NexivSelecaf
Engaged Member
- Aug 25, 2017
- 2,407
- 10,757
- 747
But what if Null gets to the point where he can control the negation and-!?
Oh right. Forgot that was a thing. Mystery solved.
Ren'Py The Null Hypothesis [v0.8c] [Ron Chon]
- Thread starter ronchonbon
- Start date
The_Man_With_No_Name
Well-Known Member
- Dec 16, 2022
- 1,374
- 5,550
- 523
People think too hard about sub vs dom. Unless it's some bdsm stuff, you don't really need static roles and changing dynamics isn't an issue.
I usually have a Null that encourages dom Jean but will still pound her in the ass doggy from time to time.
Ruoken
Member
- Nov 7, 2021
- 178
- 452
- 186
Yeah doesn't she die a lot and get sent back in time to just die again or something like that i just remember looking into Jubilee cause she's a fave and just seeing all the horrible shit that's happened to her
NexivSelecaf
Engaged Member
- Aug 25, 2017
- 2,407
- 10,757
- 747
Yeah, I remember now thanks to salscou: 'Power bottom". I just haven't heard the term in a while.
Stop tempting me to switch alliances to Jean. Jean isn't metal.
Edit: My self-imposed holdout for 0.9 is pretty rough.
Last edited:
She's flat out shot and is revived minutes later through mundane means. Her mental and physical state are horribly and she lost her powers because she was straight up a corpse.
Someone mentioned Dazzler a bit ago but she actually died several times. And it was retconned that every time you saw her get hit with something that would kill a normal human, it did kill her.
You may wonder "How the fuck does photon energy make you immortal?"
The answer is that Dazzler had a second mutation that allows her to convert her physical body into light. So any damaged tissue just gets turned into radiant energy and reformed. The reason we never see it is because... our eyes cannot see a process that's as fast as light.
The_Man_With_No_Name
Well-Known Member
- Dec 16, 2022
- 1,374
- 5,550
- 523
They were always vague on that, but yeah it's implied that's how her resurrection works.
I don't think they ever had it where even she knew how it worked. She was always like "Yep. Don't know why. I die and come back."
Ruoken
Member
- Nov 7, 2021
- 178
- 452
- 186
Fucking hell Marvel Jubes did nothing to deserve this shit i remember seeing that she was crucified
that's doing too much she dies every time is wild and the mental state that'd leave her in i couldn't imagine. So if she dies and revives is it instant to the point it you don't realize it or is she unconscious every time she revives herself. It's too confusing could've just made it her photon energy makes her cells more durable and regenerate not constant death and resurrection.
And they forgot it during the Krakoa era.
It was instant to the point where SHE didn't realize it.
As the Man says.
The_Man_With_No_Name
Well-Known Member
- Dec 16, 2022
- 1,374
- 5,550
- 523
So in line with Dazzler taking things in stride when she can. Her intro was the same.
Buttholder
Member
- Feb 25, 2022
- 334
- 1,244
- 203
Dazzler's resurrective thing always looked like it was building up to something, but, as with a lot of Claremont's plot threads during his various returns, it got sidelined by stupid editorial bullshit and went nowhere. By the time New Excalibur was being published, doing a continuous, uninterrupted story over the course of years - the exact thing you hire Claremont to do in the first place - was basically an impossibility.
You could see it even during the height of the Claremont era where editorial wanted to chop up the continuous storyline he had going, even though those books were the best-selling books Marvel had and numerous other examples of how continuous storylines are the best, consistent sellers.
They are genuinely obsessed with killing their golden goose at the earliest opportunity.
Course, now they've actually succeeded, and we're stuck with the current mess.
Wait, so we can't see a process that's as fast as light... Light...the thing that allows us to see...
For the hundredth bloody time, update is coming; they just needed to get the tech stuff out of the way first.
They've been completely open about what is going where, and what is taking the most amount of resources and time.
They've been completely open about what is going where, and what is taking the most amount of resources and time.
salscou
Engaged Member
- Apr 14, 2020
- 3,821
- 18,024
- 678
My guy, they dont care.
They are stuck in the mindset that more girls=more better, not realizing how pointless is to add characters when the base game isnt done yet.
The_Man_With_No_Name
Well-Known Member
- Dec 16, 2022
- 1,374
- 5,550
- 523
The problem is that the devs are wrong.
You're supposed to add more content then the game makes sense supporting, reboot it one or two times after you realized you messed up, and... get called a milker still.
They need to get with the program.
Anyway, the game is F Tier until Ophelia Sarkissian is in.
Up that dev feature scope creep. Villain Null when?
Last edited:
I know that it's basically yelling at a wall, but goddamn is it frustrating to see it happen over and over again.
pepplez
Well-Known Member
- Jun 7, 2020
- 1,072
- 1,466
- 307
armond
Engaged Member
- Apr 26, 2020
- 2,436
- 9,927
- 678
As a general response. We're actually in the red so if we're milking things, we're doing a pretty shit job at it.
How in the red are we? Ron uses more than $1K out of pocket a month to pay the artists. Everyone else, the writers, the music guy, me, UI people are purely volunteer.
Would we be in a better financial situation if we just threw out girls with 2 interactions and added the rest and their stories 6 updates later and then eventually have to break saves again because we chose to rush things?
Looking at the financial situation of a lot of the other games? Yeah, we'd probably be getting more money that way.
But no. We're actively losing money because our passion for the project outweighs any desire for making money off it.
To be honest we might have to look into more ways of making things financially stable or we're gonna need to start using placeholder art.
How in the red are we? Ron uses more than $1K out of pocket a month to pay the artists. Everyone else, the writers, the music guy, me, UI people are purely volunteer.
Would we be in a better financial situation if we just threw out girls with 2 interactions and added the rest and their stories 6 updates later and then eventually have to break saves again because we chose to rush things?
Looking at the financial situation of a lot of the other games? Yeah, we'd probably be getting more money that way.
But no. We're actively losing money because our passion for the project outweighs any desire for making money off it.
To be honest we might have to look into more ways of making things financially stable or we're gonna need to start using placeholder art.
Last edited: