Couldn't agree more man, a royal girl who thinks highly of herself? Damn that would be the dreamI all for a bondage girlLike with the bed Yvonne used but more I don't think we had one of those
As for the hypnotist, maybe something like that character from Street Fighter 5?
Odd as usually interacting is done with enter
That's where a lot of the series lost me. From very grounded fights that were martial arts themed with very little supernatural elements besides an overpowering musk. To a completely fantasy experience with a protagonist that is just a loser for all intensive purposes. The focus on more extreme kinks as well was a turn-off. So much focus on watersports... and worse the art has only been getting worse since the original red first boss. It hasn't improved since the original Mfight and it's just disappointing. What has changed is the models are so oversexualized they're actually more boring in a way.
Yes, Nikki is simply gorgeous. The only women who can beat her imo are amazons like the woman posing as my Avatar. She is Tall Tanja, a dutch Foot Goddess:
I had some of those same gripes with this game that you do, except for the art, but for me the Xmas update seemed like a return to what made ToT so great in that first floor of the game. No unrealistically strong smells, a really good minigame, no watersports or extreme femdom of any kind. Miss Clauss does use magic, but she's supposed to be Santa, so it's okay in my book. All her CGs are great, and they don't use animations so I'm sure they weren't as time-consuming to make as Karen's or Cobra's, and even though she doesn't have nowhere near as much content as those two, the update didn't feel too short in the slightest, for me it was just the right amount. I hate to sound like a broken record, but there were even NO DELAYS! The only thing missing was a fight, but it was supposed to be a small seasonal update, so what we got was plenty.
I feel the same. Never was a fan of over the top huge breasts/ass, just gives me the uncanny valley effect if anything. Though I'm only into feet and not much else so there's a big bias there.
I'm the exact same too, but I guess I just got used to the girls' extreme proportions, they only take me out of it in some CGs where they're the focus. That's why Rose was such a breath of fresh air.
ToT isn't affiliated to any porn site, I don't get why you're bringing them up. You saying that women in porn games have oversexualized bodies so therefore people shouldn't complain about them in ToT, is both a bandwagon fallacy and you ignoring that ToT belongs in the genre of foot fetish/femdom porn games, and I really doubt oversexualized bodies are the norm in THAT genre. EVEN if it were, Bo Wei says he wants to break with the tropes in his genre, so why would you want him to just do what everyone else is doing?
I'm definitely in the camp of Rose being best girl, her expansion can't come soon enough. Has anyone made a signature for her yet?
ToT is affiliated indirectly with multiple porn sites, as this site and any other site offering pornographic games are, in fact, porn sites. We can argue the semantics if you like, but porn is porn, regardless if its a video, drawing, comic or game. It's designed to be fapped to therefore its porn. Exaggerated body types are for sure common in foot fetish/femdom games as well. You are ignoring the obvious if you believe otherwise, unless you actually believe that the average dominatrix looks anything like what you see in femdom games. Porn in general is an exaggeration, and certainly a hyper-sexualized version of the real world. Let's not distort reality to fit an agenda.
He does use it, frequently. Every boss so far has used more than just foot based attacks. If you are arguing for more variety, then that's fair enough most people wouldn't oppose that ideal. Honestly I can't quite discern what your argument here is, or why you are quoting my post in order to argue it.
I like how I'm the one ignoring the obvious or the one distorting reality to fit an agenda, when you're clearly the one omitting parts of my argument and strawmanning my position, and you're still using your bandwagon fallacy.
You aren't making an argument though, you are simply attacking my own whilst offering no counter argument. You haven't explained your position, you simply labeled mine as a "bandwagon fallacy" and "strawmanning" and whining that I'm misrepresenting your "argument". Please, explain your position and I will happily debate with you. You quoted me, after all.
I did make an argument, you just ignored it. Why would I try to debate anybody who does that? If you're actually interested in what I had to say just try to reread what I posted instead of asking me to repeat myself. If you're unwilling then just let it end.
