- Jul 4, 2017
- 609
- 1,006
I personally take reviews with a grain of salt. 90% of all review systems are flawed as they are to subjective. Rarely I see a review that sways my opinion, but you often see reviews swayed by personal preference. Not to mention the fact of old version reviews like you mentioned or reviews of someone that never fully played the game. Just like the fact that people complain about no animations because the skipped them. This issue is everywhere. I go to amazon to find earphones, and get some that sound extremely good for the price yet I see someone complaining that they are not as good as beats.Well, it's their personal opinion. Some are objective, some are just crap. Everyone is a critic. But good or bad, nobody knows. Every game have it's audience. Not every game is to everybody. When I read reviews (rare), I read only new ones. How can somebody objective review a game after one update. How can I categorize a review where first sentence is;"After 10 minutes of game I couldn't play longer because (insert your own reason). We are all different, we will not like or dislike one game. If I like a game I will comment, if not, I will not. But I will not write crap in review. There are thousands of game here to play. After I read tags of a new game and think I would like it, I try it. We should know those games have an author who likes it, it's his game, not ours. If we like it, good, if not, then not.
Haters will always hate. The bigger anything is the more haters will come.