So, you are saying Defender is not a good solution, yet in the test you have linked too, he is comparable to other AVs and the only one that is not only free, but comes built in Windows. As I already said, it's not perfect, but it is getting better and better. And to be honest, actually third party AVs were made for those lazy IT techs, because in every company i have ever seen, they just install them and dont care. With Windows Defender most of the system administrators use it to force policies through Azure or Active Directory and even block file types on the computers connected to the domain. The only downside of Defender is that he is doing a lot of reads and writes to the hard drive in the background so RIP cheap SSD's.
Except I've been vociferously stating that it's not good for you (the user, the only one who should be managing the computer they're visiting F95 and pirating on) to use at every point, and that the only good point is that it can be managed easily via Azure in an all-Microsoft setting for a lazy IT tech solution. That doesn't imply at all that I'm one of those lazy IT people. How in the hell you even got to that conclusion I don't know, unless you didn't read and just skipped through what was written to try and bash me.
Multiple of those are completely free to home users as well, though? The only benefit there is it's built-in to Windows, so you can half-ass things and just use what's used by default... Just the way that Norton or McAfee were put on computers by default when sold through places like Best Buy. The Azure connection is what makes it lazy, since it's one-stop setup and monitoring with little functionality; using individual-use AVs en masse via a clone/freeze desktop system is also lazy.
That's a generic. We've talked at length about this, and I showed the virustotal reports. "B!ml" is just the generic "this injects code!" tag (specifically, "!ml" means "machine learning", which is how Microsoft's database tries to learn features common to malware and then flags them). Wacatac is another common generic false positive. Neither are guarenteed false positives, but just follow simple safety procedures, upload to virustotal and compare the total number of detections and explicit repeats of exact trojan file names; if it's just random, or a few different ones, then it's just because it's injecting code in some way and that's been picked up. If it has the same name multiple times and isn't drowned out by and large by undetecteds and generics, then that's cause for further concern, sandboxing, etc. or simply not using that file, if the option avails itself.
Are the scenes with the machine only? or does the doctor or someone else have some "action" too?
There should be scenes with the doctor. But I haven't played the game in a while, after losing a few hours of progress because it was impossible to defeat a invasion.
| Patch | Download |
|---|---|
Translation (0.1) |
You must be registered to see the links
|
