CREATE YOUR AI CUM SLUT ON CANDY.AI TRY FOR FREE
x

Deleted member 216358

Well-Known Member
Modder
Donor
Game Developer
Sep 24, 2017
1,316
3,151
Given that there are even some 80-plus-year-olds who love huge breasts and asses, I feel like Monkeyposter's body-type choices actually make sense to a point.
I shouldn't have to explain this to people, yet here we are...

I don't disagree that some 80-plus-year-olds (as you put it) love huge breasts. The problem is with how breasts are defined. Many of the female breasts in this game defy human female anatomy and physiology. Real breasts don't look like this and aren't shaped like this. This isn't my opinion, it is a fact. Human physiology is a science and nearly everything can be defined.

So what this game calls breasts are really a watermelon cut in half with each half glued to a female character model's chest with human skin covering them. Sorry, but these aren't breasts, they are something else entirely!

I understand that many players on this site don't know what real breasts look like. That is another problem.

Developers stretching the limits of the character model's breast sliders isn't appealing to anyone who wants humans to look like humans. I'm all for variety as long as it is somewhat realistic. Putting watermelons or zeppelins on a female character model is both childish and immature.

I love huge female breasts, but they have to be human breasts, not some cartoon highly unrealistic fantasy!

Players are free to disagree but you can't argue with proven science (human physiology and anatomy in this case). People can call a dog a cat and vice versa but just because it is someone's incorrect opinion doesn't make it acceptable or true. Saying 2 + 2 = 5 isn't true no matter how much people may want it to be. Bottom line - watermelons and zeppelins are NOT human breasts nor will they ever be!
 

-CookieMonster666-

Message Maven
Nov 20, 2018
12,024
17,836
I shouldn't have to explain this to people, yet here we are...

I don't disagree that some 80-plus-year-olds (as you put it) love huge breasts. The problem is with how breasts are defined. Many of the female breasts in this game defy human female anatomy and physiology. Real breasts don't look like this and aren't shaped like this. This isn't my opinion, it is a fact. Human physiology is a science and nearly everything can be defined.

So what this game calls breasts are really a watermelon cut in half with each half glued to a female character model's chest with human skin covering them. Sorry, but these aren't breasts, they are something else entirely!

I understand that many players on this site don't know what real breasts look like. That is another problem.

Developers stretching the limits of the character model's breast sliders isn't appealing to anyone who wants humans to look like humans. I'm all for variety as long as it is somewhat realistic. Putting watermelons or zeppelins on a female character model is both childish and immature.

I love huge female breasts, but they have to be human breasts, not some cartoon highly unrealistic fantasy!

Players are free to disagree but you can't argue with proven science (human physiology and anatomy in this case). People can call a dog a cat and vice versa but just because it is someone's incorrect opinion doesn't make it acceptable or true. Saying 2 + 2 = 5 isn't true no matter how much people may want it to be. Bottom line - watermelons and zeppelins are NOT human breasts nor will they ever be!
For all of the writing you did, you really didn't understand my point. I shouldn't have to explain this to you, yet here we are...

I wasn't talking about realism or whether the "breasts" in this game could actually exist. I was talking about fantasies men have (which apparently are shattered by your hyper-focus on realism). Porn is about fantasies. This game is a porn game
. . . about fantasies. Monkeyposter is catering to fantasies, not to reality. I was merely saying his renders make sense with his aim: to show fantasy anatomy, not scientific reality. I agree with you on their being unrealistic, but that's actually the point of the renders.

I would also suggest you curb your condescending tone with crap like, "many players on this site don't know what real breasts look like". You can express an opinion without making unfounded assumptions that insult other people.
 

Iconick

Newbie
Feb 18, 2021
44
40
very possible it's just generic daz asset.
I do agree that is entirely possible that it could just be a Daz Asset. But there is just something about that image on the mug that does not look like a "created" image. It feels familiar to me somehow as if I have seen it before....and not in a VN or game of any sort. It just looks and feels more like it is a real photograph that was used. But again, I do agree with what you said and I could be totally wrong that it is a real image. That's why I was asking. :)
 

cxx

Message Maestro
Nov 14, 2017
66,709
33,619
to me it reminds scene from spellbook game but it isn't same.
 

Irgendwie Irgendwo

Engaged Member
Jun 30, 2018
2,829
3,451
I do agree that is entirely possible that it could just be a Daz Asset. But there is just something about that image on the mug that does not look like a "created" image. It feels familiar to me somehow as if I have seen it before....and not in a VN or game of any sort. It just looks and feels more like it is a real photograph that was used. But again, I do agree with what you said and I could be totally wrong that it is a real image. That's why I was asking. :)
Yeah, that image looks like a screengrab from a porn vid that I downloaded ages ago. The problem is I have no idea who the woman is and I doubt that I would find it in my "library". All I know is that it would be Private or some smaller European studio.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Iconick

driverman

Member
Nov 12, 2018
243
115
I downloaded both part of this version, but when i start to extract them something goes wrong. It says that something is missing.
 
3.50 star(s) 102 Votes