So I haven't been keeping up with the BOOBs mod, is that dude still removing the shekka dick content? Or has he come to his senses?
Others Trials in Tainted Space [v0.9.112] [Fenoxo]
- Thread starter 7767
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 2dcg adventure ahegao anal sex bdsm big ass big tits character creation combat dilf female domination female protagonist furry futa/trans futa/trans protagonist gay groping handjob humor lactation lesbian male domination male protagonist masturbation milf mobile game monster girl multiple endings multiple penetration oral sex pregnancy puzzle religion romance sandbox sci-fi sex toys sissification spanking teasing tentacles text based titfuck transformation trap turn based combat vaginal sex virgin voyeurism
- Feb 13, 2019
- 100
- 130
IDK, but I disapprove of removing content for no reason myself
Especially avoidable content
Also the game was not compile-able as of last night
- May 19, 2017
- 11
- 3
Whats even the point of removing optional content for starters? They're entirely optional, unless you willingly want them, you can basically just ignore it for the time or till you want to experience new stuff
With the BOOBs modder removing optional content, specially futa for willy nilly and no reason, many would be somewhat forced to switch between both TiTs for the Futa and BOOBs for the incest and other stuff that got gutted from TiTs
With the BOOBs modder removing optional content, specially futa for willy nilly and no reason, many would be somewhat forced to switch between both TiTs for the Futa and BOOBs for the incest and other stuff that got gutted from TiTs
- Feb 13, 2019
- 100
- 130
If you care that much you could always fork the fork
Not that I'd recommend that for a game like this. Despite building my elaborate build system, I don't actually care about the game much anymore. They've been too slow and ruined too much. Even from the beginning, the randomness of CoC was more exciting, somehow.
- May 19, 2017
- 11
- 3
The game at this state that it is in, along with what the modder of ol Boobs is doing with removing optional content, doesn't seem quite worth it anymore really. CoC was and is still better then TiTs and BooBs in my opinion, including the revamp mod which I believe didn't remove anything but added things in and changed a couple of things due to the unfinished nature of the unmodded one
Fens now mostly interested in keeping his stock holders satisfied and the money followers, Its doubtful he'd even improve the game as it is, that or he's running outta ideas
Fens now mostly interested in keeping his stock holders satisfied and the money followers, Its doubtful he'd even improve the game as it is, that or he's running outta ideas
Nobody should be making general statements on the quality of a game solely on the basis of the fetishes it portrays.
Should vegetarians go onto e.g. Yelp and leave bad reviews for random meat-serving restaurants?
This game, like so many others tracked on this site, is pandering to a lot of different fetishes simultaneously. It possesses some elements that I find rare and exciting and then within moments throws something else up that is deeply unsettling. The worst experiences blend what one loves with that they detest; presenting a delicious looking dish before scooping the contents into a rancid-smelling waste-bin with a beaming smile and a sincere 'bon appetit'.
Nonetheless, there's a lot of content, the game-play systems are solid, a lot of the writing is very good, and I haven't run into execution errors or unsolvable puzzles.
TiTS/CoC2 may disappoint people looking for a faithful reproduction of CoC, a comparatively straightforward transformation-gacha, but there are clearly a lot of people who appreciate the genre-evolution based on patronage.
I prefer Lilith's Throne for freedom/customization/content filtering but enjoy the detailed scenes and more advanced characterization/plot development so far in TiTS. I hope that a future game, maybe a more advanced version of either, can balance the complexity of blending these approaches.
Should vegetarians go onto e.g. Yelp and leave bad reviews for random meat-serving restaurants?
This game, like so many others tracked on this site, is pandering to a lot of different fetishes simultaneously. It possesses some elements that I find rare and exciting and then within moments throws something else up that is deeply unsettling. The worst experiences blend what one loves with that they detest; presenting a delicious looking dish before scooping the contents into a rancid-smelling waste-bin with a beaming smile and a sincere 'bon appetit'.
Nonetheless, there's a lot of content, the game-play systems are solid, a lot of the writing is very good, and I haven't run into execution errors or unsolvable puzzles.
TiTS/CoC2 may disappoint people looking for a faithful reproduction of CoC, a comparatively straightforward transformation-gacha, but there are clearly a lot of people who appreciate the genre-evolution based on patronage.
I prefer Lilith's Throne for freedom/customization/content filtering but enjoy the detailed scenes and more advanced characterization/plot development so far in TiTS. I hope that a future game, maybe a more advanced version of either, can balance the complexity of blending these approaches.
Last edited:
- Feb 13, 2019
- 100
- 130
Well, I personally accept that there are people who enjoy the game/can overlook the (subjective) crap.
That doesn't mean I should not be allowed to express my opinions on the matter. To me, CoC was the better game.
And as for the number of patreon supporters… I can't argue against that. I know my voice is one in a sea of voices.
Last edited:
- Jun 6, 2017
- 227
- 965
0.7.280 -
SWF -
EXE -
AIR -
ARM -
x86 -
Image pack -
image pack EXE -
Changelog:
SWF -
You must be registered to see the links
EXE -
You must be registered to see the links
AIR -
You must be registered to see the links
ARM -
You must be registered to see the links
x86 -
You must be registered to see the links
Image pack -
You must be registered to see the links
image pack EXE -
You must be registered to see the links
Changelog:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Last edited:
- Jun 6, 2017
- 227
- 965
glad to hear they still work, else it would be a simple re-upload
Would anyone mind uploading to anywhere other than zippyshare? It's blocked and my vpn won't get me around it.
- Mar 1, 2018
- 2,135
- 2,411
Read the second part of his statement again. smh
- Feb 13, 2019
- 100
- 130
You must be registered to see the links
The desktop SWF is the SWF's he linked, but recompressed.
The Android builds are all my own versions, but if you need the originals I might be able to up whatever one you're trying to get.
Also, the imagepack version will be on there soon-ish. Gotta let it finish downloading, recompressing, and re-uploading.
P.S. Gitlab often takes a couple minutes to start serving the new links page after I update it. So it should be up soon.
Update: got distracted playing sonic 2 for genesis. Updated image pack link now.
Last edited:
- Jun 6, 2017
- 227
- 965
- Feb 13, 2019
- 100
- 130
Last I checked, mine worked on a number of phones that couldn't install the official versions.
What phone are you using? Did you try
You must be registered to see the links
?What was the error?
My Android builds should work fine on Android 4.0.3 (Ice Cream Sandwicth) and higher, and my iOS builds should work on iOS 8.0 and higher, though it might be possible for me to get it to work on older iOS as long as it has an armv7 CPU or newer.
Last edited:
Sorry been busy no it was th Shyvor one thats on top of this page that says apk x 86 every time I try to install it it says app not installed the other pal I download from previous builds installed fine don't know why this didn't
- Feb 13, 2019
- 100
- 130
…And are you using an Intel CPU in your android device? Most use ARM.
To be totally honest, It seems stupid to link to the x86 Android APK as "APK," while titling the Android APK that most people actually want as "ARM" without ever saying "APK" or "Android" in the name, since most android devices are ARM-based. When people think APK, they're typically looking for one for an ARM CPU architecture.
You probably want the "ARM" link, which should really be titled "ARM APK" or even just "Android APK."
(I'd have called his "APK" link "Android APK for Intel CPU's," or just "Intel APK.")
I noticed too, but wasn't going to say anything until other people had problems
Last edited: