So you admit that you have no idea whether he's being fake or not. When a dev keeps saying an update will release for over 4 months but it didn't. Then you have to think something is seriously wrong or they are lying, maybe both... Either way you can't treat your customers like that, constantly saying an update will be ready many times over the four months is deceitful (intentional or not)
YES I can say it without any problem when it is a fact I know little about people and you ?
As long as you do not know about the dev more than me, saying a dev is "fake" or dishonest is no more accurate/likely than my choice (being trusting the dev when I see regular posts and acceptable explanations when he is late).
And just being late is dishonest from your pov ? Despite any explanation ?
I am even more eager to see how you will deal with problems when making your game, by problems I mean BIG ones, enough to take time to solve and WILL make you late releasing updates...
Claiming you will NEVER be late is naive... You have no experience and those, who do have here, are sometimes or often late... Refunds will not be enough to redeem yourself, you speak here only about being late to be unacceptable and disrespectful towards subscribers.
The game
Life as an innocent waitress by Frisson Studios came here as an example of not being late... Very good game I like it a lot...
Have you seen its structure ? A repetitive day that loops and new content is unlocked by small parts each run (in-game day after in-game day) : good strategy to maximize reuse of assets... The only drawback is it can be seen as grinding when no/too little new content is available for some parts (subway molesting new content reached when new is still to unlock in the bar can make subway grinding, for example)
The East Block is not the same, it is like a movie, this means that reusability is lower when compared with Frisson Studios game and new assets must be made in each update : that put a higher risk to face problems and then... to be late...
No one from those two strategies of design can be seen as better than the other : both have their drawbacks...
Now about subscribers...
There is something weird about you to put ALL responsabilities on the dev and none on the subscribers...
Hey ! Subscribers are free make their own choices !!
Promises are only binding on those who believe in them...
No dev can force you to subscribe against your will and managing your money is YOUR responsability, not the dev's... We are all adults there...
Some years ago, I supported a dev that gave up his game almost a year later without any warning : did I blame the dev ? No... I should have been more cautious. Period...
If ever this dev came back later with another game, obviously, I would not have supported his new game : he lost my trust...
You do not get how Patreon work... Devs and subscribers do not sign any contract or agreement of any kind that binds them...
Hence, devs do not owe anything to subscribers...
In the other hand,
in the same way that devs owe nothing to subscribers, subscribers do not owe trust and their support in devs... Trust MUST be earned and maintained by devs to gather interested subscribers around their game project.
Devs can nurture such trust with regular posts about their progression, the difficulties they face and delay risks that can occur...
Dishonesty is not in being late when you explain it, it is in hiding it without explanation... Food for thought...
Mark these words down for when you yourself will be late making your game... Unexpected problems WILL arise.. and problems that you do not see solution when they arise and that require investigation : such investigation means time consumed to find a solution and NOT continue adding new content to the game...
If you think a dev is not worthy of support, that's YOUR business, it doesn't challenge those who think otherwise unless you have more information (facts) you can share than just your feeling...
If a dev says the update is coming soon, say end of the month and a subscriber believes him. Then of course they will sign up for that period if they want to see the update. This is not something to blame the subscriber for. This is the devs fault for not sticking to his word! This shows your biast to the developer with blind trust, which he has taken advantage of but you still say its ok. Now supporters know not to trust the dev
Promises are only binding on those who believe in them...
I choose to support devs... But that does not mean I blindly support either...
Completely misunderstood what i was saying! I said the dev releases each update after the day of the month when the previous one was. So people who are subscribing month by month will pay an extra month from when they first did, to see the new update - not a bug fix update, a brand new one. Dev gets an extra month payment every update by releasing it on a certain day after most supporters subscription runs out. He has done this every update for over a year. Has nothing to do with a bug fix update - maybe use another translation software to understand what people are saying. This is why its so hard to have a conversation with someone who doesn't know English well. They can't understand some things and go off on tangents that have nothing to do with the original statement.
Yes, I misunderstood and you are right on one thing, I am not a native english speaker (french is). That makes my reaction about versioning off topic, yes...
That said, just tell me...
What does it change ? Does that make your posts less delusional ?
Nope... Rather than my speech about versioning, just read again my first lines about subscribers in this post... You will find my answer to what you say here...
I will just add that : I give money monthly, It then becomes part of my responsability as a subscriber to follow the dev's posts to be able to decide whether I continue to support or not... That's why, lack of communication from devs IS also a problem that can convince to stop support...
As a dev myself, I KNOW that problems that arise sometimes can be annoying and can make devs waste a lot of time... That's why I expect devs to speak about them to explain any delay I can see... You, YOU STLL KNOW NOTHING about all that... THAT makes all you claimed about delay to be unacceptable and despicable arrogance...
I made a general complaint about the game and the dev. It is YOU who argued and replied to me. I was not talking to you or at you. You decided to say these things because you were angry and frustrated that someone would say someting negative about something you like. As you are paying for this monthly and have emotional and monetary investment to defend. You could have said nothing and left it or even not replied to me but said something separately in the thread. You chose to be the one that started this. Yet you blame me?
Ok, I am not a native english speaker, but do not try to fool me !!

When speaking about frustration in the post of yours I reacted to, YOU replied to a post of MINE and you used "YOUR frustration" in it... How on earth can I suddenly be able to guess it is a "general complaint" ??
Come on !!
You call me stubborn and delusional throughout your speech. Im pointing out things which should be common sense and warning signs to you and others. Believe it or not but I'm actually trying to help you. When there are so many issues that have been going on - it is you who looks the stubborn one to not realize. You are putting up more excuses than the dev! There is a saying - "It is easier to fool someone, then to make them believe that they have been fooled". Its up to you to see these things happening and make your own mind up. For now you have chosen to defend the dev for even things you say you're not sure of. Yet you admit that there is problems but you trust him. How long will that trust last when these same things keep happening... ? Devs must love supporters like you! Many people have been in your position and defended devs when they were paying them, being naive over excuses. Once you stop and realize devs have been taking advantage of supporters trust, like lots of us who have been around this genre for many years and have learnt the painful way, which I'm trying to make you not go through. You will eventually see yourself what is actually going on.You are trusting first and sceptical last. Where as I am the opposite, as I've seen this pattern before from many devs.
"Warning signs" are subjective... They are not facts that no one can deny...
Nope... I do not defend the dev despite what you call "common sense", I just say that being late despite promising a release before is NEITHER being a liar nor being dishonest as long as you explain it by providing a good reason...
How do you know the "same things" keep happening to make this dev late ?
What make you sure this dev is taking "advantage of supporters trusts" ?
"Trusting first, skeptical last" ? Nope... I follow
Innocent until proven guilty... If you do not do that, anyone can be accused of anything : unfair...
You MUST provide evidences to prove bad behavior... Following your way about criminality for example, prisons would be full of innocent people...