I do agree no choice is better than illusion of choice.
Yes, this is
not a bad game, just suffering from the meaningless choices. If it would become a kinetic novel instead it would be much better.
But it's rather funny how you called an all or nothing game, 'actual choice'. That's where your confusion shows, or maybe your frustration right this moment is making you temporarily unable to consider things.
This is a porn game and what matters is - who you fuck. Because that also unironically exists - porn games that ask if you want to eat cereal or pancakes for breakfast but then don't ask you who you want to fuck. This game asks the player who they want to fuck very scarcely, so it is better to not to ask at all. Proper choice is -
all sexual content should be optional, that is the most important choice anyone cares about in a porn game - sexual content choice. If you don't want to offer that, if you want to tell the story that you want, that is absolutely fine, there is nothing wrong with that. Make it a kinetic novel and tell the story that you want to tell, don't ask for the player input. Don't ask the player if they want to see less or more sexual content, the answer is obvious.
I'm curious, do you comment on 'gay/lesbian' only games and ask for a 'real' choice of straight path, or vice versa?
No, the choice is sexual content that you get with every character
present in the game.
What happens in this game is this: both MC's cheat on each other, and then the game asks you: ''Do you want to see more or less cheating?'' And the answer is obvious, since they already cheated you want to maximize the sexual content you can see, since they are already on the cheating path. I have absolutely no clue, why you would
choose to see less sexual content in a porn game. That is not a choice.
If this is a game about cheating, that is fine, then make choices about the sexual content like: ''Do you want to see doggy or missionary?'' That is the choice that is offered in fuckboy / slut simulators.