I agree, because it lets girls move around. I think there can be times when it makes sense to lock certain girls into certain roles, like locking new, low-openness girls into bartending, but in those late hours when your girls are tired, you need versatility to take care of those last remaining customers.
I used to try to assign the girls who'd been trained the most in the gym as security, but it didn't work well. Now, I just train them all up before I hire more.
I just thought it was valuable responding to you stating the reasons why I won't follow *some* of your suggestions.
If it's a discussion, then there are 2 sides involved; I don't see why leaving out rationales from discussions is a better option to you. Aside from agreeing and disagreeing, aren't the reasons behind that interesting as well?
Again, in the same way you expressed your opinions, I expressed mine. I don't get why you get more offended by the fact I try to explain my reasons.
And I never said your opinions are *wrong* – as a matter of fact an opinion by its definition can't be wrong or right, it's subjective – I just explained why part of your opinions won't affect eventual future updates.
You're absolutely entitled to have all the opinions you want; pretending your opinions match mines, or that I should just *follow or ignore*, or that I don't have counter-arguments is a very different story though..
Me neither. It was the whole point behind me saying "if you prefer playing VC, that's fine"
rb813
Well-Known Member
- Aug 28, 2018
- 1,511
- 1,001
Because your rationale was just that I "should" play the game the way you enjoy it, instead of the way I enjoy it. I don't see how that adds to the discussion. If anything, it simply tells me that I can't contribute anything of value to the discussion unless I'm playing the game the way it's intended to be played. Do you disagree? Do you want me to continue sharing my viewpoints about what features I'd like to see in the game, if I'm not gonna be playing it the way it was intended to be played?
It's fine if you don't. You're the one who put all the effort into making the game, so you get to dictate the future of its development. But I don't see how you telling me I shouldn't play the game the way I enjoy somehow makes for better ongoing discussion. Explaining your rationale for how you intended the game to be or how you personally enjoy it (and therefore what kind of features you would be motivated to keep working on) will not change what is enjoyable to me.
You said "I think if you want to play TUSC, you should do it in the way the game was intended to." Telling me how you think I should play the game is more than just explaining why part of my opinions won't affect eventual future updates. Maybe this will come off as pedantic (story of my life), but I don't think there can be any "should" without a concept of right and wrong. You probably wouldn't tell people, "you should like chocolate ice cream more than vanilla," because that is just a matter of opinion, which as you say can't be right or wrong. If you told someone they should like one flavor more than another, I think that would mean you're telling them that there is an objective standard of taste superiority which one flavor adheres to better than the other. Likewise, if you say I should play the game a certain way, I think that necessitates a right and wrong way to play the game, which you are tacitly comparing my play style with.
If that's not how you meant by it, if you just meant like, "you would enjoy it more if you played it this way," then I can accept that you didn't mean it in a harsh way. But I still can't really contribute anything further to the discussion, because I won't enjoy it more that way. I can't change the way I enjoy the game any more than you can.
Again, I have absolutely no resentment toward you just wanting to make a game that suits your own play style and not trying to reach the widest possible audience. I would probably do exactly the same if I had the same programming skill as you. I completely understand not putting in time and effort to add some features that some rando on the internet expressed interest in one time. But in terms of getting feedback and starting discussions about possible further developments to the game, there just isn't much to talk about if you only want to do what suits your own personal way of enjoying the game. All possible feedback you could ever get will either align with something you were already interested in doing, or be something that comes out of a person not playing the game as it should be played.
If I preferred playing VC, why would I be here in the first place? The whole reason I put this much effort into trying to figure this game out, is because I thought it might fill a niche that VC doesn't fill. And it does kinda fill that niche, it just doesn't do it as well as I would like.
Precisely.
I was trying to say: "look, the game is not designed to provide a good experience with 10 girlpacks. It's not designed to be a perfect media player for girlpacks. You can absolutely still play ignoring those facts, but your experience will be just a poor experience compared to what the game was designed for and what other ppl suggested you to".
rb813
Well-Known Member
- Aug 28, 2018
- 1,511
- 1,001
The reason I'm using only 11 girlpacks (as I've explained before), is because this game only displays one full-screen video at a time, so I don't want to use girlpacks that have videos I wouldn't like. And that's basically every girlpack out there, except the ones that I've made myself, or looked through every video and removed the ones I didn't like. You know how many of those there are? 11, and even most of those aren't completely ideal for my tastes.
In other words, having more than 11 girlpacks would be a poor experience compared to having only girlpacks with clips I like. The long-term solution is to make or vet more girlpacks, and that is something I'm constantly working on, but it's a slow process. (Let's just say I have a driving need to be thorough. The girlpack I'm working on now was started almost three weeks ago, and it might be as little as halfway done.) So people suggesting that I should put more girlpacks in doesn't really help much, because I'm already going as quickly as I can (without sacrificing quality).
If you don't want to make any modifications to the game that would provide a good experience with 10 girlpacks, that is again totally your choice and I won't resent you for it. But I don't really think it would take a whole lot of extra effort, and I'm probably not the only one who would benefit from it (since there are probably plenty of people out there with a lot less hard drive space than me, and definitely people who want to dip their toe into the game while waiting for the daily limit on Mega downloads to refresh).
But honestly, I'm not even sure how this is relevant, because I don't see how having more than 11 girlpacks would change any of the four points I raised in my big wishlist comment. It might change stuff like the club being closed early because of inadequate bouncers, but that wasn't really a big problem for me, it was just an example of how the game lacked clarity. It wouldn't change anything about having all the categories be viewable in one room, and it wouldn't change anything about some girls being randomly selected more than others.
I'm not asking for perfect. All I was really asking for was the ability to watch all available scene types in one place, with more balanced randomness. Why shouldn't "the ultimate stripper club" have one unpredictable room where absolutely anything can happen, anyway? Sounds pretty ultimate to me. It only took me like two weeks (not even playing every day) to get every single upgrade available in the game, I don't think it would hurt to have a few more.
If you don't want to do that, fine, but "a perfect media player for girlpacks" is not an accurate representation of what I wished to see.
Last edited:
i think it would be a feature for 1 person only tbh, i don't see anyone else in your shoes.
Can someone explain this game though? Is it just straight up better than VC? Is there anything missing comparatively? How come it's so much less popular still despite VC being not developed for so long?
WarblGarbl
Member
- Oct 10, 2017
- 453
- 489
I prefer VC because it has up to 6 videos at once, letting you jump back and forth to the ones you like. TUSC has the girls split off in different areas, so more focused on one vid. That's the biggest difference imo.
If you have the girlpacks you can try both.
I would say it boils down to a matter of taste. I bounce between the two, but probably TUSC 60/40. As someone who augments my own packs with HD videos, I strongly prefer that this shows them big and clearly, instead of the system that VC uses. But there are some management and functional aspects of VC that I like more too. They're both good games, and its fortunate that we can use the same packs in each of them.
rb813
Well-Known Member
- Aug 28, 2018
- 1,511
- 1,001
This seems like a really strange juxtaposition to me. You're so new to the game that you don't even know how it's different from VC, but you're already making assumptions about how many people would want a certain feature? Not to mention that it's not even clear which feature you're talking about, since you quoted my entire long comment.
I was trying to install this but kept getting this error whenever I tried to run the program. I tried all 3 working download links and ran into the same error with each one and running as administrator doesn't work either. Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
