salscou

Engaged Member
Apr 14, 2020
3,981
19,541
729
How the hell are we gaslighting you by telling you that we are factually expanding the the quirks?
Because youre not, you keep NOT adressing the problem, changing the nature of said quirks its whats the matter here, holy crap i feel like im taking crazy pills here or im speaking in chinese, time after time i make the same point and you guys gloss over it and repeat the same answer i keep telling you is not the issue, as it stands the game lost a way of playing that was enjoyable, people like Jean being thirsty or Laura being a stalker if you encourage it, this is the matter, changing it to a platonic version is missing the entire point of what made it fun, hell, how many people have you had tell you the same that they play 0.8c and feel like the game is missing out?

You and many others keep posting things and acting like point 3 is us "gaslighting" you into not complaining.
Ive said that exactly ONCE, and is precisely because i got pissed because the constant refusal to engage in the actual conversation that people are complaining about, if people keep complaining about not liking the change, then maybe people actually do not like the change bootsie, i dont know how i can say this in any other way.

I have no fucking clue how getting MORE of something you guys apparently love so much that you get enraged over it is a bad thing.
Because it is not the same, thats the gaslighting, the proposed exchange does not adress what people wanted with the quirk system, it is not a matter of "more", it is a matter of being a completely different context and tone of interaction.

Again, you can say that you want to do it like that because it suits more what you guys want to do, thats fine, its your artistic freedom, but it isnt the same, it isnt what people complaining about this are missing, it is not "more", its "different", and people are in their right to complain about not wanting the different thing.
 
Last edited:

OnlyNeverNow

Active Member
Aug 9, 2018
627
1,387
317
For the love of god. We're adding MORE quirk content. The content that was in the game explicitly treated it like you were dating, not simple flirtation.


This wasn't in the game. This is what we're adding to the content that's been restricted to dating the girls.

I'm sorry if I'm sounding a tad miffed but I'm not the only one who's reading you guys' posts and thinking you want the girls to act like you're their boyfriend when you have a strictly platonic, if playful, relationship.

If you want the game to outright ignore reality then feel free to mod it but stop acting like we permanently took away content when we're adding a net gain in additional content for you to consume.

I'll admit Ron's decision to block off the existing content for platonic interactions, because again it's still in the game if you romance them, prior to the new content being able to be implemented was a bad move but you guys are acting like there is suddenly an absence with no hope of ever being filled when we've repeatedly told you and rephrased it six ways to Sunday that the quirk content isn't gone, and you're going to be getting more of it.
Maybe you just meant this as a more general response, but I feel like there's a misunderstanding of my point.

Like in your conversation, you say you want platonic big sis Jean to complain about the "hussies" distracting MC, that's all well and good I guess, but I was refering specifically to pre-dating, explicitly flirtatious quirking, which is how I feel most of the options came across in older versions.

IDK, i feel like there's a huge middle ground between "ignore reality and act like MC is their boyfriend" and flirting/teasing/testing the waters with their kink. Laura telling MC that they smell good isn't some crazy dialogue that only makes sense if you've been dating for months.

And I think it's a little disingenuous to blame people for feeling like content was removed "when we're eventually going to get a net gain" when that net gain isn't available and we don't know what it will look like, so content was removed. I agree that it was a bad idea to remove the system before implementing the replacement, I restarted for the current version but I assume I'll have to restart again when the new platonic system is added. i'm sure its very annoying to hear the complaint ad nauseum, but what else could you expect from that situation?

Maybe at the least, some previews of the kind of interactions these new platonic quirk will be would calm a lot of people down, because it's unclear right now, and even from your comment, if there are going to be 100% platonic quirks that are unrelated to romancing the girls (ex- jean likes to study!), or if they're pre-dating quirks that still involve flirting that get upgraded into kinks when you start dating (ex- jean has a sibling quirk that sometimes feels like its crossing the line, we went on a date, now its a full blown incest kink). If you don't want to give previews, that's fine, but then you can't blame people for wondering and speculating about it.

or the best option, just ignore me entirely. I was just asking for a little clarification and venting my feelings a bit. Didn't meant to sound impatient or ungrateful or anything. sorry if anything came off that way, obvs just make the game you wanna make
 

ShinyBoots1993

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2020
1,896
6,692
647
people like Jean being thirsty or Laura being a stalker if you encourage it
And as I've said, this is not permanently removed. Stop acting like it is.

IDK, i feel like there's a huge middle ground between "ignore reality and act like MC is their boyfriend" and flirting/teasing/testing the waters with their kink. Laura telling MC that they smell good isn't some crazy dialogue that only makes sense if you've been dating for months.
YES! We're making this middle ground. That's all we want to fucking do. And I don't want anyone claiming we never specified that.

Girls will still show interest in you. They'll still show signs of quirks. They'll just stop acting like you're their boyfriend when you're not their boyfriend.

And I think it's a little disingenuous to blame people for feeling like content was removed "when we're eventually going to get a net gain" when that net gain isn't available and we don't know what it will look like, so content was removed.
But that's not what I was doing. I was accused of gaslighting after saying we were going to add content.

People can be concerned and worried sure. There's a lot of unknown variables but salscou accused me of an extremely emotionally abusive act after saying we're trying to make the system more complex and nuanced.

I assume I'll have to restart again when the new platonic system is added.
You assume incorrectly.

(ex- jean has a sibling quirk that sometimes feels like its crossing the line, we went on a date, now its a full blown incest kink)
That is 100% coming back and I have no idea how many times I can say that without people's responses boiling down to "No it's not!"

People can complain all the want but I'm going to repeatedly correct them if they make claims that simply aren't true.
 

salscou

Engaged Member
Apr 14, 2020
3,981
19,541
729
And as I've said, this is not permanently removed. Stop acting like it is.
Shinny, you cannot have it both ways, either its coming back, or it is different, as youve said here.

YES! We're making this middle ground. That's all we want to fucking do. And I don't want anyone claiming we never specified that.

Girls will still show interest in you. They'll still show signs of quirks. They'll just stop acting like you're their boyfriend when you're not their boyfriend.
This, is not the same, both things cannot be true at the same time, it is simply impossible, any further iteraction with the context being different makes it a different thing from what we had, simple as, they cannot be the same thing, you repreating that we are getting it back is simply incorrect and you keep missing the point, no, Jean showing up and being clingy about how much you need to focus on your studies is not the same as permathirsty Jean, they are not the same thing, you cannot spin that around.

Anyways.


1765284094446.png

There was a spooky ghost! you all just missed it!
 

ShinyBoots1993

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2020
1,896
6,692
647
This, is not the same, both things cannot be true at the same time, it is simply impossible, any further iteraction with the context being different makes it a different thing from what we had, simple as, they cannot be the same thing, you repreating that we are getting it back is simply incorrect and you keep missing the point, no, Jean showing up and being clingy about how much you need to focus on your studies is not the same as permathirsty Jean, they are not the same thing, you cannot spin that around.
Understood. You want the girls' dialogue to imply that you are in a relationship even when you're not.

I don't know why you want this because the writing was NOT them pathologically deluding themselves into thinking they were your girlfriend, but was the universe outright treating you as if you were dating but to each their own.

Before you respond. No, I am not putting words in your mouth. It is just a fact. The writing we gated behind dating them was intentionally written for the fact that you were dating them.

If you want it back, you want the game to disregard reality.

But all that said in done the number one thing that bothers me is that you haven't even considered waiting to see what the writers actually put out.

Which is extremely disappointing coming from YOU as an individual specifically because until now you were one of the biggest supporters of "letting the devs cook" but no. For some reason you're doing a heel face turn and acting like we broke your favorite toy.

I'm done talking about this until the content actually comes out.
 

salscou

Engaged Member
Apr 14, 2020
3,981
19,541
729
Which is extremely disappointing coming from YOU as an individual specifically because until now you were one of the biggest supporters of "letting the devs cook" but no. For some reason you're doing a heel face turn and acting like we broke your favorite toy.
That has not changed at all, if you feel that way, then it sucks i guess, but i hold my point, you cannot argue that "you guys are getting more of what you want" when in essence it isnt the same thing, this is the matter shinny, me being vocal about a change isnt "a heel turn", much more because i am no the only person that has expressed that i do not like this change, but go ahead and paint me as an antagonist for the team then, i will not fall victim to any toxic positivity, if i do not like something i will say it, and again, i am not the only one, that comes with any creative effort and you should be able to deal with it and not act all mad because people dont agree.
 

Hiarus

Newbie
Jun 10, 2024
84
191
170
Which is extremely disappointing coming from YOU as an individual specifically because until now you were one of the biggest supporters of "letting the devs cook" but no. For some reason you're doing a heel face turn and acting like we broke your favorite toy.

I'm done talking about this until the content actually comes out.
Tbh I don't even give that much of a shit about the quirks being "removed" for now, I'm all for waiting and seeing

But ngl this feels really icky; Salsou has supported this game in the past, and now suddenly because they are being vocal about ONE change they didn't like they're a "heel"? Are they supposed to be ride or die without questioning anything or something?
 

Hiarus

Newbie
Jun 10, 2024
84
191
170
Boots wasn't calling Salscou a Heel (as in bad guy from something like wrestling), a heel face or heel turn is something which militaries formations do where they turn on the heels of their boots and immediately do a 180 degree turn.
Same different; Boot's saying Salcou switched up
 
  • Wow
Reactions: armond
4.60 star(s) 158 Votes