's just a matter of taste.
If someone is a patron of DC and pays even $ 5 a month, he has already paid several times more than the cost of the AAA title. And the SS only has about half of the planned content.
Simply put, the cost / effect ratio for the SS Patron is extremely weak.
Well ... in the end it is sponsoring and not buying a specific product, and in total there is no reason to expect a reasonable level of costs
SS / DC critics and supporters are not much different. Their only direction is different.
Followers are also uncritical, they look at the SS through so-called pink glasses and think that the game is great and DC is great.
Unfortunately, the realities are such and not different.
The Roxxy upgrade was great.
The Diane update is the so-called bottom and meter of silt.
Only blinded and uncritical fan, can be considered something good after which we have such errors as the scene from the living room where we see Diane on the couch and when we click on the tv Diane disappears and turns on the scene with Debbie or Jenny.
And we've been waiting for this update for almost half a year.
And I hope that no idiot will write to me that I can not criticize if I am not a Patron. I was a $ 5 Patron for seven months and I think I "acquired" the right to criticize.
