I don't see how me saying monster power (especially Michael's) inside MC = interference with his regen is equivalent to me saying Michael can affect electrons with his radiation, nor do I see how that would even be relevant.It's not about a different interpretation, it's your own words and what they actually mean.
You said;
That's you saying Michael can emit ionising radiation.
You're not using those words because you didn't know that's what it was, and just keep throwing "monster radiation" around, but that's what your magical "monster radiation" actually is - Ionising Radiation, the same thing that killed him as part of his ascension from human to superhuman.
Therefore, you did answer my question and you do support my assertion, you just don't realise it!
- Thread starter WeirdWorld
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 2dcg anal sex big ass big tits bukkake creampie dilf exhibitionism futa/trans gay graphic violence group sex handjob harem horror humor interracial lactation lesbian male domination male protagonist masturbation multiple penetration netorare oral sex romance sex toys superpowers tentacles titfuck transformation trap vaginal sex virgin voyeurism
You need to brush up on your understanding of the effects of ionising radiation...
If I remember my chemistry correctly, ionizing radiation is when radiation has enough energy to knock electrons out of atoms, but that doesn't answer how this relates to anything I said.
You need to brush up on your understanding of the effects of ionising radiation...
Are you gonna continue acting like you're some hidden genius and I'm an ignoramus, or are you gonna say how that explanation is wrong and why that's even relevant? I don't mind being wrong, let alone in chemistry of all things, but the things you've been saying for a while now amount to little more than absolutely nothing. If you think I'm wrong and wanna prove it, then explain.
Though, beyond the technical stuff I don't care for, I think this explanation is sufficient to get the idea.
Dinoflaggelate
Member
- Apr 17, 2024
- 226
- 982
As I understand it, Michael's attacks inhibit regeneration on two fronts. One natural, one supernatural. Firstly, his attacks are ionizing radiation. That causes heat that physically burns cells, as well as lyzing cell membranes, damaging DNA, and causing the formation of toxic ionic compounds. All of those are things that would prevent healing. Secondly, at least his radiation blade has been described as also channeling corrupted life energy into what he cuts with it. That impedes supernatural abilities that would heal the target. His other attacks might do that as well, we haven't been given any narration indicating it, but it's possible. Still, with multiple ways for Michael to block healing, he's a real danger to anything that isn't a huge cheater like that Drek monster.
Replaying the game gave me a lot of meme material until next update:
Dipasimaan
Active Member
- Feb 22, 2019
- 740
- 6,626
You're getting that reaction because the idea that a nuclear detonation is incomparable to core of the sun doesn't make much sense. The pressure I'll give you, sure. The nuke's about 1 million psi at its peak, whilst the sun's core is billions. But implying that a nuke's peak heat being 100 million °C doesn't mean really mean anything without it being sustained is too wild to take seriously for me. Just because it's short-lived, doesn't mean it's not blatantly more lethal. The heat from a nuclear detonation is short-lived specifically because, like all thermal energy, it pours itself into anything lacking the same level of energy as it. Being at the epicentre of a nuclear explosion just means all that thermal energy is rapidly going to turn the target from room temperature to also burning hotter than the sun and partially turned to plasma real fast. And for some monsters, it might not particularly matter to their molecules if their bodies are going to disperse a good chunk of that heat 1/10th of a microsecond later, because their molecules would have already found themselves lacking chemical bonds, a couple of sub-atomic particles for good measure, and blowing in the breeze of a false dawn by that point anyway.
This fact also means that without something increasing the thermal energy available to the system, the target isn't going to get any hotter than its environment. If the environment of the sun's core caps out at 15 million °C, then the target's only getting heated to 15 million °C no matter how long it stays in there. The target at nuclear ground zero, on the other hand, could cap out at around 100 million °C, however brief that may be. Maximal thermal damage for less kinetic damage, vs less thermal damage for beyond maximal kinetic damage.
Therefore, if something isn't getting killed by the nuke, the heat from the sun isn't doing them in either. The sun's crushing force near definitely could though, and in fact is probably the main reason why it's actually lethal at all to A ranks. They may have an extreme external resistance to heat, but only external. This dissonance between external thermal resistance and internal thermal vulnerability is displayed by the M125 Asura, which is A rank. It's empowered by primordial flames, and yet has thermally weak insides. Mere magma, which can get to around 1600°C, was enough to melt the flesh behind its exposed orifices, artificially created or not. As a consequence, it actually is reasonable to theorise that certain A ranks would be capable of dying to sufficient nukes, and that the sun's ability to vaporise Level 5 bodies and dispose of A rank monsters might be evidence to support that. Then of course there's the Level 4s, which are supposed to be on par with A ranks. Me personally, after seeing her fighting for her life with A rank monsters, I don't think Doll Ella's tanking the nuclear and nuclear+ hits that big Ella is.
Also, since we're being pedantic here, figure 1 of the paper you cited says at 34 microseconds post-detonation in a range of 10m, the temperature's 9x10^5°K, or 0.89 million °C. If it's that hot at 34 microseconds, it's probably way over 1 million °C closer to 0.1 microseconds.
Last edited:
Whatever you think they are, is what they'll appear as in sex scenes. It also affects the sex of a monster that's the same species as the one that turned them too, later down the line. Except for one, in which Demi's sex is always female for some reason. Not sure if that's gameplay and story segregation or integration though, considering the nature of Demi's powers.
is that a dead end or something? cause I didn't see that in Cole's fight so i might've missed it because I messed with the stats
Dipasimaan
Active Member
- Feb 22, 2019
- 740
- 6,626
It's later down the line, story moment so you can't miss it.
Grimnir098
Member
- Jan 27, 2021
- 165
- 596
Maybe we should start using the actual names of the Apostle traits.
Gtdead figured out the Apostles give the name of their trait in their dream. "I am God's space." Ether calls Alice heir to Space, so it seems like his trait is called Space.
Power's trait is Might.
The Authority is God's will.
The Power is God's strength.
The Body is God's form.
The Memory is God's insight.
The Time is God's age.
The Ether is God's space.
The Darkness is God's void.
The Light is God's lustre.
The Truth is God's reality.
The Fantasy is God's lie.
The Destruction is God's ruin.
The Creation is God's genesis.
Ebrietas
Member
- Jul 15, 2018
- 105
- 392
I think the "God's X" names are more like descriptors rather than their actual names, considering that the names we use currently are what everyone uses to refer to them in-game, and because the "God's x" names aren't particularly good at conveying the power's true effects (Ether isn't just about space for example), but that doesn't really matter. Both sets of names are clear enough.
Yes? How do you get me not wanting an explanation from me telling you to explain?
That is, explain how what I said relates to ionizing radiation. How does me saying monster power, especially Michael's, hinders MC's regen while inside his body, relates at all to ionizing radiation. Also, if you will, explain how that would be relevant, and how you got that from my words in the first place.
Last edited: